【发布时间】:2023-03-16 10:06:01
【问题描述】:
如果此问题已在以下位置得到解答,我深表歉意: Topological Sort with Grouping
但是,由于我是图论新手,所以我并不完全理解答案。
我有以下物品:
c01,a11,b12,a21, b22,c23, c31,b32, a33.
每一个都是一个三元组。
Tup[0]: '要分组的信'
Tup[1]: '依赖有效的组号'
Tup[2]: '依赖排序'
我想尽可能按tup[0] 分组,同时保持item[1] 和item[2] 中的组描述的排序顺序。第 1,2 项允许我们创建依赖项,从这里我们只需要创建组。
所以我们可以创建以下依赖:
a11
a21
c31
c01
从这里我想在保持依赖关系的同时按字母分组。一种这样的解决方案是
a11, a21, b12, b22, c01, c23, c31, b32, a33
我们可以看到 a11
任何想法将不胜感激, 谢谢, 抢
一个解决方案:
def groupPreserveSorted(listOfPairs):
"""
we want to group by tup[0], but maintain the order passed in according to tup[1]
>>> lop = [['A',0], ['B',1], ['C',0], ['D',2], ['E',2]]
>>> print groupPreserveSorted(lop)
[('A', 0), ('B', 1), ('C', 0), ('D', 2), ('E', 2)]
>>> lop = [['c',0], ['a',1], ['b',1], ['a',2], ['b',2], ['a', 3], ['b', 3], ['c', 3], ['a', 4], ['b', 4]]
>>> print groupPreserveSorted(lop)
[('c', 0), ('a', 1), ('a', 2), ('a', 3), ('a', 4), ('b', 1), ('b', 2), ('b', 3), ('b', 4), ('c', 3)]
>>> lop = [['c',0], ['a',1], ['b',1], ['a',2], ['b',2], ['a', 3], ['b', 3], ['c', 3], ['c', 4], ['a', 4], ['b', 4]]
>>> print groupPreserveSorted(lop)
[('c', 0), ('a', 1), ('a', 2), ('a', 3), ('b', 1), ('b', 2), ('b', 3), ('c', 3), ('c', 4), ('a', 4), ('b', 4)]
"""
groupCount = 0
groupMap = {} #map contains the "level" to the highest group
maxGroupDic = {} #this contains a map from tup[1] to the highest level attained by tup[1]
groupTypeToMapItem = {} #this contains all the levels that items in tup[0] are placed on
for groupType, dependencyGroup in listOfPairs:
if groupCount == 0:
groupMap[0] = [(groupType, dependencyGroup)]
maxGroupDic[dependencyGroup] = 0
groupTypeToMapItem[groupType] = [0]
groupCount+=1
else:
if groupType not in groupTypeToMapItem:#need to make new group
groupMap[groupCount] = [(groupType, dependencyGroup)]
maxGroupDic[dependencyGroup] = groupCount
groupTypeToMapItem[groupType] = [groupCount]
groupCount+=1
else:
maxGroupTypeItem = groupTypeToMapItem[groupType][-1]
if dependencyGroup in maxGroupDic: #then we just need to check where to add to a new level or to an old level
maxItem = maxGroupDic[dependencyGroup]
if maxItem>maxGroupTypeItem: #then we need to make a enw group
groupMap[groupCount] = [(groupType, dependencyGroup)]
maxGroupDic[dependencyGroup] = groupCount
groupTypeToMapItem[groupType] = [groupCount]
groupCount+=1
else:
countToUse = [item for item in groupTypeToMapItem[groupType] if item>=maxItem][0]
groupMap[countToUse].append((groupType, dependencyGroup))
maxGroupDic[dependencyGroup]=countToUse
else: #we haven't added this groupType yet just add to lowest level
countToUse = groupTypeToMapItem[groupType][0]
groupMap[countToUse].append((groupType, dependencyGroup))
maxGroupDic[dependencyGroup]=countToUse
return flatten([groupMap[count] for count in xrange(groupCount)], depth = 1)
这是一个很好的解决方案,因为它是 o(n),但它绝对不是最干净的答案:)
【问题讨论】:
-
['c01', 'a11', 'a21', 'c31', 'b12', 'b22', 'b32', 'c23', 'a33']可以成为您数据的可能解决方案吗?如果是,我可以为您的问题提供可能的解决方案 -
是的,理论上可行。我只是写了一个不太优雅的解决方案。你的解决方案是什么?
标签: python grouping graph-theory topological-sort