来自sparse.compressed
class _cs_matrix # common for csr and csc
def _mul_sparse_matrix(self, other):
M, K1 = self.shape
K2, N = other.shape
major_axis = self._swap((M,N))[0]
other = self.__class__(other) # convert to this format
idx_dtype = get_index_dtype((self.indptr, self.indices,
other.indptr, other.indices),
maxval=M*N)
indptr = np.empty(major_axis + 1, dtype=idx_dtype)
fn = getattr(_sparsetools, self.format + '_matmat_pass1')
fn(M, N,
np.asarray(self.indptr, dtype=idx_dtype),
np.asarray(self.indices, dtype=idx_dtype),
np.asarray(other.indptr, dtype=idx_dtype),
np.asarray(other.indices, dtype=idx_dtype),
indptr)
nnz = indptr[-1]
idx_dtype = get_index_dtype((self.indptr, self.indices,
other.indptr, other.indices),
maxval=nnz)
indptr = np.asarray(indptr, dtype=idx_dtype)
indices = np.empty(nnz, dtype=idx_dtype)
data = np.empty(nnz, dtype=upcast(self.dtype, other.dtype))
fn = getattr(_sparsetools, self.format + '_matmat_pass2')
fn(M, N, np.asarray(self.indptr, dtype=idx_dtype),
np.asarray(self.indices, dtype=idx_dtype),
self.data,
np.asarray(other.indptr, dtype=idx_dtype),
np.asarray(other.indices, dtype=idx_dtype),
other.data,
indptr, indices, data)
return self.__class__((data,indices,indptr),shape=(M,N))
similarities 是一个稀疏的 csr 矩阵。 other,diag 矩阵,在
other = self.__class__(other)
csr_matmat_pass1(编译代码)使用来自self 和other 的索引运行,返回nnz,即输出中非零项的数量。
然后分配indptr、indices 和data 数组,这些数组将保存来自csr_matmat_pass2 的结果。这些用于创建返回矩阵
self.__class__((data,indices,indptr),shape=(M,N))
创建data数组时出错:
data = np.empty(nnz, dtype=upcast(self.dtype, other.dtype))
返回结果中的非零值太多了。
m 和 similarities.nnz 是什么?
有足够的内存来做similarities.copy()吗?
当您使用similarities *= ... 时,首先必须使用similarities * other。然后结果将替换self。它不会尝试进行就地乘法。
按列就地迭代
关于按行(或按列)更快地迭代,寻求执行排序或获取最大行值之类的事情,存在很多问题。直接使用csr 属性可以大大加快速度。我认为这个想法在这里适用
例子:
In [275]: A = sparse.random(10,10,.2,'csc').astype(int)
In [276]: A.data[:] = np.arange(1,21)
In [277]: A.A
Out[277]:
array([[ 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 10, 0, 0, 16, 18],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 11, 14, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, 12, 0, 0, 17, 0],
[ 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 5, 7, 0, 0, 0, 15, 0, 19],
[ 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 20]])
In [280]: B = sparse.diags(np.arange(1,11),dtype=int)
In [281]: B
Out[281]:
<10x10 sparse matrix of type '<class 'numpy.int64'>'
with 10 stored elements (1 diagonals) in DIAgonal format>
In [282]: (A*B).A
Out[282]:
array([[ 0, 0, 12, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 60, 0, 0, 144, 180],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 66, 98, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 40, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 45, 72, 0, 0, 153, 0],
[ 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 78, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 15, 28, 0, 0, 0, 120, 0, 190],
[ 0, 0, 18, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 200]], dtype=int64)
在列上进行就地迭代:
In [283]: A1=A.copy()
In [284]: for i,j,v in zip(A1.indptr[:-1],A1.indptr[1:],np.arange(1,11)):
...: A1.data[i:j] *= v
...:
In [285]: A1.A
Out[285]:
array([[ 0, 0, 12, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 60, 0, 0, 144, 180],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 66, 98, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 40, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 45, 72, 0, 0, 153, 0],
[ 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 78, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 15, 28, 0, 0, 0, 120, 0, 190],
[ 0, 0, 18, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 200]])
时间比较:
In [287]: %%timeit A1=A.copy()
...: A1 *= B
...:
375 µs ± 1.29 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000 loops each)
In [288]: %%timeit A1 = A.copy()
...: for i,j,v in zip(A1.indptr[:-1],A1.indptr[1:],np.arange(1,11)):
...: A1.data[i:j] *= v
...:
79.9 µs ± 1.47 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000 loops each)