【发布时间】:2016-11-07 09:55:04
【问题描述】:
编辑:重新制定这个问题,因为我已经设法让基础知识发挥作用,但仍然遇到问题。
我正在尝试使用 usb-vhci 模拟 USB 设备(条形码扫描仪)以进行测试,但遇到了一些问题。
给出一些上下文:该设备是一个 CDC 抽象调制解调器,客户端 - 一个 java 程序 - 使用 AT 命令通过串行线路与其通信。
基本上,我的设备已启动并运行,它可以正确注册自己,并且我能够接收来自客户端的命令并做出响应。
主要问题似乎是,一旦设备启动或从主机接收批量传输,它就会触发正在进行的批量传输流和中断 IN 传输(大量,我的 usbmon 日志在几秒钟内增长到 100 MB秒)。
首先在启动时,它不断喷出(主要是)批量 IN 传输,直到我收到 SET_CONTROL_LINE_STATE 请求,然后它们停止。然后,当客户端发送命令(通过串行设备的 AT 命令)时,它会再次启动。
我猜这是因为我没有正确响应某些传输,但我不知道它是什么。
我一直在将我的设备的 usbmon 输出与真实设备的输出进行比较,但到目前为止,我还没有发现任何差异来解释为什么我的模拟设备表现得像这样,而真实设备却没有。 t.
我基本上从 libusb_vhci/examples/virtual_device2.c 中的示例代码开始,并对其进行了修改以模拟实际设备。首先是设备描述符:
const uint8_t dev_desc[] = {
/* Device Descriptor */
0x12, //bLength 18
0x01, //bDescriptorType 1
0x00, 0x02, //bcdUSB 2.00
0x02, //bDeviceClass 2 Communications
0x00, //bDeviceSubClass 0
0x00, //bDeviceProtocol 0
0x40, //bMaxPacketSize0 64
0x5a, 0x06, //idVendor 065a
0x02, 0xa0, //idProduct a002
0x00, 0x01, //bcdDevice 1.00
0x00, //iManufacturer 0
0x01, //iProduct 1
0x00, //iSerial 0
0x01 //bNumConfigurations 1
};
const uint8_t conf_desc[] = {
/* Configuration Descriptor */
0x09, //bLength 9
0x02, //bDescriptorType 2
0x43, 0x00, //wTotalLength 67 ??
0x02, //bNumInterfaces 2
0x01, //bConfigurationValue 1
0x00, //iConfiguration 0
0x80, //bmAttributes (Bus Powered) 0x80
250, //MaxPower 500mA
/* Interface Descriptor 0 */
0x09, //bLength 9
0x04, //bDescriptorType 4
0x00, //bInterfaceNumber 0
0x00, //bAlternateSetting 0
0x01, //bNumEndpoints 1
0x02, //bInterfaceClass 2 Communications
0x02, //bInterfaceSubClass 2 Abstract (modem)
0x00, //bInterfaceProtocol 0 None
0x00, //iInterface 0
/* CDC Header */
0x05, //bLength 7
0x24, //bDescriptorType 5
0x00, //bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT
0x10, //bcdCDC 1.10
0x01, //"
/* CDC Call Management */
0x05, //bLength 3
0x24, //CDC_CS_INTERFACE
0x01, //CDC_CALL_MANAGEMENT
0x01, //bmCapabilities 0x01
0x00, //bDataInterface 0
/* CDC ACM */
0x04, //bLength 2
0x24, //CDC_CS_INTERFACE
0x02, //CDC_ABSTRACT_CONTROL_MANAGEMENT
0x02, //bmCapabilities 0x02
/* CDC Union */
0x05, //bLength 3
0x24, //CDC_CS_INTERFACE
0x06, //CDC_UNION
0x00, //bMasterInterface 0
0x01, //bSlaveInterface 1
/* Endpoint Descriptor */
0x07, //bLength 7
0x05, //bDescriptorType 5
0x83, //bEndpointAddress 0x83 EP 3 IN
0x03, //bmAttributes 3
0x40, 0x00, //wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
0x0a, //bInterval 10
/* Interface Descriptor 1 */
0x09, //bLength 9
0x04, //bDescriptorType 4
0x01, //bInterfaceNumber 1
0x00, //bAlternateSetting 0
0x02, //bNumEndpoints 2
0x0a, //bInterfaceClass 10 CDC Data
0x00, //bInterfaceSubClass 0
0x00, //bInterfaceProtocol 0
0x00, //iInterface 0
/* Endpoint Descriptor */
0x07, //bLength 7
0x05, //bDescriptorType 5
0x01, //bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT
0x02, //bmAttributes 2
0x40, 0x00, //wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
0x00, //bInterval 0
/* Endpoint Descriptor */
0x07, //bLength 7
0x05, //bDescriptorType 5
0x82, //bEndpointAddress 0x82 EP 2 IN
0x02, //bmAttributes 2
0x40,0x00, //wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
0x00 //bInterval 0
};
const uint8_t str0_desc[] = {
0x04, //bLength 4
0x03, //bDescriptorType 3
0x09, 0x04 //bLanguage 0409 US
};
const uint8_t *str1_desc =
(uint8_t *)"\x36\x03O\0p\0t\0i\0c\0o\0n\0 \0U\0S\0B\00\0B\0a\0r\0c\0o\0d\0e\0 \0R\0e\0a\0d\0e\0r";
main 函数与示例中的相同,但主要更改了 process_urb() 函数。控制部分基本完好,但我为一些额外的设置数据包添加了处理:
uint8_t rt = urb->bmRequestType;
uint8_t r = urb->bRequest;
if(rt == 0x00 && r == URB_RQ_SET_CONFIGURATION)
{
devlog("URB_RQ_SET_CONFIGURATION\n");
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
}
else if(rt == 0x00 && r == URB_RQ_SET_INTERFACE)
{
devlog("URB_RQ_SET_INTERFACE\n");
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
}
else if (rt == 0x21 && r == 0x20)
{
devlog("URB_CDC_SET_LINE_CODING\n");
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
}
else if (rt == 0x21 && r == 0x22)
{
devlog("URB_CDC_SET_CONTROL_LINE_STATE\n");
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
}
else if(rt == 0x80 && r == URB_RQ_GET_DESCRIPTOR)
{
int l = urb->wLength;
uint8_t *buffer = urb->buffer;
devlog("GET_DESCRIPTOR ");
switch(urb->wValue >> 8)
{
case 0:
puts("WTF_DESCRIPTOR");
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
break;
case 1:
puts("DEV_DESC");
if(dev_desc[0] < l) l = dev_desc[0];
memcpy(buffer, dev_desc, l);
urb->buffer_actual = l;
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
break;
case 2:
puts("CONF_DESC");
if(conf_desc[2] < l) l = conf_desc[2];
memcpy(buffer, conf_desc, l);
urb->buffer_actual = l;
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
break;
case 3:
devlog(" Reading string %d\n", urb->wValue & 0xff);
switch(urb->wValue & 0xff)
{
case 0:
if(str0_desc[0] < l) l = str0_desc[0];
memcpy(buffer, str0_desc, l);
urb->buffer_actual = l;
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
break;
case 1:
if(str1_desc[0] < l) l = str1_desc[0];
memcpy(buffer, str1_desc, l);
urb->buffer_actual = l;
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
break;
default:
devlog(" Trying to read unknown string: %d\n",urb->wValue & 0xff);
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_STALL;
break;
}
break;
default:
devlog(" UNKNOWN: wValue=%d (%d)\n",urb->wValue, urb->wValue >> 8);
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_STALL;
break;
}
}
else
{
devlog("OTHER bmRequestType %x bRequest %x\n", rt, r);
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_STALL;
}
主要问题在于处理非控制传输。这是我当前的实现:
/* handle non-control sequences */
if(!usb_vhci_is_control(urb->type)) {
/* if we have a BULK OUT transfer */
if (usb_vhci_is_bulk(urb->type) && usb_vhci_is_out(urb->epadr)) {
/* we have a bulk out transfer, i.e. a command from client */
int cmd = get_at_command(urb->buffer, urb->buffer_actual);
if (cmd == COMMAND_Z1) {
/* we have request for version, need to wait for the BULK IN transfer */
last_command = cmd;
}
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
return;
}
/* if we have a BULK IN transfer */
if (usb_vhci_is_bulk(urb->type) && usb_vhci_is_in(urb->epadr)) {
/* we have a BULK IN transfer, use it to respond to any buffered commands */
if (last_command) {
/* send version */
memcpy(urb->buffer, VERSION_STR, strlen(VERSION_STR));
urb->buffer_actual = strlen(VERSION_STR);
last_command = 0;
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
return;
}
}
urb->status = USB_VHCI_STATUS_SUCCESS;
return;
}
这是我在设备启动时得到的 usbmon 日志的 sn-p:
ffff880510727900 266671312 S Bi:5:002:2 -115 128 <
ffff880510727f00 266671315 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
ffff880510727f00 266671316 S Bi:5:002:2 -115 128 <
ffff880510727cc0 266671319 C Ii:5:002:3 0:8 0
ffff880510727cc0 266671321 S Ii:5:002:3 -115:8 64 <
ffff880514d80900 266671323 S Co:5:002:0 s 21 22 0000 0000 0000 0
ffff880510727780 266671324 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
ffff880510727780 266671325 S Bi:5:002:2 -115 128 <
ffff8805101096c0 266671329 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
ffff8805101096c0 266671333 S Bi:5:002:2 -115 128 <
ffff8805107273c0 266671339 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
ffff8805107273c0 266671344 S Bi:5:002:2 -115 128 <
ffff880510109b40 266671348 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
ffff880510109b40 266671350 S Bi:5:002:2 -115 128 <
ffff880510109000 266671354 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
ffff880510109000 266671357 S Bi:5:002:2 -115 128 <
ffff880510727d80 266671360 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
ffff880510727d80 266671361 S Bi:5:002:2 -115 128 <
ffff880510109a80 266671363 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
ffff880510109c00 266671370 C Bi:5:002:2 0 0
...
所以,这基本上是我卡住的地方。我有一个几乎可以正常工作的设备,但是大量的传输基本上会阻塞我的系统,使其无用。任何帮助或信息将不胜感激!
【问题讨论】: