【发布时间】:2015-04-27 19:06:41
【问题描述】:
为什么 aggregate() 在这里不起作用?
> aggregate(cbind(var1 = 1:10, var2 = 101:110),
by=list(range=cut(1:10, breaks=c(2,4,8,10))),
FUN = function(x)
{
c(obs=length(x[, "var2"]), avg=mean(x[, "var2"]), sd=dev(x[, "var2"]))
})
Error in x[, "var2"] (from #1) : incorrect number of dimensions
> cbind(var1 = 1:10, var2 = 101:110)[, "var2"]
[1] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
更新
运行正确版本后返回的 aggregate() 值:
> r = aggregate(data.frame(var1 = 1:10, var2 = 101:110), by=list(range=cut(1:10, breaks=c(2,4,8,10))), FUN = function(x) { c(obs=length(x), avg=mean(x), sd=sd(x)) })
> class(r)
[1] "data.frame"
> dim(r)
[1] 3 3
> r[,1]
[1] (2,4] (4,8] (8,10]
Levels: (2,4] (4,8] (8,10]
> r[,2]
obs avg sd
[1,] 2 3.5 0.707107
[2,] 4 6.5 1.290994
[3,] 2 9.5 0.707107
> r[,3]
obs avg sd
[1,] 2 103.5 0.707107
[2,] 4 106.5 1.290994
[3,] 2 109.5 0.707107
> class(r[,2])
[1] "matrix"
> class(r[,3])
[1] "matrix"
【问题讨论】:
-
cbind带有数字参数返回一个矩阵,而不是一个数据框。而且您不会期望在提供给 FUN 的匿名函数中指定列名。