【问题标题】:Retraining Custom VGGFace Model Yields Random Results重新训练自定义 VGGFace 模型会产生随机结果
【发布时间】:2020-05-14 04:57:47
【问题描述】:

我正在尝试将使用 VGGFace 权重的微调 VGGFace 模型与完全重新训练的模型进行比较。当我使用微调模型时,我得到了不错的准确度分数。然而,当我通过解冻权重来重新训练整个模型时,准确度变得接近随机。

我在猜测是不是因为使用了小数据集?我知道 VGGFace 接受了数百万个样本的训练,而我的数据集只有 1400 个样本(对于二元分类问题,每个类 700 个)。但我只是想确定我是否正确加入了 VGGFace 模型和我的自定义模型。是否也可能是由于学习率太快?

使用以下代码设置模型。

def Train_VGG_Model(train_layers=False):
    print('='*65);K.clear_session()
    vggface_model=VGGFace(model='vgg16')
    x=vggface_model.get_layer('fc7/relu').output
    x=Dense(512,name='custom_fc8')(x)
    x=Activation('relu',name='custom_fc8/relu')(x)
    x=Dense(64,name='custom_fc9')(x)
    x=Activation('relu',name='custom_fc9/relu')(x)
    x=Dense(1,name='custom_fc10')(x)
    out=Activation('sigmoid',name='custom_fc10/sigmoid')(x)
    custom_model=Model(vggface_model.input,out,
                       name='Custom VGGFace Model')
    for layer in custom_model.layers:
        if 'custom_' not in layer.name:
            layer.trainable=train_layers
        elif 'custom_' in layer.name:
            layer.trainable=True
        print('Layer name:',layer.name,
              '... Trainable:',layer.trainable)
    print('='*65);opt=optimizers.Adam(lr=1e-5)
    custom_model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy',
                         metrics=['accuracy'],
                         optimizer=opt')
    custom_model.summary()
    return custom_model

callbacks=[EarlyStopping(monitor='val_loss',patience=1,mode='auto')]
model=Train_VGG_Model(train_layers=train_layers)
model.fit(X_train,y_train,batch_size=32,epochs=100,
callbacks=callbacks,validation_data=(X_valid,y_valid))

输出:

Layer name: input_1 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv1_1 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv1_2 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: pool1 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv2_1 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv2_2 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: pool2 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv3_1 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv3_2 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv3_3 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: pool3 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv4_1 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv4_2 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv4_3 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: pool4 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv5_1 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv5_2 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: conv5_3 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: pool5 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: flatten ... Trainable: True
Layer name: fc6 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: fc6/relu ... Trainable: True
Layer name: fc7 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: fc7/relu ... Trainable: True
Layer name: custom_fc8 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: custom_fc8/relu ... Trainable: True
Layer name: custom_fc9 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: custom_fc9/relu ... Trainable: True
Layer name: custom_fc10 ... Trainable: True
Layer name: custom_fc10/sigmoid ... Trainable: True
=================================================================
Model: "Custom VGGFace Model"
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
input_1 (InputLayer)         (None, 224, 224, 3)       0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv1_1 (Conv2D)             (None, 224, 224, 64)      1792      
_________________________________________________________________
conv1_2 (Conv2D)             (None, 224, 224, 64)      36928     
_________________________________________________________________
pool1 (MaxPooling2D)         (None, 112, 112, 64)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2_1 (Conv2D)             (None, 112, 112, 128)     73856     
_________________________________________________________________
conv2_2 (Conv2D)             (None, 112, 112, 128)     147584    
_________________________________________________________________
pool2 (MaxPooling2D)         (None, 56, 56, 128)       0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv3_1 (Conv2D)             (None, 56, 56, 256)       295168    
_________________________________________________________________
conv3_2 (Conv2D)             (None, 56, 56, 256)       590080    
_________________________________________________________________
conv3_3 (Conv2D)             (None, 56, 56, 256)       590080    
_________________________________________________________________
pool3 (MaxPooling2D)         (None, 28, 28, 256)       0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv4_1 (Conv2D)             (None, 28, 28, 512)       1180160   
_________________________________________________________________
conv4_2 (Conv2D)             (None, 28, 28, 512)       2359808   
_________________________________________________________________
conv4_3 (Conv2D)             (None, 28, 28, 512)       2359808   
_________________________________________________________________
pool4 (MaxPooling2D)         (None, 14, 14, 512)       0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv5_1 (Conv2D)             (None, 14, 14, 512)       2359808   
_________________________________________________________________
conv5_2 (Conv2D)             (None, 14, 14, 512)       2359808   
_________________________________________________________________
conv5_3 (Conv2D)             (None, 14, 14, 512)       2359808   
_________________________________________________________________
pool5 (MaxPooling2D)         (None, 7, 7, 512)         0         
_________________________________________________________________
flatten (Flatten)            (None, 25088)             0         
_________________________________________________________________
fc6 (Dense)                  (None, 4096)              102764544 
_________________________________________________________________
fc6/relu (Activation)        (None, 4096)              0         
_________________________________________________________________
fc7 (Dense)                  (None, 4096)              16781312  
_________________________________________________________________
fc7/relu (Activation)        (None, 4096)              0         
_________________________________________________________________
custom_fc8 (Dense)           (None, 512)               2097664   
_________________________________________________________________
custom_fc8/relu (Activation) (None, 512)               0         
_________________________________________________________________
custom_fc9 (Dense)           (None, 64)                32832     
_________________________________________________________________
custom_fc9/relu (Activation) (None, 64)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
custom_fc10 (Dense)          (None, 1)                 65        
_________________________________________________________________
custom_fc10/sigmoid (Activat (None, 1)                 0         
=================================================================
Total params: 136,391,105
Trainable params: 136,391,105
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________
Train on 784 samples, validate on 336 samples
Epoch 1/100
784/784 [==============================] - 235s 300ms/step - loss: 0.7987 - accuracy: 0.5051 - val_loss: 0.6932 - val_accuracy: 0.5149
Epoch 2/100
784/784 [==============================] - 233s 298ms/step - loss: 0.6935 - accuracy: 0.4605 - val_loss: 0.6932 - val_accuracy: 0.4792
Epoch 3/100
784/784 [==============================] - 236s 301ms/step - loss: 0.6932 - accuracy: 0.5089 - val_loss: 0.6932 - val_accuracy: 0.4792
280/280 [==============================] - 12s 45ms/step

提前谢谢,如果我的问题没有意义,请原谅。我对此很陌生。

【问题讨论】:

    标签: python keras conv-neural-network vgg-net keras-vggface


    【解决方案1】:

    如果您已经有一个用足够大的数据集训练的好权重,那么最好只微调/训练最后几层并冻结之前的层。

    对于任何卷积神经网络,初始层都用作特征提取器,良好的预训练模型已经为足够好的数据集学习了最佳特征。

    一旦您尝试重新训练整个模型,您就会丢掉所有东西。该模型将尝试转向您拥有的新数据集(可能它更小并且不像原始数据集那样具有良好的分布)。这会使模型表现不佳。

    如果你真的想训练整个模型,你可以尝试的另一件事是,对于初始层,选择一个非常小的学习率(1e-5 到 1e-6),对于最后一层,选择类似(1e -3)。

    【讨论】:

    • 感谢您的建议!实际上,我尝试从 Keras(不是 VGGFace)从头开始重新训练整个 VGG16 模型,结果很好,即高于机会水平。 VGG16 和 VGGFace 应该基于相同的 VGG16 架构,所以我不明白为什么当我在 Keras 中加载 VGG16 模型时它做得很好,但在这里,当我从 VGGFace 加载 VGG16 模型时却不是。可能是由于权重初始化吗? IE。当我解冻砝码时,它不会扔掉原来的砝码吗?谢谢!
    • 所以我用较小的学习率再次训练,它奏效了。我也尝试过使用 GPU 而不是 CPU,不确定它是否会有所作为。
    • 是的,这是有道理的。 GPU 可以有所作为,但主要是通过减少训练时间,在某些情况下,它也可以带来更好的性能,因为 GPU 算法的编写方式与 CPU 算法略有不同。
    猜你喜欢
    • 1970-01-01
    • 2021-01-12
    • 1970-01-01
    • 2021-12-15
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 2019-07-11
    相关资源
    最近更新 更多