【发布时间】:2018-04-23 14:50:31
【问题描述】:
我准备了一个简单的SQL Fiddle 来演示我的问题 -
在 PostgreSQL 10.3 中,我将用户信息、两人游戏和移动存储在以下 3 个表中:
CREATE TABLE players (
uid SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name text NOT NULL
);
CREATE TABLE games (
gid SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
player1 integer NOT NULL REFERENCES players ON DELETE CASCADE,
player2 integer NOT NULL REFERENCES players ON DELETE CASCADE
);
CREATE TABLE moves (
mid BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
uid integer NOT NULL REFERENCES players ON DELETE CASCADE,
gid integer NOT NULL REFERENCES games ON DELETE CASCADE,
played timestamptz NOT NULL
);
假设有 2 位玩家 Alice 和 Bob 已经玩了 3 场比赛:
INSERT INTO players (name) VALUES ('Alice'), ('Bob');
INSERT INTO games (player1, player2) VALUES (1, 2);
INSERT INTO games (player1, player2) VALUES (1, 2);
INSERT INTO games (player1, player2) VALUES (1, 2);
让我们假设第一场比赛打得很快,每分钟都在走棋。
但后来他们冷了 :-) 玩了 2 场慢速游戏,每 10 分钟移动一次:
INSERT INTO moves (uid, gid, played) VALUES
(1, 1, now() + interval '1 min'),
(2, 1, now() + interval '2 min'),
(1, 1, now() + interval '3 min'),
(2, 1, now() + interval '4 min'),
(1, 1, now() + interval '5 min'),
(2, 1, now() + interval '6 min'),
(1, 2, now() + interval '10 min'),
(2, 2, now() + interval '20 min'),
(1, 2, now() + interval '30 min'),
(2, 2, now() + interval '40 min'),
(1, 2, now() + interval '50 min'),
(2, 2, now() + interval '60 min'),
(1, 3, now() + interval '110 min'),
(2, 3, now() + interval '120 min'),
(1, 3, now() + interval '130 min'),
(2, 3, now() + interval '140 min'),
(1, 3, now() + interval '150 min'),
(2, 3, now() + interval '160 min');
在一个包含游戏统计信息的网页上,我想显示每个玩家移动之间的平均时间。
所以我想我必须使用 PostgreSQL 的LAG window function。
由于可以同时玩多个游戏,我正在尝试PARTITION BY gid(即通过“游戏 id”)。
不幸的是,我的 SQL 查询出现语法错误窗口函数调用不能嵌套:
SELECT AVG(played - LAG(played) OVER (PARTITION BY gid order by played))
OVER (PARTITION BY gid order by played)
FROM moves
-- trying to calculate average thinking time for player Alice
WHERE uid = 1;
更新:
由于我的数据库中的游戏数量很大并且每天都在增长,我已经尝试(这里是新的SQL Fiddle)在内部选择查询中添加一个条件:
SELECT AVG(played - prev_played)
FROM (SELECT m.*,
LAG(m.played) OVER (PARTITION BY m.gid ORDER BY played) AS prev_played
FROM moves m
JOIN games g ON (m.uid in (g.player1, g.player2))
WHERE m.played > now() - interval '1 month'
) m
WHERE uid = 1;
但是由于某种原因,这会将返回值彻底更改为 1 分 45 秒。
我想知道,为什么内部 SELECT 查询突然返回更多行,可能是我的 JOIN 中缺少某些条件?
更新 2:
哦,好吧,我明白为什么平均值减少了:通过具有相同时间戳的多行(即played - prev_played = 0),但是如何修复 JOIN?
更新 3:
没关系,我的 SQL JOIN 中缺少 m.gid = g.gid AND 条件 now it works:
SELECT AVG(played - prev_played)
FROM (SELECT m.*,
LAG(m.played) OVER (PARTITION BY m.gid ORDER BY played) AS prev_played
FROM moves m
JOIN games g ON (m.gid = g.gid AND m.uid in (g.player1, g.player2))
WHERE m.played > now() - interval '1 month'
) m
WHERE uid = 1;
【问题讨论】:
-
期望的结果会有所帮助。
-
两个玩家的期望结果是 7 分钟
(1 + 10 + 10) / 3。在我的网页上,我想列出每个玩家的移动速度有多慢或多快。 -
10 会是第二场和第三场比赛的平均移动时间吗?
-
是的,但我只想打印 1 个值:玩家执行所有动作的平均思考时间,即 7 分钟。
-
我认为 m.uid 不会过滤太多。现在更大的过滤器是
m.played > now()...我想你想要这个版本sqlfiddle.com/#!17/73a57/32只需加入uid =1是玩家1或玩家2的游戏
标签: sql postgresql average moving-average postgresql-10