【发布时间】:2015-04-12 00:25:08
【问题描述】:
为什么这段代码的时间复杂度是 O(xnm)?
这段代码的时间复杂度是渐近紧密的吗?
为什么?
#include<conio.h>
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int a[10][10], b[10][10], c[10][10];
int x, y, i, j, m, n;
cout << "\nEnter the number of rows and columns for Matrix A:::\n\n";
cin >> x >> y;
// x denotes number rows in matrix A
// y denotes number columns in matrix A
cout << "\n\nEnter elements for Matrix A :::\n\n";
for (i = 0; i < x; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < y; j++)
{
cin >> a[i][j];
}
cout << "\n";
}
cout << "\n\nMatrix A :\n\n";
for (i = 0; i < x; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < y; j++)
{
cout << "\t" << a[i][j];
}
cout << "\n\n";
}
cout << "\n-----------------------------------------------------------\n";
cout << "\nEnter the number of rows and columns for Matrix B:::\n\n";
cin >> m >> n;
// m denotes number rows in matrix B
// n denotes number columns in matrix B
cout << "\n\nEnter elements for Matrix B :::\n\n";
for (i = 0; i < m; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
{
cin >> b[i][j];
}
cout << "\n";
}
cout << "\n\nMatrix B :\n\n";
for (i = 0; i < m; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
{
cout << "\t" << b[i][j];
}
cout << "\n\n";
}
if (y == m)
{
for (i = 0; i < x; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
{
c[i][j] = 0;
for (int k = 0; k < m; k++)
{
c[i][j] = c[i][j] + a[i][k] * b[k][j];
}
}
}
cout
<< "\n-----------------------------------------------------------\n";
cout << "\n\nMultiplication of Matrix A and Matrix B :\n\n";
for (i = 0; i < x; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
{
cout << "\t" << c[i][j];
}
cout << "\n\n";
}
}
else
{
cout << "\n\nMultiplication is not possible";
}
getch();
return 0;
}
【问题讨论】:
-
你的代码格式是一个巨大的混乱
-
“紧密度”是绑定的属性,而不是代码的属性。如果同一界限既是上限又是下限,则它是紧界。例如,如果时间复杂度至多是线性的并且至少是线性的,那么你有一个严格的界限。如果你只知道一个上限,那么可能会发现有一个你不知道的更小的上限。如果上限也是不可能发生的下限 - 你的上限不可能太高(或你的下限太低),所以这是一个严格的界限。
标签: c++ big-o complexity-theory