【发布时间】:2017-10-04 08:17:21
【问题描述】:
我尝试解决hackerrank中的一个问题,即在数组中找到具有最大度数的最小子数组的长度。数组的最大度数是具有最大频率的元素的计数。例如,考虑示例 {2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1},最小子数组长度为 4,因为 2 的度数最大,而度数为 3 的最小子数组是 {2, 2, 1, 2}
下面是我的解决方案
public class FindingMinSubArrayWithDegree {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
int n = sc.nextInt();
int[] arr = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
arr[i] = sc.nextInt();
}
System.out.println(degreeOfArray(arr));
sc.close();
}
static int degreeOfArray(int[] arr) {
HashMap<Integer, Integer> numbersByDegree = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
int degree = numbersByDegree.getOrDefault(arr[i], 0);
numbersByDegree.put(arr[i], degree + 1);
}
List<Map.Entry<Integer, Integer>> sortedEntries = sortByValue(numbersByDegree);
int maxDegree = sortedEntries.get(0).getValue();
int[] degreeArr = new int[arr.length] ;
int minSubArrayLength = arr.length;
for (Map.Entry<Integer, Integer> entry : sortedEntries) {
if (entry.getValue() < maxDegree) {
break;
}
boolean startIndexFound = false, endIndexFound = false;
int startIndex = 0, endIndex = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (entry.getKey() == arr[i]) {
if (i - 1 >= 0)
degreeArr[i] = degreeArr[i - 1] + 1;
else
degreeArr[i] = 1;
} else {
if (i - 1 >= 0)
degreeArr[i] = degreeArr[i - 1];
}
if (!startIndexFound && degreeArr[i] == 1) {
startIndex = i;
startIndexFound = true;
}
if (!endIndexFound && degreeArr[i] == entry.getValue()) {
endIndex = i;
endIndexFound = true;
}
if (startIndexFound && endIndexFound)
break;
}
startIndexFound = false; endIndexFound = false;
if ((endIndex - startIndex) < minSubArrayLength) {
minSubArrayLength = endIndex - startIndex;
}
for (int i = 0; i < degreeArr.length; i++)
degreeArr[i] = 0;
}
return minSubArrayLength + 1;
}
private static <K, V extends Comparable<? super V>> List<Map.Entry<K, V>>
sortByValue(Map<K, V> map) {
List<Map.Entry<K, V>> list = new LinkedList<Map.Entry<K, V>>(map.entrySet());
Collections.sort( list, new Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>>() {
public int compare(Map.Entry<K, V> o1, Map.Entry<K, V> o2) {
return (o2.getValue()).compareTo( o1.getValue() );
}
});
return list;
}
}
对于 { 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4} 等输入,这种方法的最坏情况运行时间为 O(N ^ 2)。有没有更好的算法来解决这个问题?
PS - 我尝试在代码审查中提出这个问题,但没有得到任何回应,这就是为什么搬到这里
【问题讨论】:
-
什么是数组的
degree? -
数组的度数是频率最高的元素个数
标签: java arrays algorithm time-complexity