【发布时间】:2016-09-27 08:17:15
【问题描述】:
有一个图 G0 和子图 G1...G7,我想在子图 G1...G7 的集合中找到 G7 的出现,在这种特殊情况下,输出应该是 G7 在 5 中, G7在7 但它不起作用,输出是 G7 在 4 中, G7在6, G7在7。 我真的不明白错误可能出在哪里。(也许是for循环)
#include < boost/config.hpp >
#include < iostream >
#include < boost/graph/subgraph.hpp >
#include < boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp >
#include < boost/graph/graph_utility.hpp >
#include < boost/graph/lookup_edge.hpp >
using namespace boost;
typedef subgraph< adjacency_list < vecS, vecS, directedS,
property < vertex_color_t, int > , property<edge_index_t, int> > > Graph;
int threshold = 3;
int size_of_database = 7;
int main(int,char*[])
{
const int N = 6;
Graph G0(N);
enum { A, B, C, D, E, F}; // for conveniently refering to vertices in G0
Graph& G1 = G0.create_subgraph();
Graph& G2 = G0.create_subgraph();
Graph& G3 = G0.create_subgraph();
Graph& G4 = G0.create_subgraph();
Graph& G5 = G0.create_subgraph();
Graph& G6 = G0.create_subgraph();
Graph& G7 = G0.create_subgraph();
enum { A1, B1, C1 }; // for conveniently refering to vertices in G1
enum { A2, B2 }; // for conveniently refering to vertices in G2
enum { A3, B3 };
enum { A4, B4, C4 };
enum { A5, B5 };
enum { A6, B6, C6 };
enum { A7, B7 };
add_vertex(C, G1); // global vertex C becomes local A1 for G1
add_vertex(E, G1); // global vertex E becomes local B1 for G1
add_vertex(F, G1); // global vertex F becomes local C1 for G1
add_vertex(A, G2); // global vertex A becomes local A1 for G2
add_vertex(B, G2); // global vertex B becomes local B1 for G2
add_vertex(B, G3); // ...-||-...
add_vertex(C, G3);
add_vertex(A, G4);
add_vertex(B, G4);
add_vertex(E, G4);
add_vertex(F, G5);
add_vertex(D, G5);
add_vertex(B, G6);
add_vertex(D, G6);
add_vertex(E, G6);
add_vertex(F, G7);
add_vertex(D, G7);
add_edge(A, B, G0);
add_edge(B, C, G0);
add_edge(B, D, G0);
add_edge(E, B, G0);
add_edge(E, F, G0);
add_edge(F, D, G0);
add_edge(F, C, G1); // (A1,C1) is subgraph G1 local indices for (C,F).
Graph::children_iterator ci, ci_end;
Graph::edge_iterator ei, ei_end;
int nj = 0;
int g_n= 1;
for (tie(ci, ci_end) = G0.children(); ci != ci_end; ++ci){
for (tie(ei, ei_end) = edges(G7); ei != ei_end; ++ei){
if( edge(G7.local_to_global(source(*ei,G7)), G7.local_to_global(target(*ei, G7)), *ci).second ) nj++;
};
if(nj == num_edges(G7)) std::cout<<"G7 is in"<<g_n<<std::endl;
nj = 0;
g_n++;
};
std::cout << "G0:" << std::endl;
print_graph(G0, get(vertex_index, G0));
print_edges2(G0, get(vertex_index, G0), get(edge_index, G0));
std::cout << std::endl;
int num = 1;
for (boost::tie(ci, ci_end) = G0.children(); ci != ci_end; ++ci) {
std::cout << "G" << num++ << ":" << std::endl;
print_graph(*ci, get(vertex_index, *ci));
print_edges2(*ci, get(vertex_index, *ci),get(edge_index, *ci));
std::cout << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
【问题讨论】:
-
你是什么意思,“G7 在 n” - 一个子图在“一个数字”?这没有多大意义
-
我的意思是 G7 在 Gn,对不起
-
add_edge(F, C, G1);行是错误的(正如 valgrind 或 ubsan/asan 会告诉你的) -
所以对于 G7 来说,输出应该是 G7 在 G5 中,G7 在 G7 中,这意味着 G7 是 G5 的子图,也是 G7 的子图(平凡)
-
应该是add_edge(C1,A1,G1),还是为什么错了?