【发布时间】:2021-07-03 05:43:13
【问题描述】:
对于下面的数据框,我想优化总回报,同时满足某些界限。
d = {'Win':[0,0,1, 0, 0, 1, 0],'Men':[0,1,0, 1, 1, 0, 0], 'Women':[1,0,1, 0, 0, 1,1],'Matches' :[0,5,4, 7, 4, 10,13],
'Odds':[1.58,3.8,1.95, 1.95, 1.62, 1.8, 2.1], 'investment':[0,0,6, 10, 5, 25,0],}
data = pd.DataFrame(d)
我想最大化以下方程:
totalreturn = np.sum(data['Odds'] * data['investment'] * (data['Win'] == 1))
函数应该最大化满足以下界限:
for i in range(len(data)):
investment = data['investment'][i]
C = alpha0 + alpha1*data['Men'] + alpha2 * data['Women'] + alpha3 * data['Matches']
if (lb < investment ) & (investment < ub) & (investment > C) == False:
data['investment'][i] = 0
lb 和 ub 对于数据框中的每一行都是常量。但是,每行的阈值 C 是不同的。因此有6个参数需要优化:lb, ub, alph0, alpha1, alpha2, alpha3。
谁能告诉我如何在 python 中做到这一点?到目前为止,我的程序一直使用 scipy (Approach1) 和 Bayesian (Approach2) 优化,并且仅尝试优化 lb 和 ub。
方法1:
import pandas as pd
from scipy.optimize import minimize
def objective(val, data):
# Approach 1
# Lowerbound and upperbound
lb, ub = val
# investments
# These matches/bets are selected to put wager on
tf1 = (data['investment'] > lb) & (data['investment'] < ub)
data.loc[~tf1, 'investment'] = 0
# Total investment
totalinvestment = sum(data['investment'])
# Good placed bets
data['reward'] = data['Odds'] * data['investment'] * (data['Win'] == 1)
totalreward = sum(data['reward'])
# Return and cumalative return
data['return'] = data['reward'] - data['investment']
totalreturn = sum(data['return'])
data['Cum return'] = data['return'].cumsum()
# Return on investment
print('\n',)
print('lb, ub:', lb, ub)
print('TotalReturn: ',totalreturn)
print('TotalInvestment: ', totalinvestment)
print('TotalReward: ', totalreward)
print('# of bets', (data['investment'] != 0).sum())
return totalreturn
# Bounds and contraints
b = (0,100)
bnds = (b,b,)
x0 = [0,100]
sol = minimize(objective, x0, args = (data,), method = 'Nelder-Mead', bounds = bnds)
和方法2:
import pandas as pd
import time
import pickle
from hyperopt import fmin, tpe, Trials
from hyperopt import STATUS_OK
from hyperopt import hp
def objective(args):
# Approach2
# Lowerbound and upperbound
lb, ub = args
# investments
# These matches/bets are selected to put wager on
tf1 = (data['investment'] > lb) & (data['investment'] < ub)
data.loc[~tf1, 'investment'] = 0
# Total investment
totalinvestment = sum(data['investment'])
# Good placed bets
data['reward'] = data['Odds'] * data['investment'] * (data['Win'] == 1)
totalreward = sum(data['reward'])
# Return and cumalative return
data['return'] = data['reward'] - data['investment']
totalreturn = sum(data['return'])
data['Cum return'] = data['return'].cumsum()
# store results
d = {'loss': - totalreturn, 'status': STATUS_OK, 'eval time': time.time(),
'other stuff': {'type': None, 'value': [0, 1, 2]},
'attachments': {'time_module': pickle.dumps(time.time)}}
return d
trials = Trials()
parameter_space = [hp.uniform('lb', 0, 100), hp.uniform('ub', 0, 100)]
best = fmin(objective,
space= parameter_space,
algo=tpe.suggest,
max_evals=500,
trials = trials)
print('\n', trials.best_trial)
有人知道我应该怎么做吗? Scipy 不会产生预期的结果。 Hyperopt 优化确实会产生预期的结果。在这两种方法中,我都不知道如何合并一个依赖于行的边界 (C(i))。
任何事情都会有帮助! (任何关于优化类型的相关文章、练习或有用的解释也非常受欢迎)
【问题讨论】:
-
我相信这是公式化的方式,事物是不可微的。 (lb,ub 的微小变化可能会导致目标的显着跳跃,因为突然观察结果丢失或被添加)。 SLSQP 仅适用于平滑问题。我最初的想法是使用二进制变量来指示是否使用了观察。但这需要非常不同的求解器。
-
感谢您的回答。但是您能否详细说明一下,您认为哪些求解器更适合?
标签: python function optimization scipy bayesian