1.根据前两次的最终结果:
使用普通buffer,Horizontal 5ms, Vertical 17 ms
使用image buffer:Horizontal 9.4ms, Vertical 6.4 ms
那么使用 Horizontal普通buffer,Vertical image buffer 组合方式的话,是不是时间最少?只是Intermediate image仍使用image对象,Horizontal kernel中的写操作需要改变。
结果: Horizontal 的最大local_work_size只能是32, Horizontal 增至8ms, Vertical 6.4ms
const sampler_t sampler = CLK_NORMALIZED_COORDS_FALSE | CLK_ADDRESS_CLAMP_TO_EDGE | CLK_FILTER_NEAREST; #define r(xc,y) read_imagef( source, sampler, (int2) (xc, y) ).x #define w16(x,y,sum) write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x, y), sum.s0 );write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+1, y), sum.s1 );\ write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+2, y), sum.s2 );write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+3, y), sum.s3 );\ write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+4, y), sum.s4 );write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+5, y), sum.s5 );\ write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+6, y), sum.s6 );write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+7, y), sum.s7 );\ write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+8, y), sum.s8 );write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+9, y), sum.s9 );\ write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+10, y), sum.sa );write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+11, y), sum.sb );\ write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+12, y), sum.sc );write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+13, y), sum.sd );\ write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+14, y), sum.se );write_imagef( dest, (int2) (x+15, y), sum.sf ); __kernel __attribute__((work_group_size_hint(32,1,1))) void ImageGaussianFilterHorizontal(__global const uchar* restrict source, // Source image __write_only image2d_t dest, // Intermediate dest image const int imgWidth , // Image width const int imgHeight) { const int y = get_global_id(0); if(y>=(imgHeight)) return; const uchar m_nRightShiftNum = 8; const uchar Rounding = (1 << (m_nRightShiftNum - 1)); const uchar m_nFilter[11] = {1,4,8,16,32,134,32,16,8,4,1}; const int s = 11; const int nStart = 5; const int nWidth = imgWidth; __global const uchar* pInLine = source + y*nWidth; int j; for(j = 0; j < nStart; j ++) { ushort sum = 0; for (int m = 0; m<s / 2; m++) { int k1 = (j + m - nStart); k1 = k1<0 ? -k1 : k1; int k2 = (j + nStart - m ); sum += (pInLine[k1] + pInLine[k2])*m_nFilter[m]; } sum += pInLine[j] * m_nFilter[s / 2]; //sum = (sum + Rounding) >> 8; write_imagef( dest, (int2) (j, y), convert_float(sum)/(255.0*256) ); } ushort16 line0 = convert_ushort16(vload16(0,pInLine+j-nStart)); for ( ; (j+16)<= (nWidth - nStart); j+=16) { ushort16 line1 = convert_ushort16(vload16(0,pInLine+j-nStart+16)); ushort16 temp0; ushort16 temp1; temp0 = line0; temp1.s0123 = line0.sabcd; temp1.s45 = line0.sef; temp1.s67 = line1.s01; temp1.s89abcdef = line1.s23456789; ushort16 sum = ( temp0 + temp1 ) * m_nFilter[0]; temp0.s0123456789abcdef = temp0.s123456789abcdeff; temp0.sf = line1.s0; temp1.s0123456789abcdef = temp1.s00123456789abcde; temp1.s0 = line0.s9; sum += ( temp0 + temp1 ) * m_nFilter[1]; temp0.s0123456789abcdef = temp0.s123456789abcdeff; temp0.sf = line1.s1; temp1.s0123456789abcdef = temp1.s00123456789abcde; temp1.s0 = line0.s8; sum += ( temp0 + temp1 ) * m_nFilter[2]; temp0.s0123456789abcdef = temp0.s123456789abcdeff; temp0.sf = line1.s2; temp1.s0123456789abcdef = temp1.s00123456789abcde; temp1.s0 = line0.s7; sum += ( temp0 + temp1 ) * m_nFilter[3]; temp0.s0123456789abcdef = temp0.s123456789abcdeff; temp0.sf = line1.s3; temp1.s0123456789abcdef = temp1.s00123456789abcde; temp1.s0 = line0.s6; sum += ( temp0 + temp1 ) * m_nFilter[4]; temp0.s0123456789abcdef = temp0.s123456789abcdeff; temp0.sf = line1.s4; sum += ( temp0 ) * m_nFilter[5]; line0 = line1; float16 sum2 = (convert_float16(sum))/(255.0*256); w16(j,y,sum2 ); } for( ; j < nWidth; j ++) { ushort sum = 0; for (int m = 0; m<s / 2; m++) { int k1 = (j + m - nStart); int k2 = (j + nStart - m ); k2 = k2 >= nWidth ? 2 * nWidth - 2 - k2 : k2; sum += (pInLine[k1] + pInLine[k2])*m_nFilter[m]; } sum += pInLine[j] * m_nFilter[s / 2]; //sum = (sum + Rounding) >> m_nRightShiftNum; write_imagef( dest, (int2) (j, y), convert_float(sum)/(255.0*256) ); } }