有任何问题，可以查看 翻译预告 《介绍 GENEVA Beta 1 白皮书》或者直接在这里回复。
It’s important to realize that because all interaction is done in a standard way, none of these technologies specifically requires any of the others. The “Geneva” Server doesn’t require CardSpace “Geneva”, CardSpace “Geneva” doesn’t require the “Geneva” Server, and neither one requires applications to use the “Geneva” Framework. To CardSpace “Geneva”, for example, the “Geneva” Server looks like any other STS, with token requests sent using the standard WS-Trust protocol. Even though all of these technologies are from Microsoft, there are no proprietary links between them—all of the communication is based on industry standards. The goal is to make it easier to use claims-based identity both within the Windows world and across platforms from different vendors.
需要注意的是，所有的这些交互都是通过标准方式，没有哪种技术明确说明需要其他的。 “Geneva”服务器不需要 CardSpace “Geneva”，CardSpace “Geneva” 也不需要 “Geneva” 服务器， 不管哪一个都不需要“Genvea” Framework。 例如， 对于CardSpace “Geneva” ， “Geneva” 服务器看起来和其他STS 没有区别，通过 使用标准的 WS-Trust 协议 发送 令牌（Token）请求。 尽管 这些技术都来至微软，但他们之间没有专用的链接——所有的通讯都是基于工业标准。 目标是 让 使用 基于声明的标识（Claims-Based Identity）变的更简单，无论是 Windows平台还是 跨平台的不同供应商。