alexa中国500
I've read this SitePoint blog post today where the author wonders about the popularity of IIS vs Apache as server software. There is Netcraft as a reliable source of course, but the question was more of "How about the big sites?" and examples of big sites are those in the Alexa ranking.
我今天已经阅读了此SitePoint博客文章 ，作者想知道IIS与Apache作为服务器软件的普及程度。 Netcraft当然是可靠的资源，但问题更多是“大型站点如何？” 大型网站的例子是Alexa排名中的那些网站。
So I took this as a challenge and hacked a quick script to get those stats.
因此，我将其视为挑战，并**了一个快速脚本以获取这些统计数据。
The Methodology I took Alexa top 500 sites from here and made a request to each of them. I logged the "Server" header response. The top 500 sites are actually 499 - from 1 to 500.
方法论我从这里选出Alexa前500个站点，并向每个站点提出了要求。 我记录了“服务器”标头响应。 前500个站点实际上是499个-从1到500。
The execution Slow and painful. Some sites didn't respond at all. Some didn't want to show their server software either sending a blank "Server" header or none at all. To my surprise Yahoo! and Geocities send blank server headers.
执行缓慢而痛苦。 有些网站根本没有响应。 有些人不想显示他们的服务器软件，要么发送空白的“ Server”头，要么根本不发送。 令我惊讶的是，雅虎！ 和Geocities发送空白服务器标头。
The analysis I take all the 499 sites, subtract N/As (non responding or blank server headers). Then I make a select on all servers matching "Apache" and all matching "IIS", as well as some of the others. Then I admire the percentages.
我进行了所有499个站点的分析 ，减去了N / As(无响应或空白的服务器标头)。 然后，在所有匹配“ Apache”和所有匹配“ IIS”的服务器以及其他一些服务器上进行选择。 然后我很欣赏这些百分比。
The results
结果
Some more raw data This is the result of a simple count on the different server header responses. Just as an idea how different they can be. It's available as a CSV and XML file.
更多原始数据这是对不同服务器标头响应进行简单计数的结果。 就像一个想法，他们可以有多大不同。 它以CSV和XML文件的形式提供。
Many thanks! ... to PEAR ???? Its HTTP_Request and DB packages made the coding possible in no time.
非常感谢！ ......到PEAR ????其HTTP_REQUEST和DB包在任何时候作出的编码可能。
Tell your friends about this post on Facebook and Twitter
在Facebook和Twitter上告诉您的朋友有关此帖子的信息
alexa中国500