peer review : Seam Carving*****

O

peer review 需要包含的内容（不要留情，提交之前你对朋友的文章留情了，审稿人会留情？）

整个过程可以用Word的评审模式，也可以直接提交markdown。有的人写论文时用latex,建议使用latex转Word后再交给同学评审。

KR

1. 整体评价
2. 看不懂的地方有哪些？
3. 语法建议
4. 其他补充

1. 整体评价（写在论文题目附近）

1. 创新点评价
（如果对这个方向没了解，可以不用写）
2. 文章可读性评价
（必须要写奥）

3. 补充
（补充一些其他的评价）

2. 单个章节评价(单个章节评价是基于作者描述，不包含个人评价)

absolutely ,yes , may be , not at all , no
introducation:

1. Can you realize this area is important? absolutely
2. Do you understand previous work issus? ok
3. Do you think author work is able to fix this problem ? ok
4. Do you have a clear understand about author idea and breakthrough? ok
5. Do you understand author’s work ? ok

Related work:

1. Does author has a summary ? ok
2. Do you have a clear understand about previous work’s shortcome and main work? yes
3. Do you think related work part have association and judgement. yes
4. Does this article give research questions ? yes

Methods:

1. Does this article give a experimental setup? yes
2. Does this article give a method detail ? absolutely
3. Do your understand whole method detail ? Most of all . 注意力机制，我没了解过，所以不知道注意力机制是怎么实现的。是根据初始状态和其他状态关系求注意力系数， 解决一些少量帧的误判吗？
4. Does this article give clearly explain various statistical methods used for significance testing and the reasons behind the choice.? no ( but find it exist in Experiments and analysis )

Experiments and analysis:

1. Does this article give a detailed experimental detail and procedure ? yes
2. Do you think experiments and analysis is reasonable and logic ? yes
3. Does author writing self method shortcome? ( You will be criticised by the reviewers if you don’t discuss the shortcomings of your research. ) yes .

Conclusion:

1. Does this article give a summary and further research? yes

3. 看不懂的地方

1. 标出自己看不懂的句子或者段落，并给出一些自己的看法。
（必须要写奥，看不懂就直接标注出来，大部分情况下都是作者没表达清楚，这部分对论文提升非常大）

比如： (这些审阅和标注可以在Word阅模式里完成)

这个地方我还是没看懂你数据集怎么分配的，怎么有两个sum?

4. 语法建议

1. 在阅读的时候看到有问题或者可以优化就标出来，不必刻意去找。不是必须要做的。

demo: (这些审阅和标注可以在Word阅模式里完成)

感觉可以改成被动句，太主动了。