【发布时间】:2021-01-12 00:57:57
【问题描述】:
我的目标是创建一个最初具有网格显示的布局,并且对于其中的每个直接子级,具有弹性显示以完美地将其中的项目居中,到目前为止,它成功了,直到我给了一个 .wrapper(第一个父级) 的孩子(.nested) 一些孩子和我给了.nested display: grid;;但由于某种原因,.nested 的 display: grid 被省略,并且没有采用 grid-auto-rows: 100px 属性,这是我的问题。
我到处寻找解决方案,但找不到,有人可以帮我解决这个问题吗?
*{
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
main{
max-width: 100%;
}
.wrapper{
padding: 0 50px;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
grid-gap: 1em;
grid-auto-rows: minmax(100px, auto);
}
.wrapper > div{
background-color: silver;
padding: 1em;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.wrapper > div:nth-child(odd){
background-color: #dbdbdb;
}
.nested{
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr;
grid-gap: 1em;
grid-auto-rows: 100px !important;
}
.wrapper .nested div{
border: 1px solid #000;
padding: 1em;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Title</title>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="box box1">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
<div class="box box2">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
<div class="box box3">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
<div class="box box4">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Accusamus, asperiores at atque beatae cum cupiditate doloremque, error est, eveniet laboriosam nihil officiis pariatur porro rem tempore. A accusamus animi delectus, dolore eaque eveniet impedit maiores molestiae perspiciatis quidem sequi, veniam?
</div>
<div class="box box5">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
<div class="box box6 nested">
<div>lorem</div>
<div>lorem</div>
<div>lorem</div>
<div>lorem</div>
</div>
<div class="box box7">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
<div class="box box8">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
<div class="box box9">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
<div class="box box10">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
<div class="box box11">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit.
</div>
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>
【问题讨论】:
-
不知道为什么我已经 (1) 给了你答案和 (2) 解释了,你为什么还要重复同样的问题