【发布时间】:2019-03-05 23:11:07
【问题描述】:
我创建了一个共享库(在 OSX 上为“dylib”,在 Ubuntu 上为“so”)和一个加载该库的可执行文件。如果我只是将共享库链接到可执行文件(cmake 中的链接库),一切正常。
现在我没有链接它,而是使用 dlopen/dlsym 打开库。在 OSX 上可以正常运行并且可执行文件运行顺利,但在 Linux 上它会在特定点崩溃。这是 valgrind 跟踪:
==7253== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
==7253== at 0x0: ???
==7253== by 0x61DB539: void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<std::thread>::construct<std::thread, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}>(std::thread*, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}&&) (new_allocator.h:136)
==7253== by 0x61D7780: void std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<std::thread> >::construct<std::thread, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}>(std::allocator<std::thread>&, std::thread*, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}&&) (alloc_traits.h:475)
==7253== by 0x61D7840: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::_M_realloc_insert<ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<std::thread*, std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> > >, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:415)
==7253== by 0x61D371D: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::emplace_back<ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}>(ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:105)
==7253== by 0x61D19F5: ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long) (ThreadPool.h:38)
==7253== by 0x112545: main (testexecutable.cpp:216)
==7253== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==7253== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==7253== Bad permissions for mapped region at address 0x0
==7253== at 0x0: ???
==7253== by 0x61DB539: void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<std::thread>::construct<std::thread, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}>(std::thread*, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}&&) (new_allocator.h:136)
==7253== by 0x61D7780: void std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<std::thread> >::construct<std::thread, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}>(std::allocator<std::thread>&, std::thread*, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}&&) (alloc_traits.h:475)
==7253== by 0x61D7840: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::_M_realloc_insert<ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<std::thread*, std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> > >, ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:415)
==7253== by 0x61D371D: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::emplace_back<ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}>(ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long)::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:105)
==7253== by 0x61D19F5: ThreadPool::ThreadPool(unsigned long) (ThreadPool.h:38)
==7253== by 0x112545: main (testexecutable.cpp:216)
代码实际上是这样的:
...
// need to keep track of threads so we can join them
std::vector< std::thread > workers;
// the task queue
std::queue< std::function<void()> > tasks;
...
// the constructor just launches some amount of workers
inline ThreadPool::ThreadPool(size_t threads)
: stop(false)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i<threads; ++i)
workers.emplace_back(
[this]
{
...
而崩溃正是在 emplace_back 调用中。任何想法为什么会发生这种情况? GCC 是 7.3.0,Ubuntu 18.04。
编辑 1
编辑 2
好的,这是解决方案的一部分。我的同事指出,这可能是由于将函数指针 (lambdas) 放置到可执行文件和共享库的不同堆栈上,导致混淆 - 我还无法验证,但这是我发现的:
ldd test
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd6bdc7000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fd8766de000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fd876350000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fd875f5f000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fd876ae5000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007fd875bc1000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fd8759a9000)
没有将 pthread 显示为必需的库。但是共享库引用了 pthread。
ldd liblibrary.so
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc97b74000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007efce4d30000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007efce49a2000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007efce478a000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007efce4399000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007efce515f000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007efce3ffb000)
尽管它被引用,但对共享库中需要 pthread 的函数的任何调用都会导致应用程序崩溃 - 看起来,pthread 库并未加载一点也不。
如果我调用线程进入 main,即
void dummyfunction() {}
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
std::thread dummy(&dummyfunction);
dummy.join();
...
// dlopen/dlsym here...
...
initFunction();
...
// dlclose
return 0;
}
pthread 被添加到库列表中,
ldd test
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffdc7bd0000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f5d13777000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f5d13573000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f5d131e5000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f5d12fcd000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f5d12bdc000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f5d13b9c000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f5d1283e000)
它被加载,并且在共享库中一切正常。
但是为什么 pthread 库没有从共享库中加载呢?
还尝试在 pthread 上的共享库中使用 dlopen,但这不起作用。
【问题讨论】:
-
看起来像是某种空指针解引用(或调用空函数指针)。如需更多信息,请发布实际代码。
-
可能是静态初始化顺序惨败(推迟到
dlopen,而不是在main之前发生)。workers和任务是全局对象吗?它们是什么时候第一次使用的? -
@melpomene 这是实际代码...
-
stackoverflow.com/help/on-topic: "问题寻求调试帮助(“为什么这段代码不起作用?”)必须包括所需的行为、特定的问题或错误以及最短的在问题本身中重现它所必需的代码。没有明确问题陈述的问题对其他读者没有用处。请参阅:如何创建minimal reproducible example。"
-
libpthread.so是“特殊的”……Musl 决定将其与 libc 集成是有原因的。简而言之,总是 直接从可执行文件链接到它。确保您没有将--as-needed传递给链接器,否则-lpthread将被删除。
标签: c++