正如 Gervasio Amy 所建议的,您需要使用 AspectJ,而不是 Spring AOP。如果是Spring环境,可以use AspectJ within Spring代替Spring AOP,这个没问题。如果您还没有使用 Spring,AOP 不是开始使用它的理由,AspectJ 可以在没有 Spring 的简单 Java SE(或 EE)版本中工作。
你需要做的是:
- 使用 AspectJ 编译器ajc 编译 Aspect 代码。 (您也可以用它编译整个应用程序,因为它也是 Java 编译器 javac 的替代品。)
- 创建加载时编织配置aop.xml,以便让您的应用程序在类加载期间将方面代码动态编织到第 3 方库中。我让你来决定如何做到这一点,只需查看LTW documentation。
- 通过
-javaagent:/path/to/aspectjweaver.jar 开关在命令行上使用 AspectJ 编织代理启动您的 JVM 或应用程序服务器。
现在你想要的外观是什么样的?让我们尝试一些变体并细化切入点以使其匹配。但首先让我们用一些示例 3rd 方类(Foo 和 Bar)和一个小驱动程序应用程序(Application)为我们的实验做准备:
示例应用程序和第 3 方代码:
package my.thirdparty.application;
public class Foo {
void blah() {
zot();
}
void foo() {}
void zot() {
foo();
}
}
package my.thirdparty.application;
public class Bar {
Foo foo = new Foo();
public void doSomething() {
someMethod();
bar();
anotherMethod();
}
private void someMethod() {
foo.blah();
foo.foo();
foo.zot();
}
private void bar() {
foo.blah();
// This is the only call we want to intercept, 'foo' called by 'bar'
foo.foo();
foo.zot();
anotherMethod();
}
private void anotherMethod() {
foo.blah();
foo.foo();
foo.zot();
}
}
package de.scrum_master.app;
import my.thirdparty.application.Bar;
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Bar().doSomething();
}
}
如您所见,Application.main 创建了一个Bar 对象并调用了一个公共方法Bar.doSomething。这个方法触发了一系列其他方法调用,其中一些最终以Foo.foo 被间接调用,但只有一个从Bar.bar 到Foo.foo 的直接调用(这是我们感兴趣的根据你的问题)。
方面,第 1 部分:拦截对 Foo.foo 的所有调用
package de.scrum_master.aspect;
import my.thirdparty.application.Foo;
import my.thirdparty.application.Bar;
public aspect MethodInterceptor {
pointcut allCalls() :
call(* Foo.foo(..));
Object around(Foo fooObject) : allCalls() && target(fooObject) {
System.out.println(thisJoinPointStaticPart + " -> caller = " + thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart);
//new Exception("printing stack trace").printStackTrace(System.out);
//System.out.println();
return proceed(fooObject);
}
}
控制台日志:
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.someMethod())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
这是一个好的开始,因为现在我们已经可以拦截所有对Foo.foo 的调用。但是,如何将拦截限制在Bar.bar 的控制流 (cflow) 中进行的那些调用?
方面,第 2 部分:拦截由 Bar.bar 直接(内)发出的对 Foo.foo 的调用
package de.scrum_master.aspect;
import my.thirdparty.application.Foo;
import my.thirdparty.application.Bar;
public aspect MethodInterceptor {
pointcut indirectCalls() :
call(* Foo.foo(..)) && cflow(execution(* Bar.bar(..)));
Object around(Foo fooObject) : indirectCalls() && target(fooObject) {
System.out.println(thisJoinPointStaticPart + " -> caller = " + thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart);
//new Exception("printing stack trace").printStackTrace(System.out);
//System.out.println();
return proceed(fooObject);
}
}
控制台日志:
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod())
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
现在这看起来比以前好多了,我们将之前截获的 12 个调用的结果缩小到 6 个。但是为什么我们在结果列表中有像 Foo.zot 和 Bar.anotherMethod 这样的调用者,即使我们说我们想将控制流限制为Bar.bar?答案很简单:这两个方法也被Bar.bar 直接或间接调用,因此在控制流中。如果我们检查调用堆栈,我们会更清楚地看到这一点(只需取消注释代码中的两个日志语句):
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo_aroundBody1$advice(Foo.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot(Foo.java:11)
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.blah(Foo.java:5)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:19)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.foo_aroundBody3$advice(Bar.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:21)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo_aroundBody1$advice(Foo.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot(Foo.java:11)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo_aroundBody1$advice(Foo.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot(Foo.java:11)
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.blah(Foo.java:5)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod(Bar.java:27)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:23)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.foo_aroundBody5$advice(Bar.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod(Bar.java:28)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:23)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo_aroundBody1$advice(Foo.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Foo.zot(Foo.java:11)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod(Bar.java:29)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:23)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
如果您检查 6 个调用堆栈,您会在每个调用堆栈中找到 Bar.bar。所以cflow 切入点已经完成了我们告诉它的事情。
我们还能变得更好吗?如何告诉方面不仅将被调用者(目标)对象限制为Foo,还将调用者(this)对象限制为Bar?
方面,第 3 部分:拦截由Bar.bar 直接(内)发出的对Foo.foo 的调用,但绝对来自Bar 对象
package de.scrum_master.aspect;
import my.thirdparty.application.Foo;
import my.thirdparty.application.Bar;
public aspect MethodInterceptor {
pointcut callsFromBar(Bar barObject) :
call(* Foo.foo(..)) && cflow(execution(* Bar.bar(..))) && this(barObject);
Object around(Foo fooObject, Bar barObject) : callsFromBar(barObject) && target(fooObject) {
System.out.println(thisJoinPointStaticPart + " -> caller = " + thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart);
new Exception("printing stack trace").printStackTrace(System.out);
System.out.println();
return proceed(fooObject, barObject);
}
}
控制台日志:
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.foo_aroundBody3$advice(Bar.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:21)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.foo_aroundBody5$advice(Bar.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.anotherMethod(Bar.java:28)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:23)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
我们变得越来越好:从 6 次拦截减少到 2 次。来自Bar.anotherMethod 的拦截仍然不需要,因为它只是由 Bar.bar 间接触发,我们的目标是只拦截直接呼叫。好的,那么让我们更精确一点:
方面,第 4 部分:拦截由 Bar.bar 直接发出的对 Foo.foo 的调用,不允许间接调用
package de.scrum_master.aspect;
import my.thirdparty.application.Foo;
import my.thirdparty.application.Bar;
public aspect MethodInterceptor {
pointcut directCalls(Bar barObject) :
call(* Foo.foo(..)) && cflow(execution(* Bar.bar(..))) && this(barObject) &&
if("bar".equals(thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart.getSignature().getName()));
Object around(Foo fooObject, Bar barObject) : directCalls(barObject) && target(fooObject) {
System.out.println(thisJoinPointStaticPart + " -> caller = " + thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart);
new Exception("printing stack trace").printStackTrace(System.out);
System.out.println();
return proceed(fooObject, barObject);
}
}
控制台日志:
call(void my.thirdparty.application.Foo.foo()) -> caller = execution(void my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar())
java.lang.Exception: printing stack trace
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.foo_aroundBody3$advice(Bar.java:22)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.bar(Bar.java:21)
at my.thirdparty.application.Bar.doSomething(Bar.java:8)
at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)
等等!这是我们最初想要的。让我们回顾一下我们刚刚为缩小切入点所做的工作:
-
call(* Foo.foo(..)) - 只调用Foo.foo
-
cflow(execution(* Bar.bar(..))) - 仅在控制流中执行Bar.bar
-
this(barObject) - 调用者必须是 Bar 对象
-
target(fooObject) - 被调用者必须是 Foo 对象
-
if("bar".equals(thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart.getSignature().getName())) - 动态运行时条件检查直接调用者的方法名称是否真的是 bar
我希望这可以解决您的问题并且不会太冗长。我想做教程式的,以便让您了解如何解决像这样的高级 AOP 问题。享受吧!