为什么不直接在字符串上调用String#toCharArray?
如果您仍然使用nextLine,读者将截断换行符。
类似:
try(BufferedReader r = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("topSecretDocs.txt"))) {
for(String line = r.readLine(); line != null; line = r.readLine()) {
char[] chars = line.toCharArray();
System.out.println("Split line to " + Arrays.toString(chars));
}
} catch(IOException e) {
dealWithException();
}
编辑:请注意,您可能希望使用String#charAt 循环遍历字符串,因为不需要复制字符数组,尤其是对于非常大的字符串。
编辑 2:这是一个非常糟糕的基准。
static long time(Runnable r) {
long start = System.nanoTime();
r.run();
return System.nanoTime() - start;
}
static int cs = 0;
public static void main(String[] args) {
char[] bigString = new char[100000];
Arrays.fill(bigString, 0, bigString.length / 4, 'A');
Arrays.fill(bigString, bigString.length / 4, bigString.length / 2, 'B');
Arrays.fill(bigString, bigString.length / 2, bigString.length * 3 / 4, 'C');
Arrays.fill(bigString, bigString.length * 3 / 4, bigString.length, 'D');
String s = new String(bigString);
float avgCopy = 0, avgLoop = 0;
final int times = 100000;
for(int i = 0; i < times; i++) {
avgLoop += time(() -> {
cs = 0;
for(int j = 0; j < s.length(); j++)
cs += s.charAt(j) == 'C' ? 1 : 0;
});
} avgLoop /= times;
for(int i = 0; i < times; i++) {
avgCopy += time(() -> {
char[] chars = s.toCharArray();
cs = 0;
for(char c : chars)
cs += c == 'C' ? 1 : 0;
});
} avgCopy /= times;
System.out.println("copy: " + avgCopy + " ns");
System.out.println("loop: " + avgLoop + " ns");
System.out.println("There were (obviously) " + cs + " Cs in that string.");
}
我明白了:
copy: 70984.336 ns
loop: 40534.63 ns
所以,大约快了一半。您是否愿意称其为重大差异,我将由您决定。