【发布时间】:2016-04-27 11:36:02
【问题描述】:
我需要序列化一个结构,并且我正在尝试使用 memcpy 来执行此操作。但它不起作用。我可以通过查看字节流来判断——我看到了垃圾字符。为什么?
还有运行时错误:
运行时检查失败 #2 - 变量“地址”周围的堆栈已损坏。
发生了什么,我该如何解决?
我正在使用#pragma pack(push, 1),我认为这意味着结构不会有填充。
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#pragma pack(push, 1) /* padding has to be disabled for casting to struct to work at other end */
typedef struct {
uint8_t start_char;
uint8_t msg_type;
uint8_t length;
} MSG_HEADER;
typedef struct {
uint8_t denomination[6];
uint8_t path;
uint8_t min_level;
uint16_t max_level;
uint16_t weight;
uint8_t address;
} CONFIG_DATA;
typedef struct {
MSG_HEADER header;
uint8_t clear_type;
CONFIG_DATA config_data[12];
uint8_t system_algorithm;
uint8_t max_transaction;
} MSG_CONFIGURATION;
#pragma pack(pop) /* only affect this file */
typedef struct {
unsigned char data[256];
size_t length;
int msg_type;
} TCHU_MESSAGE;
enum DRM_MESSAGE_TYPE {
CONFIG, CLEAR_COUNT, DISPENSE, CANCEL_TRANSACTION };
void TestCopy()
{
MSG_CONFIGURATION config;
config.clear_type = 0;
config.system_algorithm = 0;
config.max_transaction = 17;
const int NumItems = 12;
const uint16_t maxLevel = 300;
static const char* denoms[] = { "GB005A","GB005B","GB010A","GB010B",
"GB020A","GB050A","GB050B","GB100A",
"GB100B","GB200A", "EU100A", "EU100B" };
const uint8_t addresses[] = { 0, 0, 5, 5, 0, 7, 7, 8, 8, 9, 0, 0 };
const uint8_t sorting_paths[] = { 5, 5, 4, 4, 5, 2, 2, 1, 1, 3, 0, 0 };
for(int i = 0; i < NumItems; ++i) {
memcpy(config.config_data[i].denomination, denoms[i], 6);
config.config_data[i].address = addresses[i];
config.config_data[i].path = sorting_paths[i];
config.config_data[i].min_level = 3;
config.config_data[i].max_level = maxLevel;
config.config_data[i].weight = 1000;
}
config.header.start_char = 1;
config.header.msg_type = 2;
config.header.length = sizeof(MSG_CONFIGURATION);
TCHU_MESSAGE tchu_msg = {0};
// why does the memcpy not work? How can I get it to work?
memcpy(tchu_msg.data, &config+sizeof(MSG_HEADER), sizeof(MSG_CONFIGURATION) - sizeof(MSG_HEADER));
printf("sizeof(MSG_HEADER) = %u\n", sizeof(MSG_HEADER));
printf("sizeof(MSG_CONFIGURATION) = %u\n", sizeof(MSG_CONFIGURATION));
// get garbage in copyconfig
MSG_CONFIGURATION copyconfig;
memcpy(©config+sizeof(MSG_HEADER), tchu_msg.data, sizeof(MSG_CONFIGURATION) - sizeof(MSG_HEADER));
if(copyconfig.header.start_char != config.header.start_char)
{
// we get to here
printf("mismatch between original and copy\n");
}
}
int main() {
TestCopy();
// I also get Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'addresses' was corrupted.
// when program ends
}
【问题讨论】:
-
欢迎来到 Stack Overflow!听起来您可能需要学习如何使用调试器来逐步执行代码。使用好的调试器,您可以逐行执行您的程序,并查看它与您期望的偏差在哪里。如果您要进行任何编程,这是必不可少的工具。进一步阅读:How to debug small programs.
-
偏移到这样的结构中是否明智?成员的顺序是否由 C 保证?为简单起见,您能否不从 MSG_CONFIGURATION 中删除 MSG_HEADER 并将它们单独发送,并避免偏移到这样的结构中。
-
你知道
&config+sizeof(MSG_HEADER)是做什么的吗?它将地址&config前进sizeof(MSG_HEADER)*sizeof(MSG_CONFIGURATION)字节。我不认为那是你想要的。 -
你不连载,而只是重新诠释。对 bitops&shifts 使用正确的序列化。并且 C 标准没有定义该 pragma(或大多数其他)的行为