【发布时间】:2019-10-19 14:17:45
【问题描述】:
我试图在每个 epoch 之后在整个训练集上评估我的模型。 这就是我所做的:
torch.manual_seed(1)
model = ConvNet(num_classes=num_classes)
cost_fn = nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
optimizer = torch.optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=learning_rate)
def compute_accuracy(model, data_loader):
correct_pred, num_examples = 0, 0
for features, targets in data_loader:
logits = model(features)
predicted_labels = torch.argmax(logits, 1)
num_examples += targets.size(0)
correct_pred += (predicted_labels == targets).sum()
return correct_pred.float()/num_examples * 100
for epoch in range(num_epochs):
model = model.train()
for features, targets in train_loader:
logits = model(features)
cost = cost_fn(logits, targets)
optimizer.zero_grad()
cost.backward()
optimizer.step()
model = model.eval()
print('Epoch: %03d/%03d training accuracy: %.2f%%' % (
epoch+1, num_epochs,
compute_accuracy(model, train_loader)))
输出令人信服:
Epoch: 001/005 training accuracy: 89.08%
Epoch: 002/005 training accuracy: 90.41%
Epoch: 003/005 training accuracy: 91.70%
Epoch: 004/005 training accuracy: 92.31%
Epoch: 005/005 training accuracy: 92.95%
然后我在训练循环的末尾添加了另一行,以便在每个 epoch 之后在整个测试集上评估模型:
for epoch in range(num_epochs):
model = model.train()
for features, targets in train_loader:
logits = model(features)
cost = cost_fn(logits, targets)
optimizer.zero_grad()
cost.backward()
optimizer.step()
model = model.eval()
print('Epoch: %03d/%03d training accuracy: %.2f%%' % (
epoch+1, num_epochs,
compute_accuracy(model, train_loader)))
print('\t\t testing accuracy: %.2f%%' % (compute_accuracy(model, test_loader)))
但训练精度开始发生变化:
Epoch: 001/005 training accuracy: 89.08%
testing accuracy: 87.66%
Epoch: 002/005 training accuracy: 90.42%
testing accuracy: 89.04%
Epoch: 003/005 training accuracy: 91.84%
testing accuracy: 90.01%
Epoch: 004/005 training accuracy: 91.86%
testing accuracy: 89.83%
Epoch: 005/005 training accuracy: 92.45%
testing accuracy: 90.32%
我做错了吗?我希望训练精度保持不变,因为手动种子在两种情况下都是 1。 这是预期的输出吗?
【问题讨论】:
-
如果 model.eval() 正在做与随机相关的事情,它会影响后面的所有随机数。将随机想象为在手动种子时确定的一些无限的随机位流。所有生成随机数的调用都使用相同的流。我认为在每次调用“train()”之前播种会给你想要的一致结果
-
我以为我在实现中做错了什么。但看起来它与随机数的行为有关。感谢您指出这一点。
标签: python validation pytorch random-seed