我可以通过对我的 proguard-rules.pro 文件执行三项操作来解决此问题:
首先,确保ProGuard 不会更改您使用Gson 序列化的任何自定义类的名称。假设您有一个名为Classname 的类。要免除它,请将其添加到您的 progaurd-rules.pro:
-keepclassmembernames class com.your.package.classname { <fields>; }
(将com.your.package.classname替换为您的实际包和类名)
我不得不上十几堂课。不要忘记免除那些也是自定义的类的任何成员变量。使用 classname$innerclass 而不是 classname 来免除内部类。
第二,添加Gson库推荐的规则。 They can be found here. 写这篇文章的时候是这样的:
##---------------Begin: proguard configuration for Gson ----------
# Gson uses generic type information stored in a class file when working with fields. Proguard
# removes such information by default, so configure it to keep all of it.
-keepattributes Signature
# For using GSON @Expose annotation
-keepattributes *Annotation*
# Gson specific classes
-dontwarn sun.misc.**
#-keep class com.google.gson.stream.** { *; }
# Application classes that will be serialized/deserialized over Gson
-keep class com.google.gson.examples.android.model.** { <fields>; }
# Prevent proguard from stripping interface information from TypeAdapter, TypeAdapterFactory,
# JsonSerializer, JsonDeserializer instances (so they can be used in @JsonAdapter)
-keep class * extends com.google.gson.TypeAdapter
-keep class * implements com.google.gson.TypeAdapterFactory
-keep class * implements com.google.gson.JsonSerializer
-keep class * implements com.google.gson.JsonDeserializer
# Prevent R8 from leaving Data object members always null
-keepclassmembers,allowobfuscation class * {
@com.google.gson.annotations.SerializedName <fields>;
}
# Retain generic signatures of TypeToken and its subclasses with R8 version 3.0 and higher.
-keep,allowobfuscation,allowshrinking class com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken
-keep,allowobfuscation,allowshrinking class * extends com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken
##---------------End: proguard configuration for Gson ----------
最后,添加以下两条规则:
-dontwarn java.lang.reflect.**
-keep class kotlin.** { *; }
这些解决了我遇到的嵌套 null 问题 - 当然,在我完成上述步骤之后。