【问题标题】:Clojure spec "conformer" function, what is it?Clojure 规范的“conformer”函数,它是什么?
【发布时间】:2019-09-10 13:18:00
【问题描述】:

clojure.spec.alpha API 有一个名为 conformer 的宏,其描述如下:

Usage: (conformer f)
       (conformer f unf)

takes a predicate function with the semantics of conform i.e. it should
return either a (possibly converted) value or :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid,
and returns a spec that uses it as a predicate/conformer. Optionally takes
a second fn that does unform of result of first

这对我来说不清楚,如果不是深奥的话。

它是做什么用的? “unformer”(不应该是“unformer”)是用来做什么的?我想从返回的“符合值”重新创建原始数据?

更新

经过 15 分钟的实验,似乎是从“谓词”创建一个新的“规范”(“规范”有什么特别之处??)

我试过了

(require '[clojure.spec.alpha :as s :refer [valid? explain conform conformer]])

; ---
; Using purely clojure.spec.alpha:
; ---

(s/def ::vtx-x float?)  
(s/def ::vtx-y float?)
(s/def ::vertex (s/keys :req [::vtx-x ::vtx-y]))

(type (s/get-spec ::vertex))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$map_spec_impl$reify__1997

(conform ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> #:user{:vtx-x 1.0, :vtx-y 2.0}

(valid? ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> true

(conform ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 })
;=> :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid

; ---
; Using my own special sauce predicate function, where the conformed
; value carries additional information ... maybe for a debugging system?
; ---

(defn my-vertex-conformer [v]
   (when-let [ { x ::vtx-x y ::vtx-y } v ]
      (if (and (float? x) (float? y)) 
         [:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something (+ x y) :orig v]
         ; else
         :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid)))

(defn my-vertex-unformer [conf-v] (get conf-v :orig))

(s/def ::my-vertex (conformer my-vertex-conformer my-vertex-unformer))

(type (s/get-spec ::my-vertex))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059

(conform ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> [:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something 3.0 
;=>         :orig #:user{:vtx-x 1.0, :vtx-y 2.0}]

(valid? ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> true

(conform ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 })
;=> :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid

奖金,令人惊讶的是这里也不例外,这是疏忽吗?

(conformer map?)
;=> #object[clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059 0x770b843 "clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059@770b843"]

(type (conformer map?))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059

【问题讨论】:

标签: clojure clojure.spec


【解决方案1】:

它是干什么用的?

用于创建一个规范,该规范(当用于符合一个值时)可以返回与给定值不同的值。

(s/conform str 1)
=> 1   ;; (str 1) returned truthy value; input value unchanged
(s/conform (s/conformer str) 1)
=> "1" ;; returns (str 1)

“unformer”(不应该是“unconformer”)是做什么用的?我想从返回的“符合值”重新创建原始数据?

确切地说,unformer 函数可用于逆转使用s/unform 的conformer 所做的任何更改。

(s/def ::str (s/conformer str #(Integer/parseInt %)))
(s/conform ::str 1)
=> "1"
(s/unform ::str "1")
=> 1

有机会简化您的示例规范:

(defn my-vertex-conformer [v]
  (let [{x ::vtx-x y ::vtx-y} v] ;; don't need validation here
    {:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something (+ x y) :orig v}))

(s/def ::my-vertex
  (s/and ::vertex ;; because the validation is done by (s/and ::vertex ...)
         (s/conformer my-vertex-conformer
                      :orig))) ;; keyword can be used as unform function

(->> {::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0}
     (s/conform ::my-vertex)
     (s/unform ::my-vertex))
=> {::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0}

奖金,令人惊讶的是这里也不例外,这是疏忽吗?

(conformer map?)

不,这里没有任何问题,尽管将 map? 之类的布尔谓词函数与 conformer 一起使用可能是不寻常的:

(s/conform (s/conformer map?) {})
=> true
(s/conform (s/conformer map?) [])
=> false

(s/conformer map?) 是一个规范,它可以接受任何值,如果它是一个映射则符合 true,否则为 false。

[spec] 最初来自哪里?

合同的概念已经以各种形式出现了一段时间,例如https://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/contracts.html。另见https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_by_contract

【讨论】:

    猜你喜欢
    • 2016-10-12
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 2016-11-25
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    相关资源
    最近更新 更多