【发布时间】:2011-09-26 18:46:25
【问题描述】:
我正在改进我拥有的脚本,以便最终用户可以自动化和维护它。
之前,我在this SO 帖子中提到了这个脚本的一部分。
正如Randy 在his 回答中所描述的那样,SQL 语句的逻辑应该替换为表和连接的组合以完成相同的最终结果。
基本情况和目标如下:
目前,脚本将根据涉及多个变量的一组复杂规则自动为学生分配顾问。
由于员工(聘用/解雇顾问)、专业(添加/删除计划)和学时限制(确定顾问所需的最短时间)的变化,终端场景的规则将随着时间而改变。
这些规则需要在脚本/SQL 之外维护,以便最终用户(院长/部门负责人)可以管理终端场景。
需要创建一个自定义表来有效地管理这些规则。
这是当前用于执行这些规则的 SQL:
SELECT DISTINCT s.id stu_id,
stu_id.fullname stu_name,
p.major1 major,
p.minor1 minor,
s.reg_hrs,
NVL(st.cum_earn_hrs,0) ttl_hrs,
p.adv_id curr_adv_id,
adv_id.fullname curr_adv_name,
CASE WHEN (p.adv_id <> 35808 AND p.major1 = 'NS') THEN (1165)
WHEN (p.adv_id = 35808 AND p.major1 = 'NS') THEN (35808)
WHEN (p.adv_id = 9179 AND p.major1 = 'DART') THEN (9179)
WHEN (p.minor1 IN ('RT','RESP') AND st.cum_earn_hrs >= 24) THEN (70897)
WHEN (p.major1 IN ('CDSC','CDSD')) THEN (52125)
WHEN (p.major1 IN ('CA','CB')) THEN (24702)
WHEN (p.minor1 = 'NURS') THEN (51569)
WHEN (p.major1 = 'LEG') THEN (13324)
WHEN (p.major1 = 'CC') THEN (73837)
WHEN (p.major1 = 'CCRE') THEN (1133)
WHEN ((p.adv_id IN (SELECT DISTINCT id FROM fac_rec WHERE stat = 'I'))
OR (st.cum_earn_hrs < 24 AND (p.adv_id||p.major1) IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE stat = 'A' AND max_stu > 0 AND min_hrs >= 24))
OR (s.id NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT stu.id FROM stu_acad_rec stu, sess_info si WHERE stu.yr = si.prev_yr AND stu.sess = si.prev_sess AND stu.reg_hrs > 0 AND stu.reg_stat IN ('C','R') AND stu.prog = 'UNDG'))
OR ((p.adv_id||p.major1) IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE stat <> 'A' OR max_stu <= 0))
OR ((p.adv_id||p.major1) NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE stat = 'A' AND max_stu > 0)))
THEN (9238)
ELSE (p.adv_id)
END new_adv_id,
CASE WHEN (p.adv_id <> 35808 AND p.major1 = 'NS') THEN ('Deborah')
WHEN (p.adv_id = 35808 AND p.major1 = 'NS') THEN ('Veronica')
WHEN (p.adv_id = 9179 AND p.major1 = 'DART') THEN ('Stella')
WHEN (p.minor1 IN ('RT','RESP') AND st.cum_earn_hrs >= 24) THEN ('Lisa')
WHEN (p.major1 IN ('CDSC','CDSD')) THEN ('Joanne')
WHEN (p.major1 IN ('CA','CB')) THEN ('Barbara')
WHEN (p.minor1 = 'NURS') THEN ('Karen')
WHEN (p.major1 = 'LEG') THEN ('Nancy')
WHEN (p.major1 = 'CC') THEN ('Alberta')
WHEN (p.major1 = 'CCRE') THEN ('Naomi')
WHEN ((p.adv_id IN (SELECT DISTINCT id FROM fac_rec WHERE stat = 'I'))
OR (st.cum_earn_hrs < 24 AND (p.adv_id||p.major1) IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE stat = 'A' AND max_stu > 0 AND min_hrs >= 24))
OR (s.id NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT stu.id FROM stu_acad_rec stu, sess_info si WHERE stu.yr = si.prev_yr AND stu.sess = si.prev_sess AND stu.reg_hrs > 0 AND stu.reg_stat IN ('C','R') AND stu.prog = 'UNDG'))
OR ((p.adv_id||p.major1) IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE stat <> 'A' OR max_stu <= 0))
OR ((p.adv_id||p.major1) NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE stat = 'A' AND max_stu > 0)))
THEN ('Staff')
ELSE (adv_id.fullname)
END new_adv_name,
CASE WHEN (p.adv_id <> 35808 AND p.major1 = 'NS') THEN ('NS majors not assigned to Veronica go to Debbie')
WHEN (p.adv_id = 35808 AND p.major1 = 'NS') THEN ('NS majors stay with Veronica')
WHEN (p.adv_id = 9179 AND p.major1 = 'DART') THEN ('DART majors stay with Stella')
WHEN (p.minor1 IN ('RT','RESP') AND st.cum_earn_hrs >= 24) THEN ('RT-RESP minors go to Lisa')
WHEN (p.major1 IN ('CDSC','CDSD')) THEN ('CDSC-CDSD majors go to Joanne')
WHEN (p.major1 IN ('CA','CB')) THEN ('CA-CB majors go to Barbara')
WHEN (p.minor1 = 'NURS') THEN ('NURS minors go to Karen')
WHEN (p.major1 = 'LEG') THEN ('LEG majors go to Nancy')
WHEN (p.major1 = 'CC') THEN ('CC majors go to Alberta')
WHEN (p.major1 = 'CCRE') THEN ('CCRE majors go to Naomi')
WHEN (p.adv_id IN (SELECT DISTINCT id FROM fac_rec WHERE stat = 'I'))
THEN ('Current advisor is inactive')
WHEN (st.cum_earn_hrs < 24 AND (p.adv_id||p.major1) IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE stat = 'A' AND max_stu > 0 AND min_hrs >= 24))
THEN ('Total credits for this student did not meet the advisor reqs for this major')
WHEN (s.id NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT stu.id FROM stu_acad_rec stu, sess_info si WHERE stu.yr = si.prev_yr AND stu.sess = si.prev_sess AND stu.reg_hrs > 0 AND stu.reg_stat IN ('C','R') AND stu.prog = 'UNDG'))
THEN ('This student did not attend '||si.prev_sess||si.prev_yr)
WHEN ((p.adv_id||p.major1) IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE (stat <> 'A' OR max_stu <= 0)))
THEN ('Current advisor is not advising students with this major')
WHEN ((p.adv_id||p.major1) NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT (id||major) FROM adv_detail WHERE stat = 'A' AND max_stu > 0))
THEN ('Current advisor is not advising students with this major')
ELSE ('Student will stay with current advisor')
END change_comm
FROM stu_acad_rec s,
prog_enr_rec p,
OUTER stu_stat_rec st,
id_rec stu_id,
id_rec adv_id,
sess_info si
WHERE s.id = p.id
AND s.id = st.id
AND s.id = stu_id.id
AND p.adv_id = adv_id.id
AND s.yr = si.curr_yr
AND s.sess = si.curr_sess
AND s.reg_hrs > 0
AND s.reg_stat IN ('C','R')
AND s.prog = 'UNDG'
AND p.prog = 'UNDG'
AND st.prog = 'UNDG'
AND s.id NOT IN (3,287,9238,59999) {System test use IDs}
INTO TEMP stu_list
WITH NO LOG;
我正在尝试构建一个表格来保存所有这些规则,但从未创建过具有这种用途的表格。
到目前为止,我的想法是一个具有这种结构的表:
adv_assign_rules
----------------
rule_no
curr_adv_id
major1
major2
minor1
minor2
cum_earn_hrs
new_adv_id
rule_desc
rule_no_ref
rule_stat
rule_date
此表的示例行将容纳 SQL 选择中的第一种情况,可能如下所示:
rule_no 1
curr_adv_id !35808
major1 =NS
major2
minor1
minor2
cum_earn_hrs
new_adv_id 1165
rule_desc NS majors not assigned to 35808 go to Debbie
rule_no_ref
rule_stat A
rule_date 2011-09-26 15:02:26.000
这样的桌子有什么缺陷吗?这种类型的设置可以适应所有这些规则吗?有谁知道在哪里可以找到用于类似目的的表格示例?
我正在寻找有关此问题的改进和/或替代解决方案的建议。这些案例陈述中的“其他”场景表明不需要更改学生的顾问。此外,其中包含最多逻辑的案例(“else”案例之前的最后一个案例)将新顾问默认为 9238 - 这表明已经存在的其他逻辑将用于分配新的 adivsor。之前的所有案例都是默认场景,它们是不遵循分配新顾问规则的特殊案例——这些是我试图以表格格式重新创建的特殊案例。
更新:我也在寻找重现和/或场景的功能。我添加了两个字段:rule_no & rule_no_ref,分别是一个序列号(自动递增)和对另一个规则序列号的引用。
在此先感谢您提供的任何帮助!
【问题讨论】:
-
我想你可能想为此保留
CASE。如果没有某种循环,将很难复制短路行为。一种可能性是使用动态 SQL 并使用每个场景的CASE条件填充您的表。 -
如果我是唯一打算维护它的人,我会保留它,但最终用户需要一种方法来调整这些规则。我会考虑你的其他建议 - 谢谢
标签: sql database-design case rules