【问题标题】:Using RoboGuice context injection with an AbstractThreadedSyncAdapter使用带有 AbstractThreadedSyncAdapter 的 RoboGuice 上下文注入
【发布时间】:2012-03-17 17:42:16
【问题描述】:

我正在使用 RoboGuice 2.0b4 连接我的 Android 应用程序,该应用程序使用托管在常规服务中的 SyncAdapter(派生自 AbstractThreadedSyncAdapter):

@ContextSingleton
public class SyncAdapter extends AbstractThreadedSyncAdapter {
    @Inject
    private AccountManager accountManager;

    @Inject
    public SyncAdapter(Context context) {
        super(context, true, false);

        Injector injector = RoboGuice.getInjector(context);
        ContextScope scope = injector.getInstance(ContextScope.class);
        synchronized(ContextScope.class) {
            scope.enter(context);
            try {
                injector.injectMembers(this);
            } finally {
                scope.exit(context);
            }
        }
    }
    [...]
}


@ContextSingleton
public class SynchronizationService extends RoboService {
    @Inject
    private SyncAdapter syncAdapter;

    @Override
    public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
        if (equal("android.content.SyncAdapter", intent.getAction())) {
            return syncAdapter.getSyncAdapterBinder();
        } else [...]
        }
        return null;
    }
}

不幸的是,在依赖注入期间,RoboGuice 在从 SyncAdapter 的构造函数调用 scope.enter 时变为递归时退出:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Scope for com.example.SynchronizationService@412c65b0 must be closed before scope for com.example.SynchronizationService@412c65b0 may be opened

当它看到通过SynchronizationServiceonCreate 调用附加到当前线程的上下文时。堆栈跟踪:

  at roboguice.inject.ContextScope.enter(ContextScope.java:67)
  at roboguice.inject.ContextScopedRoboInjector.getInstance(ContextScopedRoboInjector.java:141)
  at com.example.SyncAdapter.<init>(SyncAdapter.java:65)
  at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.constructNative(Constructor.java:-1)
  at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:417)
  at com.google.inject.internal.DefaultConstructionProxyFactory$1.newInstance(DefaultConstructionProxyFactory.java:85)
  at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorInjector.construct(ConstructorInjector.java:85)
  at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorBindingImpl$Factory.get(ConstructorBindingImpl.java:254)
  at com.google.inject.internal.ProviderToInternalFactoryAdapter$1.call(ProviderToInternalFactoryAdapter.java:46)
  at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.callInContext(InjectorImpl.java:1031)
  at com.google.inject.internal.ProviderToInternalFactoryAdapter.get(ProviderToInternalFactoryAdapter.java:40)
  at roboguice.inject.ContextScope$1.get(ContextScope.java:126)
  at com.google.inject.internal.InternalFactoryToProviderAdapter.get(InternalFactoryToProviderAdapter.java:40)
  at com.google.inject.internal.SingleFieldInjector.inject(SingleFieldInjector.java:53)
  at com.google.inject.internal.MembersInjectorImpl.injectMembers(MembersInjectorImpl.java:110)
  at com.google.inject.internal.MembersInjectorImpl$1.call(MembersInjectorImpl.java:75)
  at com.google.inject.internal.MembersInjectorImpl$1.call(MembersInjectorImpl.java:73)
  at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.callInContext(InjectorImpl.java:1024)
  at com.google.inject.internal.MembersInjectorImpl.injectAndNotify(MembersInjectorImpl.java:73)
  at com.google.inject.internal.MembersInjectorImpl.injectMembers(MembersInjectorImpl.java:60)
  at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.injectMembers(InjectorImpl.java:944)
  at roboguice.inject.ContextScopedRoboInjector.injectMembersWithoutViews(ContextScopedRoboInjector.java:243)
  at roboguice.inject.ContextScopedRoboInjector.injectMembers(ContextScopedRoboInjector.java:236)
  at roboguice.service.RoboService.onCreate(RoboService.java:57)
  at android.app.ActivityThread.handleCreateService(ActivityThread.java:2253)
  [...]
  at dalvik.system.NativeStart.main(NativeStart.java:-1)

所以,显然,RoboGuice 的依赖注入是不可重入的。

不幸的是,SyncAdapter 需要基于构造函数的注入,因为 AbstractThreadedSyncAdapter 期望为其构造函数提供上下文。

有什么想法吗?我可能会破解 RoboGuice 以允许重入,但这可能不是一项轻松的任务,所以我更喜欢侵入性较小的解决方法。 ;-)

【问题讨论】:

    标签: java android inversion-of-control guice roboguice


    【解决方案1】:

    看起来这实际上是 RoboGuice 中的一个错误。幸运的是,在其问题跟踪器中提交的错误甚至附带了一个补丁:http://code.google.com/p/roboguice/issues/detail?id=179

    【讨论】:

      猜你喜欢
      • 1970-01-01
      • 1970-01-01
      • 1970-01-01
      • 2011-09-08
      • 1970-01-01
      • 1970-01-01
      • 1970-01-01
      • 1970-01-01
      相关资源
      最近更新 更多