【发布时间】:2016-05-24 08:27:07
【问题描述】:
我正在使用 Cython 重写我的一些 Python 代码。
按照in the documentation 的建议,我开始用优化的 cython 定义替换我的 python 数组。
特别是,以下应该是声明 numpy 数组的“最佳”方式:
# cython: profile=True
# cython: boundscheck=False
# cython: wraparound=False
import numpy as np
cimport numpy as np
cpdef test():
cdef np.ndarray[np.int_t, ndim=1] seeds_idx = np.empty(10, dtype=np.int)
pass
但是,通过cython -a my_file.pyx 分析上述代码生成的 html 文件显示如下:
+10: cdef np.ndarray[np.int_t, ndim=1] seeds_idx = np.empty(10, dtype=np.int)
__pyx_t_1 = __Pyx_GetModuleGlobalName(__pyx_n_s_np); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_1)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_1);
__pyx_t_2 = __Pyx_PyObject_GetAttrStr(__pyx_t_1, __pyx_n_s_empty); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_2)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_2);
__Pyx_DECREF(__pyx_t_1); __pyx_t_1 = 0;
__pyx_t_1 = PyDict_New(); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_1)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_1);
__pyx_t_3 = __Pyx_GetModuleGlobalName(__pyx_n_s_np); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_3)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_3);
__pyx_t_4 = __Pyx_PyObject_GetAttrStr(__pyx_t_3, __pyx_n_s_int); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_4)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_4);
__Pyx_DECREF(__pyx_t_3); __pyx_t_3 = 0;
if (PyDict_SetItem(__pyx_t_1, __pyx_n_s_dtype, __pyx_t_4) < 0) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_DECREF(__pyx_t_4); __pyx_t_4 = 0;
__pyx_t_4 = __Pyx_PyObject_Call(__pyx_t_2, __pyx_tuple_, __pyx_t_1); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_4)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_4);
__Pyx_DECREF(__pyx_t_2); __pyx_t_2 = 0;
__Pyx_DECREF(__pyx_t_1); __pyx_t_1 = 0;
if (!(likely(((__pyx_t_4) == Py_None) || likely(__Pyx_TypeTest(__pyx_t_4, __pyx_ptype_5numpy_ndarray))))) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__pyx_t_5 = ((PyArrayObject *)__pyx_t_4);
{
__Pyx_BufFmt_StackElem __pyx_stack[1];
if (unlikely(__Pyx_GetBufferAndValidate(&__pyx_pybuffernd_seeds_idx.rcbuffer->pybuffer, (PyObject*)__pyx_t_5, &__Pyx_TypeInfo_nn___pyx_t_5numpy_int_t, PyBUF_FORMAT| PyBUF_STRIDES, 1, 0, __pyx_stack) == -1)) {
__pyx_v_seeds_idx = ((PyArrayObject *)Py_None); __Pyx_INCREF(Py_None); __pyx_pybuffernd_seeds_idx.rcbuffer->pybuffer.buf = NULL;
__PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
} else {__pyx_pybuffernd_seeds_idx.diminfo[0].strides = __pyx_pybuffernd_seeds_idx.rcbuffer->pybuffer.strides[0]; __pyx_pybuffernd_seeds_idx.diminfo[0].shape = __pyx_pybuffernd_seeds_idx.rcbuffer->pybuffer.shape[0];
}
}
__pyx_t_5 = 0;
__pyx_v_seeds_idx = ((PyArrayObject *)__pyx_t_4);
__pyx_t_4 = 0;
/* … */
__pyx_tuple_ = PyTuple_Pack(1, __pyx_int_10); if (unlikely(!__pyx_tuple_)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_tuple_);
__Pyx_GIVEREF(__pyx_tuple_);
这是在 Python 2.7 上使用 cython 0.24 和 numpy 1.10.4 获得的。
另一方面,非常简单的声明 seeds_idx = np.empty(10) 导致:
+10: seeds_idx = np.empty(10)
__pyx_t_1 = __Pyx_GetModuleGlobalName(__pyx_n_s_np); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_1)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_1);
__pyx_t_2 = __Pyx_PyObject_GetAttrStr(__pyx_t_1, __pyx_n_s_empty); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_2)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_2);
__Pyx_DECREF(__pyx_t_1); __pyx_t_1 = 0;
__pyx_t_1 = __Pyx_PyObject_Call(__pyx_t_2, __pyx_tuple_, NULL); if (unlikely(!__pyx_t_1)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_t_1);
__Pyx_DECREF(__pyx_t_2); __pyx_t_2 = 0;
__pyx_v_seeds_idx = __pyx_t_1;
__pyx_t_1 = 0;
/* … */
__pyx_tuple_ = PyTuple_Pack(1, __pyx_int_10); if (unlikely(!__pyx_tuple_)) __PYX_ERR(0, 10, __pyx_L1_error)
__Pyx_GOTREF(__pyx_tuple_);
__Pyx_GIVEREF(__pyx_tuple_);
这里出了什么问题(如果有的话)?谢谢!
【问题讨论】:
-
没有错,numpy 数组是复杂(但非常高效)的数据结构。无论如何,您都可以尝试使用typed memoryviews,它们通常更快,并且可以轻松转换为 numpy 数组。
-
另一点值得一提的是,在分配数组时存在 开销。使用 quick 数组但分配它可能会慢一些,所以尽量不要不必要地这样做。
-
我明白了,所以声明期间的开销很小,但分配/访问/等要快得多。