【发布时间】:2012-10-26 17:25:55
【问题描述】:
我试图了解如何在 Haskell 中通过各种数据类型的参数来记忆函数。我已经实现了在 Ralf Hinze 的文章“Memo functions, polytypically!”中找到的 Tree 类型的制表和应用函数
我的实现如下。我的测试函数计算深度为 d 的树中子树的数量。如果我记住递归调用,这个函数应该更快吗?不是:对我的系统上的两个版本进行计时:
helmholtz:LearningHaskell edechter$ time ./Memo 1 23
Not memoized: # of subtrees for tree of depth 23 is: 25165822
real 0m1.898s
user 0m1.886s
sys 0m0.011s
helmholtz:LearningHaskell edechter$ time ./Memo 0 23
Memoized: # of subtrees for tree of depth 23 is: 25165822
real 0m5.129s
user 0m5.013s
sys 0m0.115s
我的代码很简单:
-- Memo.hs
import System.Environment
data Tree = Leaf | Fork Tree Tree deriving Show
data TTree v = NTree v (TTree (TTree v)) deriving Show
applyTree :: TTree v -> (Tree -> v)
applyTree (NTree tl tf) Leaf = tl
applyTree (NTree tl tf) (Fork l r) = applyTree (applyTree tf l) r
tabulateTree :: (Tree -> v) -> TTree v
tabulateTree f = NTree (f Leaf) (tabulateTree $ \l
-> tabulateTree $ \r -> f (Fork l r))
numSubTrees :: Tree -> Int
numSubTrees Leaf = 1
numSubTrees (Fork l r ) = 2 + numSubTrees l + numSubTrees r
memo = applyTree . tabulateTree
mkTree d | d == 0 = Leaf
| otherwise = Fork (mkTree $ d-1) (mkTree $ d-1)
main = do
args <- getArgs
let version = read $ head args
d = read $ args !! 1
(version_name, out) = if version == 0
then ("Memoized", (memo numSubTrees) (mkTree d))
else ("Not memoized", numSubTrees (mkTree d))
putStrLn $ version_name ++ ": # of subtrees for tree of depth "
++ show d ++ " is: " ++ show out
更新
我明白为什么我的函数不会利用记忆,但我仍然不明白如何构建一个可以利用这一点的函数。基于斐波那契记忆示例here,我的尝试如下:
memofunc :: Tree -> Int
memofunc = memo f
where f (Fork l r) = memofunc l + memofunc r
f (Leaf) = 1
func :: Tree -> Int
func (Leaf) = 1
func (Fork l r) = func l + func r
但这仍然没有做正确的事情:
helmholtz:LearningHaskell edechter$ time ./Memo 0 23
Memoized: # of subtrees for tree of depth 23 is: 8388608
real 0m10.436s
user 0m9.895s
sys 0m0.532s
helmholtz:LearningHaskell edechter$ time ./Memo 1 23
Not memoized: # of subtrees for tree of depth 23 is: 8388608
real 0m1.666s
user 0m1.654s
sys 0m0.011s
【问题讨论】:
-
numSubTrees只通过树一次,所以你不能指望记忆化在那里有什么不同。您是否期望它能够注意到mkTree生成的树具有相等的左右子树? (它不能)。 -
好的,但是为什么记忆的版本不能注意到它们有相等的左右子树呢?在计算完左子树后,它不会在表中查找右子树而不是重新计算它吗?
标签: haskell tree memoization