【发布时间】:2018-05-22 17:15:58
【问题描述】:
背景
我正在写一个可移动的QScopedPointer;基本上std::unique_pointer 带有一些额外的访问器。我在获得与 C++11 兼容的编译器之前就开始了它,但现在我决心把它做好(即使我正在重新发明轮子)。
问题
让我们调用我的智能指针MyUniquePointer。
我需要知道U *类型是否可以通过static_cast转换成T *类型,具体来说:
template<class T, class Cleanup>
class MyUniquePointer
{
...
template<class U, class CleanupU, class = std::enable_if_t<detail::is_safely_castable<U, T>()>
MyUniquePointer(MyUniquePointer<U, CleanupU> && other) noexcept
: d(static_cast<T *>(other.release()))
{}
...
问题的前半部分
我的第一次尝试是在enable_if 内使用static_cast,但您不能使用std::declval() 的地址来获取static_cast 的指针!
有没有办法使用模板魔术测试指向U 的指针是否可以static_cast 指向指向T 的指针?
尝试的解决方法
基于cppreference 和this answer,我尝试创建一个模板测试来模拟static_cast 何时合法,以及如果向下转换,则安全。到目前为止,这是我汇总的内容:
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template <class From, class To>
struct is_safely_castable //should probably be is_safely_castable_pointer or something
: std::integral_constant<bool,
std::is_pointer<From>() && std::is_pointer<To>()
&& ((std::is_base_of<To, From>()/* && std::has_virtual_destructor<From>()*/)
|| std::is_convertible<From, To>()
|| std::is_same<To,void *>()
|| std::is_same<From, void *>())>
{
};
struct base_type
{
base_type() = default;
base_type(base_type &&) = default;
base_type(const base_type &) = default;
virtual ~base_type() { }
base_type &operator=(const base_type &) = default;
base_type &operator=(base_type &&) = default;
};
struct derived_type : public base_type
{
};
struct unrelated_type
{
};
struct convertible_type
{
convertible_type(const base_type *) {}
convertible_type(base_type *) {}
convertible_type() = default;
operator base_type *() { return nullptr; }
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
(void)(argc);
(void)(argv);
base_type *b = new base_type;
derived_type *d = new derived_type;
unrelated_type *u = new unrelated_type;
uint32_t *i32 = new uint32_t{1};
uint64_t *i64 = new uint64_t{2};
void *v = static_cast<derived_type *>(d);
std::cout << std::boolalpha
<< "Base to base: " << (bool)static_cast<base_type *>(b) << '\n'
<< "Base to derived: " << (bool)static_cast<derived_type *>(b) << '\n'
<< "Derived to base: " << (bool)static_cast<base_type *>(d) << '\n'
<< "Unrelated to base: false\n" //<< static_cast<base_type *>(u) << '\n'
<< "uint32 to uint64: false\n" //<< static_cast<uint64_t *>(i32) << '\n'
<< "uint64 to uint32: false\n" //<< static_cast<uint32_t *>(i64) << '\n'
<< "Base to void: " << (bool)static_cast<void *>(b) << '\n'
<< "Void to derived: " << (bool)static_cast<derived_type *>(v) << '\n'
<< "Convertible to base: false\n" //<< static_cast<base_type *>(c) << '\n'
<< "Base to convertible: false\n";//<< static_cast<convertible_type *>(b) << '\n';
std::cout << "-----------\n"
<< "Base to base: " << is_safely_castable<base_type *, base_type *>() << '\n'
<< "Base to derived: " << is_safely_castable<base_type *, derived_type *>() << '\n'
<< "Derived to base: " << is_safely_castable<derived_type *, base_type *>() << '\n'
<< "Unrelated to base: " << is_safely_castable<unrelated_type *, base_type *>() << '\n'
<< "uint32 to uint64: " << is_safely_castable<uint32_t *, uint64_t *>() << '\n'
<< "uint64 to uint32: " << is_safely_castable<uint64_t *, uint32_t *>() << '\n'
<< "Base to void: " << is_safely_castable<base_type *, void *>() << '\n'
<< "Void to derived: " << is_safely_castable<void *, derived_type *>() << '\n'
<< "Convertible to base: " << is_safely_castable<convertible_type *, base_type *>() << '\n'
<< "Base to convertible: " << is_safely_castable<base_type *, convertible_type *>() << '\n';
delete b;
delete d;
delete u;
delete i32;
delete i64;
return 0;
}
返回:
Base to base: true
Base to derived: true
Derived to base: true
Unrelated to base: false
uint32 to uint64: false
uint64 to uint32: false
Base to void: true
Void to derived: true
Convertible to base: false
Base to convertible: false
-----------
Base to base: true
Base to derived: false
Derived to base: true
Unrelated to base: false
uint32 to uint64: false
uint64 to uint32: false
Base to void: true
Void to derived: true
Convertible to base: false
Base to convertible: false
我的问题的后半部分是这个解决方法是否在正确的轨道上,更具体地说,如果|| std::is_convertible<From, To>() 应该是
包括。是否可以让is_convertible 在通过时返回 true
指向类型的指针作为模板参数?上面的代码包括我自己尝试让它工作的笨拙的尝试。
脚注:我知道base_type * 成功转换为derived_type *,但我不是编译器,无法做出这样的假设。
【问题讨论】:
-
"你不能取std::declval()的地址"。
&std::declval<T&>()或只是std::declval<T*>()? -
&std::declval<T>() -
那行不通,但建议的变体应该可以完成这项工作。
-
现在看,我不明白
std::declval<T*>()会让你假装构造一个指向假装对象的指针。我想你只会得到一个T类型的假指针,它指向任何东西。
标签: c++ c++14 sfinae static-cast