您可以仅使用 Logstash aggregate filter 来实现这一点,但是,您必须大幅重新实现 elapsed filter 已经完成的功能,所以这很遗憾,对吧?
然后让我们混合使用 Logstash aggregate filter 和 elapsed filter。后者用于测量每个阶段的时间,前者用于将所有时间信息聚合到最后一个事件中。
旁注:您可能需要重新考虑您的时间戳格式,使其更符合解析标准。我已将它们转换为 ISO 8601 以使其更易于解析,但您可以随意推出自己的正则表达式。
所以我从以下日志开始:
2016-05-19T02:55:29.003 00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775 system1Enter
2016-05-19T02:55:29.200 00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775 system1Exit
2016-05-19T02:55:29.205 00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775 system2Enter
2016-05-19T02:55:29.453 00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775 system2Exit
首先我使用三个elapsed 过滤器(每个阶段一个in1、1->2 和in2),然后使用三个聚合过滤器来收集所有时间信息。它看起来像这样:
filter {
grok {
match => ["message", "%{TIMESTAMP_ISO8601:timestamp} %{UUID:messageId} %{WORD:event}"]
add_tag => [ "%{event}" ]
}
date {
match => [ "timestamp", "ISO8601"]
}
# Measures the execution time of system1
elapsed {
unique_id_field => "messageId"
start_tag => "system1Enter"
end_tag => "system1Exit"
new_event_on_match => true
add_tag => ["in1"]
}
# Measures the execution time of system2
elapsed {
unique_id_field => "messageId"
start_tag => "system2Enter"
end_tag => "system2Exit"
new_event_on_match => true
add_tag => ["in2"]
}
# Measures the time between system1 and system2
elapsed {
unique_id_field => "messageId"
start_tag => "system1Exit"
end_tag => "system2Enter"
new_event_on_match => true
add_tag => ["1->2"]
}
# Records the execution time of system1
if "in1" in [tags] and "elapsed" in [tags] {
aggregate {
task_id => "%{messageId}"
code => "map['report'] = [(event['elapsed_time']*1000).to_i]"
map_action => "create"
}
}
# Records the time between system1 and system2
if "1->2" in [tags] and "elapsed" in [tags] {
aggregate {
task_id => "%{messageId}"
code => "map['report'] << (event['elapsed_time']*1000).to_i"
map_action => "update"
}
}
# Records the execution time of system2
if "in2" in [tags] and "elapsed" in [tags] {
aggregate {
task_id => "%{messageId}"
code => "map['report'] << (event['elapsed_time']*1000).to_i; event['report'] = map['report'].join(':')"
map_action => "update"
end_of_task => true
}
}
}
在前两个事件之后,你会得到一个像这样的新事件,表明system1已经花费了197ms:
{
"@timestamp" => "2016-05-21T04:20:51.731Z",
"tags" => [ "elapsed", "elapsed_match", "in1" ],
"elapsed_time" => 0.197,
"messageId" => "00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775",
"elapsed_timestamp_start" => "2016-05-19T00:55:29.003Z"
}
在第三个事件之后,你会得到这样一个事件,显示system1和system2之间花费了多少时间,即5ms:
{
"@timestamp" => "2016-05-21T04:20:51.734Z",
"tags" => [ "elapsed", "elapsed_match", "1->2" ],
"elapsed_time" => 0.005,
"messageId" => "00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775",
"elapsed_timestamp_start" => "2016-05-19T00:55:29.200Z"
}
在第四个事件之后,你会得到一个像这样的新事件,它显示了在 system2 中花费了多少时间,即 248 毫秒。该事件还包含一个 report 字段,其中包含消息的所有时间信息
{
"@timestamp" => "2016-05-21T04:20:51.736Z",
"tags" => [ "elapsed", "elapsed_match", "in2" ],
"elapsed_time" => 0.248,
"messageId" => "00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775",
"elapsed_timestamp_start" => "2016-05-19T00:55:29.205Z"
"report" => "197:5:248"
}