【问题标题】:Verify method calls using with different state of object using Moq使用 Moq 验证使用不同对象状态的方法调用
【发布时间】:2016-09-08 20:30:42
【问题描述】:

最近我在我的一个 C# 项目中发现了 Moq 库 (4.5.21) 的非常有趣的行为。下面是我要测试的类。

public class Order
{
    public string State { get; set; }
}

public interface IOrderService
{
    Task UpdateOrderAsync(Order order);
}

public class Program
{
    public async Task RunAsync(IOrderService orderService)
    {
        var order = new Order();

        order.State = "new";
        await orderService.UpdateOrderAsync(order);

        order.State = "open";
        await orderService.UpdateOrderAsync(order);
    }
}

下面是我的TestClass:

[TestMethod]
public async Task TestMethod()
{
    var mock = new Mock<IOrderService>();
    await new Program().RunAsync(mock.Object);

    mock.Verify(x => x.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "new")), Times.Once);
    mock.Verify(x => x.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "open")), Times.Once);
}

我得到以下输出:

Moq.MockException:
Expected invocation on the mock once, but was 0 times: x => x.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "new"))


Configured setups:
x => x.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "new")), Times.Once
x => x.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "open")), Times.Once

Performed invocations:
IOrderService.UpdateOrderAsync(Order<State:open>)
IOrderService.UpdateOrderAsync(Order<State:open>)

我希望我可以 Verify 每次都使用 object 和不同的 State 调用该方法 Once。关于我做错了什么有什么想法吗?

谢谢!

【问题讨论】:

    标签: c# testing methods mocking moq


    【解决方案1】:

    设置模拟以使用回调。在回调里面统计方法被调用的次数

    mock.Setup(a => a.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "new")))
        .Returns(Task.Factory.StartNew(() => { }))
        .Callback(() => countOrderStateNew++);
    

    这里是完整的测试方法

    [TestMethod]
    public async Task TestMethod1()
    {
    
      var mock = new Mock<IOrderService>();
    
      Order o1 = new Order() { State = "new" };
    
      int countOrderStateNew = 0;
      int countOrderStateOpen = 0;
    
      mock.Setup(a => a.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "new")))
          .Returns(Task.Factory.StartNew(() => { }))
          .Callback(() => countOrderStateNew++);
      mock.Setup(a => a.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "open")))
          .Returns(Task.Factory.StartNew(() => { }))
          .Callback(()=> countOrderStateOpen++);
    
      await new Program().RunAsync(mock.Object);
    
      Assert.AreEqual(1, countOrderStateNew);
      Assert.AreEqual(1, countOrderStateOpen);
    
    
    }
    

    【讨论】:

      【解决方案2】:

      这看起来很像this post

      基本上这是因为在调用第一个 verify 时,mock 持有的引用(针对特定调用)已将其 State 属性更改为“open”(就在第二次调用之前)。这可以通过将 Order 类更改为结构来证明,以确保模拟捕获对象的副本而不是对对象本身的引用。

      编辑: 为了得到一个完整的答案,上面的帖子使用了现在已经过时的 Expect,这是一个通过测试:

      var mock = new Mock<IOrderService>(MockBehavior.Loose);
      
      var newCalled = false;
      var openCalledBeforeNew = false;
      
      mock.Setup(x => x.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "new"))).Callback(() => newCalled = !openCalledBeforeNew).Returns(Task.FromResult((object)null));
      mock.Setup(x => x.UpdateOrderAsync(It.Is<Order>(o => o.State == "open"))).Callback(() => openCalledBeforeNew = newCalled).Returns(Task.FromResult((object)null));
      
      await new Program().RunAsync(mock.Object);
      
      Assert.IsTrue(newCalled);
      Assert.IsTrue(openCalledBeforeNew);
      

      【讨论】:

        猜你喜欢
        • 2012-02-26
        • 1970-01-01
        • 2013-01-01
        • 1970-01-01
        • 2010-09-28
        • 2012-11-09
        • 1970-01-01
        • 2011-10-02
        • 2016-06-12
        相关资源
        最近更新 更多