【发布时间】:2020-02-04 13:37:17
【问题描述】:
试图让物体检测器工作以检测一些水果。
最初尝试使用ssd_mobilenet_v2_coco_2018_03_29。我跑了大约 50k 步,损失始终显示在 2 Total loss graph 左右
但是 1 类的 mAP 为 0.48,另一类为 0.16 mAP results
我总共有 1936 张图像用于训练,350 张图像用于测试,所以我不确定我哪里出错了,因为数据集并不小。
所有图片均来自images(https://github.com/openimages/dataset)
SSD 配置:
# SSD with Mobilenet v2 configuration for MSCOCO Dataset.
# Users should configure the fine_tune_checkpoint field in the train config as
# well as the label_map_path and input_path fields in the train_input_reader and
# eval_input_reader. Search for "PATH_TO_BE_CONFIGURED" to find the fields that
# should be configured.
model {
ssd {
num_classes: 2
box_coder {
faster_rcnn_box_coder {
y_scale: 10.0
x_scale: 10.0
height_scale: 5.0
width_scale: 5.0
}
}
matcher {
argmax_matcher {
matched_threshold: 0.5
unmatched_threshold: 0.5
ignore_thresholds: false
negatives_lower_than_unmatched: true
force_match_for_each_row: true
}
}
similarity_calculator {
iou_similarity {
}
}
anchor_generator {
ssd_anchor_generator {
num_layers: 6
min_scale: 0.2
max_scale: 0.95
aspect_ratios: 1.0
aspect_ratios: 2.0
aspect_ratios: 0.5
aspect_ratios: 3.0
aspect_ratios: 0.3333
}
}
image_resizer {
fixed_shape_resizer {
height: 300
width: 300
}
}
box_predictor {
convolutional_box_predictor {
min_depth: 0
max_depth: 0
num_layers_before_predictor: 0
use_dropout: false
dropout_keep_probability: 0.8
kernel_size: 1
box_code_size: 4
apply_sigmoid_to_scores: false
conv_hyperparams {
activation: RELU_6,
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.00004
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.03
mean: 0.0
}
}
batch_norm {
train: true,
scale: true,
center: true,
decay: 0.9997,
epsilon: 0.001,
}
}
}
}
feature_extractor {
type: 'ssd_mobilenet_v2'
min_depth: 16
depth_multiplier: 1.0
conv_hyperparams {
activation: RELU_6,
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.00004
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.03
mean: 0.0
}
}
batch_norm {
train: true,
scale: true,
center: true,
decay: 0.9997,
epsilon: 0.001,
}
}
}
loss {
classification_loss {
weighted_sigmoid {
}
}
localization_loss {
weighted_smooth_l1 {
}
}
hard_example_miner {
num_hard_examples: 3000
iou_threshold: 0.99
loss_type: CLASSIFICATION
max_negatives_per_positive: 3
min_negatives_per_image: 3
}
classification_weight: 1.0
localization_weight: 1.0
}
normalize_loss_by_num_matches: true
post_processing {
batch_non_max_suppression {
score_threshold: 1e-8
iou_threshold: 0.6
max_detections_per_class: 100
max_total_detections: 100
}
score_converter: SIGMOID
}
}
}
train_config: {
batch_size: 24
optimizer {
rms_prop_optimizer: {
learning_rate: {
exponential_decay_learning_rate {
initial_learning_rate: 0.004
decay_steps: 800720
decay_factor: 0.95
}
}
momentum_optimizer_value: 0.9
decay: 0.9
epsilon: 1.0
}
}
fine_tune_checkpoint: "E:/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/ssd_mobilenet_v2_coco_2018_03_29/model.ckpt"
fine_tune_checkpoint_type: "detection"
# Note: The below line limits the training process to 200K steps, which we
# empirically found to be sufficient enough to train the pets dataset. This
# effectively bypasses the learning rate schedule (the learning rate will
# never decay). Remove the below line to train indefinitely.
num_steps: 200000
data_augmentation_options {
random_horizontal_flip {
}
}
data_augmentation_options {
ssd_random_crop {
}
}
}
train_input_reader: {
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "E:/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/train.record"
}
label_map_path: "E:/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/training/labelmap.pbtxt"
}
eval_config: {
num_examples: 67
# Note: The below line limits the evaluation process to 10 evaluations.
# Remove the below line to evaluate indefinitely.
max_evals: 10
}
eval_input_reader: {
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "E:/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/test.record"
}
label_map_path: "E:/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/training/labelmap.pbtxt"
shuffle: false
num_readers: 1
}
然后我尝试使用 Faster R-CNN 进行类似的测试,因为我认为使用 faster_rcnn_inception_v2_coco_2018_01_28 时精度更高会更好
这次我有 3 节课。包含 2731 张用于训练的图像和 446 张用于测试的图像。
更快的 R-CNN 配置:
# Faster R-CNN with Inception v2, configured for Oxford-IIIT Pets Dataset.
# Users should configure the fine_tune_checkpoint field in the train config as
# well as the label_map_path and input_path fields in the train_input_reader and
# eval_input_reader. Search for "PATH_TO_BE_CONFIGURED" to find the fields that
# should be configured.
model {
faster_rcnn {
num_classes: 3
image_resizer {
keep_aspect_ratio_resizer {
min_dimension: 600
max_dimension: 1024
}
}
feature_extractor {
type: 'faster_rcnn_inception_v2'
first_stage_features_stride: 16
}
first_stage_anchor_generator {
grid_anchor_generator {
scales: [0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0]
aspect_ratios: [0.5, 1.0, 2.0]
height_stride: 16
width_stride: 16
}
}
first_stage_box_predictor_conv_hyperparams {
op: CONV
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.01
}
}
}
first_stage_nms_score_threshold: 0.0
first_stage_nms_iou_threshold: 0.7
first_stage_max_proposals: 300
first_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
first_stage_objectness_loss_weight: 1.0
initial_crop_size: 14
maxpool_kernel_size: 2
maxpool_stride: 2
second_stage_box_predictor {
mask_rcnn_box_predictor {
use_dropout: false
dropout_keep_probability: 1.0
fc_hyperparams {
op: FC
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
variance_scaling_initializer {
factor: 1.0
uniform: true
mode: FAN_AVG
}
}
}
}
}
second_stage_post_processing {
batch_non_max_suppression {
score_threshold: 0.0
iou_threshold: 0.6
max_detections_per_class: 100
max_total_detections: 300
}
score_converter: SOFTMAX
}
second_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
second_stage_classification_loss_weight: 1.0
}
}
train_config: {
batch_size: 1
optimizer {
momentum_optimizer: {
learning_rate: {
manual_step_learning_rate {
initial_learning_rate: 0.0002
schedule {
step: 900000
learning_rate: .00002
}
schedule {
step: 1200000
learning_rate: .000002
}
}
}
momentum_optimizer_value: 0.9
}
use_moving_average: false
}
gradient_clipping_by_norm: 10.0
fine_tune_checkpoint: "/homes/nj303/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/faster_rcnn_inception_v2_coco_2018_01_28/model.ckpt"
from_detection_checkpoint: true
load_all_detection_checkpoint_vars: true
# Note: The below line limits the training process to 200K steps, which we
# empirically found to be sufficient enough to train the pets dataset. This
# effectively bypasses the learning rate schedule (the learning rate will
# never decay). Remove the below line to train indefinitely.
num_steps: 200000
data_augmentation_options {
random_horizontal_flip {
}
}
}
train_input_reader: {
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "/homes/nj303/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/train.record"
}
label_map_path: "/homes/nj303/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/training/labelmap.pbtxt"
}
eval_config: {
metrics_set: "coco_detection_metrics"
num_examples: 67
}
eval_input_reader: {
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "/homes/nj303/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/test.record"
}
label_map_path: "/homes/nj303/objectdetect/model/research/object_detection/training/labelmap.pbtxt"
shuffle: false
num_readers: 1
}
但是,在 mAP 方面,我仍然收到很差的结果。 我跑了 100k 步,损失范围低于 0.1,但 mAP 为 0.38!我不确定如何改善这一点? mAP results for Faster R-CNN
我是新来的,所以任何帮助都将不胜感激!我不确定我做错了什么!
【问题讨论】:
-
您在创建 tf 记录时是否尝试过洗牌。可能会尝试训练更多像 200K 步的模型,请检查数据是否过拟合。
标签: python tensorflow machine-learning object-detection object-detection-api