【发布时间】:2016-11-05 16:38:44
【问题描述】:
我有一个 Java/Groovy 多线程进程,我想在 N 次执行后“同步”它: - 共享计数器在每个线程执行后递减 - 目标是在计数器达到 0 且没有其他线程访问它时重置计数器。
我尝试使用ReadWriteReentrantLock,但看起来我在递减阶段有一个竞争条件。这是我的测试代码
public static void main(String[] args) {
AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(Decrementer.MAX_SIZE)
ReadWriteLock lock = new ReentrantReadWriteLock()
for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
Decrementer d = new Decrementer(counter, lock)
new Thread(d).start()
}
}
public class Decrementer implements Runnable {
public final static int MAX_SIZE = 5
private ReadWriteLock lock
private AtomicInteger counter
public Decrementer(AtomicInteger counter, ReadWriteLock lock) {
this.counter = counter
this.lock = lock
}
public void run() {
while (true) {
try{
lock.readLock().lock()
int current = this.counter.decrementAndGet()
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " at counter " + current)
Thread.sleep(762)
} finally {
lock.readLock().unlock()
}
try {
lock.writeLock().lock()
int current = this.counter.get()
if (current <= 0) {
this.counter.set(Decrementer.MAX_SIZE)
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " reset " + current + " to " + Decrementer.MAX_SIZE)
Thread.sleep(4217)
}
} finally {
lock.writeLock().unlock()
}
}
}
}
这会给出以下奇怪的输出(计数器值为负),可能是由于缺少对 AtomicInteger 值的“同步”检查。
Thread-3 at counter 2
Thread-2 at counter 4
Thread-1 at counter 3
Thread-4 at counter 1
Thread-5 at counter 0
Thread-6 at counter -1
Thread-7 at counter -2
Thread-8 at counter -3
Thread-9 at counter -4
Thread-10 at counter -5
Thread-2 reset -5 to 5
Thread-3 at counter 4
Thread-4 at counter 2
Thread-2 at counter 3
Thread-1 at counter 1
Thread-5 at counter -3
Thread-10 at counter -4
Thread-7 at counter -1
Thread-6 at counter -2
Thread-8 at counter 0
Thread-9 at counter -5
Thread-9 reset -5 to 5
我还看到了 CountDownLatch 和 CyclicBarrier 类,但我的目标不是同步所有线程,而是确保计数器重置是原子的,并且不包括其他线程的其他修改。
您是否发现我在代码中遗漏了任何明显的并发问题?
【问题讨论】:
标签: java multithreading groovy concurrency synchronization