跳出 javascript 嵌套的 async.each 循环，但继续主循环答案

【问题标题】：Break out of javascript nested async.each loop but continue main loop跳出 javascript 嵌套的 async.each 循环，但继续主循环
【发布时间】：2014-06-28 06:58:22
【问题描述】：

我有一个名为 recipesArray 的对象数组。

recipesArray = [  [{name = "the recipe name", url = "http://recipeurl.com"},
                   {name = "the other neame", url = "http://adifferenturl.com"},
                   {name = "another recipe", url = "http://anotherurl.com"}],

                   [{name = "the recipe name", url = "http://recipeurl.com"},
                   {name = "the other neame", url = "http://adifferenturl.com"},
                   {name = "another recipe", url = "http://anotherurl.com"}],

                   [{name = "the recipe name", url = "http://recipeurl.com"},
                   {name = "the other neame", url = "http://adifferenturl.com"},
                   {name = "another recipe", url = "http://anotherurl.com"}] ]

我想跳出这个嵌套的 async.each 循环，但继续主 async.each 循环。

// main async.each
async.each(recipes, function(subArray, callback1) {
   // nested async.each
   async.each(subArray, function(theCurrentRecipe, callback2) {
      checkHREFS(theCurrentRecipe, function(thisRecipe) {
         if ('i have a conditional here') {
            // break out of this nested async.each, 
            // but continue the main async.each.
         } else {
            // continue
         }
         callback2();
      });
   }, callback1);
}, function(err) {
if (err) {
   return console.error(err);

   // success, all recipes iterated
});

【问题讨论】：

标签： javascript node.js loops asynchronous async.js

【解决方案1】：

一种方法可能是修改内部 each() 的最终回调，以检查具有特殊属性的 Error 对象，该属性表明您提前爆发并且这不是真正的错误。然后在您的条件中，将带有该属性集的错误对象传递给回调。

例子：

// main async.each
async.each(recipes, function(subArray, callback1) {
  // nested async.each
  async.each(subArray, function(theCurrentRecipe, callback2) {
    checkHREFS(theCurrentRecipe, function(thisRecipe) {
      if ('i have a conditional here') {
        // break out of this nested async.each, 
        // but continue the main async.each.
        var fakeErr = new Error();
        fakeErr.break = true;
        return callback2(fakeErr);
      }
      // continue
      callback2();
    });
  }, function(err) {
    if (err && err.break)
      callback1();
    else
      callback1(err);
  });
}, function(err) {
  if (err)
    return console.error(err);

  // success, all recipes iterated
});

【讨论】：

虽然我仍然想知道是否有比伪造错误更好的方法。
目前不使用async 模块，当我需要提前使用async 模块方法时，我实际上使用了这种模式。

【解决方案2】：

// inner async.each (simplificated)
  async.each(subArray, function(theCurrentRecipe, callback2) {
    checkHREFS(theCurrentRecipe, function(thisRecipe) {
      if ('i have a conditional here') {
        // going to break out of this nested async.each
        return callback2({flag:true}); // It doesn't have to be an "new Error()" ;-)
      }
      // continue
      callback2();
    });
  }, function(msg) {
    if (msg && msg.flag) // Here CHECK THE FLAG
      callback1(); // all good!... we brake out of the loop!
    else
      callback1(msg); // process possible ERROR.
  });

【讨论】：