【发布时间】:2017-11-20 20:01:38
【问题描述】:
我正在尝试使用Scatter 将矩阵列发送到其他进程。下面的代码非常适用于行,因此为了以最少的修改发送列,我使用 Numpy 转置函数。但是,这似乎没有任何效果,除非我制作一个完整的新矩阵副本(您可以想象,这违背了目的)。
以下 3 个最小示例来说明问题(必须运行 3 个进程!)。
-
分散行(按预期工作):
comm = MPI.COMM_WORLD rank = comm.Get_rank() size = comm.Get_size() A = np.zeros((3,3)) if rank==0: A = np.matrix([[1.,2.,3.],[4.,5.,6.],[7.,8.,9.]]) local_a = np.zeros(3) comm.Scatter(A, local_a, root=0) print "process", rank, "has", local_a给出输出:
process 0 has [ 1. 2. 3.] process 1 has [ 4. 5. 6.] process 2 has [ 7. 8. 9.] -
分散列(不起作用,仍然分散行...):
comm = MPI.COMM_WORLD rank = comm.Get_rank() size = comm.Get_size() A = np.zeros((3,3)) if rank==0: A = np.matrix([[1.,2.,3.],[4.,5.,6.],[7.,8.,9.]]).T local_a = np.zeros(3) comm.Scatter(A, local_a, root=0) print "process", rank, "has", local_a给出输出:
process 0 has [ 1. 2. 3.] process 1 has [ 4. 5. 6.] process 2 has [ 7. 8. 9.] -
分散列(有效,但似乎毫无意义):
comm = MPI.COMM_WORLD rank = comm.Get_rank() size = comm.Get_size() A = np.zeros((3,3)) if rank==0: A = np.matrix([[1.,2.,3.],[4.,5.,6.],[7.,8.,9.]]).T.copy() local_a = np.zeros(3) comm.Scatter(A, local_a, root=0) print "process", rank, "has", local_a最终给出想要的输出:
process 0 has [ 1. 4. 7.] process 2 has [ 3. 6. 9.] process 1 has [ 2. 5. 8.]
有没有一种简单的方法来发送列而不必复制整个矩阵?
对于上下文,我正在mpi4py tutorial 中进行练习 5。如果您想知道,我的完整解决方案(如上面第 3 点所示浪费内存)是这样的:
comm = MPI.COMM_WORLD
rank = comm.Get_rank()
size = comm.Get_size()
A = np.zeros((3,3))
v = np.zeros(3)
result = np.zeros(3)
if rank==0:
A = np.array([[1.,2.,3.],[4.,5.,6.],[7.,8.,9.]]).T.copy()
v = np.array([0.1,0.01,0.001])
# Scatter the columns of the matrix
local_a = np.zeros(3)
comm.Scatter(A, local_a, root=0)
# Scatter the elements of the vector
local_v = np.array([0.])
comm.Scatter(v, local_v, root=0)
print "process", rank, "has A_ij =", local_a, "and v_i", local_v
# Multiplication
local_result = local_a * local_v
# Add together
comm.Reduce(local_result, result, op=MPI.SUM)
print "process", rank, "finds", result, "(", local_result, ")"
if (rank==0):
print "The resulting vector is"
print " ", result, "computed in parallel"
print "and", np.dot(A.T,v), "computed serially."
这是@Sajid 要求的内存分析测试:
我的解决方案 3(给出正确答案):
0.027 MiB A = np.array([[1.,2.,3.],[4.,5.,6.],[7.,8.,9.]]).T.copy()
0.066 MiB comm.Scatter(A, local_a, root=0)
总计 = 0.093 MiB
另一个类似的解决方案(给出正确答案):
0.004 MiB A = np.array([[1.,2.,3.],[4.,5.,6.],[7.,8.,9.]])
0.090 MiB comm.Scatter(A.T.copy(), local_a, root=0)
总计 = 0.094 MiB
@Sajid 的解决方案(给出正确答案):
0.039 MiB A[:,:] = np.transpose(np.array([[1.,2.,3.],[4.,5.,6.],[7.,8.,9.]]))
0.062 MiB comm.Scatter(A, local_a, root=0)
总计 = 0.101 MiB
我的解决方案 2(给出错误答案):
0.004 MiB A = np.array([[1.,2.,3.],[4.,5.,6.],[7.,8.,9.]])
0.066 MiB comm.Scatter(A, local_a, root=0)
总计 = 0.070 MiB
(我只是从行中复制了内存增量,其中内存增量在代码版本之间有所不同。显然,这都是来自根节点。)
似乎很清楚,所有正确的解决方案都必须将数组复制到内存中。这是次优的,因为我只想分散列而不是行。
【问题讨论】:
标签: python numpy matrix mpi4py