【发布时间】:2018-04-16 22:49:40
【问题描述】:
函数中有多个 json_aggregates
我的 Postgres 数据库的主表与其他表有一对多的关系,每一个都由一个[*]_references 表连接。我需要一个以 JSON 形式从其他表返回的结果。我可以加入以获得我想要的数据:
SELECT ft.id, json_agg(genres) AS genres
FROM ft_references ft
INNER JOIN genre_references gr ON gr.reference_id = ft.id
INNER JOIN genres_catalog genres ON gr.genre_id = genres.id
WHERE ft.id = 2 GROUP BY ft.id;
id | genres
----+--------------------------------------------------
2 | [{"id":1,"name":"Action","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":2,"name":"Adventure","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":5,"name":"Comedy","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":8,"name":"Drama","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":10,"name":"Fantasy","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":13,"name":"Horror","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":25,"name":"War","other_info":null}]
(1 row)
同样是我的第二组结果:
SELECT ft.id, json_agg(tales) AS tales
FROM ft_references ft
INNER JOIN tale_references tr ON tr.reference_id = ft.id
INNER JOIN tale_catalog tales ON tales.id = tr.tale_catalog_id
WHERE ft.id = 2 GROUP BY ft.id;
id | tales
----+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 | [{"id":8,"tale_id":"124","tale_type":"The Three Brothers","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":39,"tale_id":"327A","tale_type":"Hansel and Gretel","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":82,"tale_id":"570","tale_type":"Pied Piper","other_info":null}]
(1 row)
这两个结果都是正确的。然而,当我想把它们放在一起时,突然间我得到了我的类型和故事结果的产物(即:三倍结果!):
SELECT ft.id, json_agg(genres) AS genres, json_agg(tale) AS tales
FROM ft_references ft
INNER JOIN genre_references gr ON gr.reference_id = ft.id
INNER JOIN genres_catalog genres ON gr.genre_id = genres.id
INNER JOIN tale_references tr ON tr.reference_id = ft.id
INNER JOIN tale_catalog tale ON tale.id = tr.tale_catalog_id
WHERE ft.id = 2 GROUP BY ft.id, gr.reference_id, tr.reference_id;
id | genres | tales
----+--------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 | [{"id":1,"name":"Action","other_info":null}, +| [{"id":82,"tale_id":"570","tale_type":"Pied Piper","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":1,"name":"Action","other_info":null}, +| {"id":39,"tale_id":"327A","tale_type":"Hansel and Gretel","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":1,"name":"Action","other_info":null}, +| {"id":8,"tale_id":"124","tale_type":"The Three Brothers","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":2,"name":"Adventure","other_info":null}, +| {"id":82,"tale_id":"570","tale_type":"Pied Piper","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":2,"name":"Adventure","other_info":null}, +| {"id":39,"tale_id":"327A","tale_type":"Hansel and Gretel","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":2,"name":"Adventure","other_info":null}, +| {"id":8,"tale_id":"124","tale_type":"The Three Brothers","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":5,"name":"Comedy","other_info":null}, +| {"id":82,"tale_id":"570","tale_type":"Pied Piper","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":5,"name":"Comedy","other_info":null}, +| {"id":39,"tale_id":"327A","tale_type":"Hansel and Gretel","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":5,"name":"Comedy","other_info":null}, +| {"id":8,"tale_id":"124","tale_type":"The Three Brothers","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":8,"name":"Drama","other_info":null}, +| {"id":82,"tale_id":"570","tale_type":"Pied Piper","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":8,"name":"Drama","other_info":null}, +| {"id":39,"tale_id":"327A","tale_type":"Hansel and Gretel","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":8,"name":"Drama","other_info":null}, +| {"id":8,"tale_id":"124","tale_type":"The Three Brothers","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":10,"name":"Fantasy","other_info":null}, +| {"id":82,"tale_id":"570","tale_type":"Pied Piper","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":10,"name":"Fantasy","other_info":null}, +| {"id":39,"tale_id":"327A","tale_type":"Hansel and Gretel","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":10,"name":"Fantasy","other_info":null}, +| {"id":8,"tale_id":"124","tale_type":"The Three Brothers","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":13,"name":"Horror","other_info":null}, +| {"id":82,"tale_id":"570","tale_type":"Pied Piper","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":13,"name":"Horror","other_info":null}, +| {"id":39,"tale_id":"327A","tale_type":"Hansel and Gretel","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":13,"name":"Horror","other_info":null}, +| {"id":8,"tale_id":"124","tale_type":"The Three Brothers","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":25,"name":"War","other_info":null}, +| {"id":82,"tale_id":"570","tale_type":"Pied Piper","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":25,"name":"War","other_info":null}, +| {"id":39,"tale_id":"327A","tale_type":"Hansel and Gretel","other_info":null}, +
| {"id":25,"name":"War","other_info":null}] | {"id":8,"tale_id":"124","tale_type":"The Three Brothers","other_info":null}]
(1 row)
如何重组我的查询,以便只获得第一个示例中正确的“流派”结果以及第二个示例中正确的“故事”结果,而不是像我的实际(第三个)例子?
【问题讨论】:
-
你为什么突然按这么多东西分组?像以前一样按 ft.id 分组,这行不通?
-
否;我尝试了各种分组,结果总是一样的,即使只有一个分组。
-
我相信你可以通过像
json_agg(DISTINCT genres)这样的事情来解决这个问题,这实际上可能是连接的问题,它会让你重复但在我半睡半醒的状态下我不能告诉你什么。
标签: sql json postgresql aggregate-functions