【发布时间】:2013-04-19 01:20:53
【问题描述】:
基于SQLite foreign key documentation,应该是创建两个数据库的方式,如果父字段更新,引用父字段的字段也会更新。
问题:按照以下步骤操作后,一切正常,直到最后一个命令
SELECT * FROM track; 因为结果仍然与下面的相同,因此它应该更改为最后显示的结果。
trackid trackname trackartist
------- ----------------- -----------
11 That's Amore 1
12 Christmas Blues 1
13 My Way 2
编码:
-- Database schema
CREATE TABLE artist(
artistid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
artistname TEXT
);
CREATE TABLE track(
trackid INTEGER,
trackname TEXT,
trackartist INTEGER REFERENCES artist(artistid) ON UPDATE CASCADE
);
sqlite> SELECT * FROM artist;
artistid artistname
-------- -----------------
1 Dean Martin
2 Frank Sinatra
sqlite> SELECT * FROM track;
trackid trackname trackartist
------- ----------------- -----------
11 That's Amore 1
12 Christmas Blues 1
13 My Way 2
sqlite> -- Update the artistid column of the artist record for "Dean Martin".
sqlite> -- Normally, this would raise a constraint, as it would orphan the two
sqlite> -- dependent records in the track table. However, the ON UPDATE CASCADE clause
sqlite> -- attached to the foreign key definition causes the update to "cascade"
sqlite> -- to the child table, preventing the foreign key constraint violation.
sqlite> UPDATE artist SET artistid = 100 WHERE artistname = 'Dean Martin';
sqlite> SELECT * FROM artist;
artistid artistname
-------- -----------------
2 Frank Sinatra
100 Dean Martin
sqlite> SELECT * FROM track;
trackid trackname trackartist
------- ----------------- -----------
11 That's Amore 100
12 Christmas Blues 100
13 My Way 2
这是为什么?
【问题讨论】:
标签: sql database sqlite foreign-keys