为什么 QueryperformanceCounter 的计时与挂钟不同？

Question

您好，我正在使用 QueryperformanceCounter 在 Delphi 中对一段代码进行计时。出于某种原因， 我使用 QueryPerformanceCounter 获得的毫秒数与我使用秒表获得的挂钟时间完全不同。例如秒表给我大约 33 秒，如果不准确，这似乎是正确的，但使用 QueryPerofomanceCounter 会给我一个像 500 毫秒的数字。

当单步执行我的代码时，我可以看到 QueryPerformanceFrequency 为我的 CPU 提供了正确的 CPU 频率，Core2 E6600 为 2.4G。因此，如果刻度数正确，(tick number / Freq) * 1000 应该为我正在计时的代码提供正确的执行时间，但为什么不呢？

我知道对于我尝试计时的代码，QeuryPerformanceCounter 可能会过度杀戮，因为它需要几秒钟而不是 MillionSeconds，但我更感兴趣的是了解挂钟和 QueryPerormanceCounter 之间时间差的原因。

如果相关，我的硬件是 E6600 Core2，操作系统是 Windows 7 X64。

unit PerformanceTimer;

interface

uses Windows, SysUtils, DateUtils;

type TPerformanceTimer = class
  private
    fFrequency : TLargeInteger;
    fIsRunning: boolean;
    fIsHighResolution: boolean;
    fStartCount, FstopCount : TLargeInteger;
    procedure SetTickStamp(var lInt : TLargeInteger) ;
    function GetElapsedTicks: TLargeInteger;
    function GetElapsedMiliseconds: TLargeInteger;
  public
    constructor Create(const startOnCreate : boolean = false) ;
    procedure Start;
    procedure Stop;
    property IsHighResolution : boolean read fIsHighResolution;
    property ElapsedTicks : TLargeInteger read GetElapsedTicks;
    property ElapsedMiliseconds : TLargeInteger read GetElapsedMiliseconds;
    property IsRunning : boolean read fIsRunning;
end;

implementation

constructor TPerformanceTimer.Create(const startOnCreate : boolean = false) ;
begin
  inherited Create;

  fIsRunning := false;

  fIsHighResolution := QueryPerformanceFrequency(fFrequency) ;
  if NOT fIsHighResolution then
    fFrequency := MSecsPerSec;

  if startOnCreate then
    Start;
end;

function TPerformanceTimer.GetElapsedTicks: TLargeInteger;
begin
  result := fStopCount - fStartCount;
end;

procedure TPerformanceTimer.SetTickStamp(var lInt : TLargeInteger) ;
begin
  if fIsHighResolution then
    QueryPerformanceCounter(lInt)
  else
    lInt := MilliSecondOf(Now) ;
end;

function TPerformanceTimer.GetElapsedMiliseconds: TLargeInteger;
begin
  result := (MSecsPerSec * (fStopCount - fStartCount)) div fFrequency;
end;

procedure TPerformanceTimer.Start;
begin
  SetTickStamp(fStartCount) ;
  fIsRunning := true;
end;

procedure TPerformanceTimer.Stop;
begin
  SetTickStamp(fStopCount) ;
  fIsRunning := false;
end;

end.

Answer 1

这段代码对我有用，也许你可以试试：

  var
    ifrequency, icount1, icount2: Int64;
    fmsec: Double;
  begin
    QueryPerformanceFrequency(ifrequency);
    QueryPerformanceCounter(icount1);
    Sleep(500);
    QueryPerformanceCounter(icount2);
    fmsec := 1000 * ((icount2 - icount1) / ifrequency);
  end;

fmsec 大约是 499.6 或类似的值。

注意：不要依赖 Now 或 TickCount 来处理小数字：它们有大约 10 毫秒的间隔（取决于 Windows 版本）！因此，如果您使用 Now 和 DateUtils.MillisecondsBetween，“sleep(10)”的持续时间可以为 0ms

注意 2：不要长时间依赖 QueryPerformanceCounter，因为它的时间会在一天中慢慢消失（每分钟大约 1 毫秒差异）

Answer 2

如果您的硬件支持动态频率缩放，则意味着 QueryPerformanceFrequency 不能返回一个静态值来连续描述动态变化的值。每当计算量大的东西开始时，适应的 CPU 速度都会阻止精确测量。

至少，在我的笔记本上体验过 - 当它更改为更高的时钟频率时，基于 QueryPerformanceCounter 的测量被搞砸了。

因此，无论提供更高的精度，我仍然在大多数情况下使用 GetTickCount 来实现此类目的（但基于 DateTime 的测量也可以，如前所述，除非可能发生时区切换），并带有一些“温暖- up”代码段开始消耗 CPU 功率，因此当相关代码段开始执行时，CPU 速度处于其（恒定）最大值。

Answer 3

你应该发布一个代码 sn-p 来演示这个问题......但我会假设你有一个错误：

Milliseconds := 1000 * ((StopCount - StartCount) / Frequency);

如果您要与秒表进行比较，您可能会采用更简单的方法，只需捕获之前和之后的 TDateTime（使用 Now()），然后使用 DateUtils MilliSecondSpan () 计算差值的方法：

var
  MyStartDate:TDateTime;
  MyStopDate:TDateTime;
  MyTiming:Double;
begin
  MyStartDate := Now();
  DoSomethingYouWantTimed();
  MyStopDate := Now();
  MyTiming := MilliSecondSpan(MyStopDate, MyStartDate);
  DoSomethingWithTiming(MyTiming);
end;

Answer 4

我使用 NTP 服务器定期同步 PC 时钟，长时间同步 PC 时钟以调整 QueryPerformanceCounter“滴答”时间，并使用校准的 QueryPerformanceCounter 时间进行精确的时间测量。在时钟漂移较低的良好服务器上，这意味着我在时间段内的准确性远低于一毫秒，并且我所有机器的时钟时间同步在一两毫秒内。下面附上部分相关代码：

function NowInternal: TDateTime;
const
  // maximum time in seconds between synchronising the high-resolution clock
  MAX_SYNC_TIME = 10;
var
  lPerformanceCount: Int64;
  lResult: TDateTime;
  lDateTimeSynchronised: Boolean;
begin
  // check that the the high-resolution performance counter frequency has been
  // initialised
  fDateTimeCritSect.Enter;
  try
    if (fPerformanceFrequency < 0) and
       not QueryPerformanceFrequency(fPerformanceFrequency) then
      fPerformanceFrequency := 0;

    if fPerformanceFrequency > 0 then begin
      // get the return value from the the high-resolution performance counter
      if (fWindowsStartTime <> CSI_NULL_DATE_TIME) and
         QueryPerformanceCounter(lPerformanceCount) then
        lResult := fWindowsStartTime +
                   lPerformanceCount / fPerformanceFrequency / SecsPerDay
      else
        lResult := CSI_NULL_DATE_TIME;

      if (MilliSecondsBetween(lResult, Now) >= MAX_CLOCK_DIFF) or
         (SecondsBetween(Now, fLastSyncTime) >= MAX_SYNC_TIME) then begin
        // resynchronise the high-resolution clock due to clock differences or
        // at least every 10 seconds
        lDateTimeSynchronised := SyncDateTime;

        // get the return value from the the high-resolution performance counter
        if (fWindowsStartTime <> CSI_NULL_DATE_TIME) and
           QueryPerformanceCounter(lPerformanceCount) then
          lResult := fWindowsStartTime +
                     lPerformanceCount / fPerformanceFrequency / SecsPerDay;

      end else
        lDateTimeSynchronised := False;

      if MilliSecondsBetween(lResult, Now) >= (MAX_CLOCK_DIFF * 2) then
        // default the return value to the standard low-resolution value if
        // anything has gone wrong
        Result := Now
      else
        Result := lResult;

    end else begin
      lDateTimeSynchronised := False;

      // default the return value to the standard low-resolution value because
      // we cannot use the high-resolution clock
      Result := Now;
    end;
  finally
    fDateTimeCritSect.Leave;
  end;

  if lDateTimeSynchronised then
    CsiGlobals.AddLogMsg('High-resolution clock synchronised', CSI_LC_CLOCK);
end;

function SyncDateTime: Boolean;
var
  lPriorityClass: Cardinal;
  lThreadPriority: Integer;
  lInitTime: TDateTime;
  lNextTime: TDateTime;
  lPerformanceCount: Int64;
  lHighResCurrentTime: TDateTime;
  lLowResCurrentTime: TDateTime;
begin
  // synchronise the high-resolution date/time structure (boost the thread
  // priority as high as possible during synchronisation)
  lPriorityClass := CsiGetProcessPriorityClass;
  lThreadPriority := CsiGetCurrentThreadPriority;
  try
    CsiSetProcessPriorityClass(REALTIME_PRIORITY_CLASS);
    CsiSetCurrentThreadPriority(THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL);

    // loop until the low-resolution date/time value changes (this will load the
    // CPU, but only for a maximum of around 15 milliseconds)
    lInitTime := Now;
    lNextTime := Now;
    while lNextTime = lInitTime do
      lNextTime := Now;

    // adjust the high-resolution performance counter frequency for clock drift
    if (fWindowsStartTime <> CSI_NULL_DATE_TIME) and
       QueryPerformanceCounter(lPerformanceCount) then begin
      lHighResCurrentTime := fWindowsStartTime +
                             lPerformanceCount / fPerformanceFrequency /
                             SecsPerDay;
      lLowResCurrentTime := Now;
      if MilliSecondsBetween(lHighResCurrentTime, lLowResCurrentTime) <
         (MAX_CLOCK_DIFF * 2) then
        fPerformanceFrequency := Round((1 +
                                       (lHighResCurrentTime -
                                        lLowResCurrentTime) /
                                       (lLowResCurrentTime - fLastSyncTime)) *
                                       fPerformanceFrequency);
    end;

    // save the Windows start time by extrapolating the high-resolution
    // performance counter value back to zero
    if QueryPerformanceCounter(lPerformanceCount) then begin
      fWindowsStartTime := lNextTime -
                           lPerformanceCount / fPerformanceFrequency /
                           SecsPerDay;
      fLastSyncTime := Now;
      Result := True;

    end else
      Result := False;
  finally
    CsiSetCurrentThreadPriority(lThreadPriority);
    CsiSetProcessPriorityClass(lPriorityClass);
  end;
end;