【问题标题】:Detached signature in CMSSignedData verifies using Bouncy Castle but NOT using java.security.SignatureCMSSignedData 中的分离签名使用 Bouncy Castle 进行验证,但不使用 java.security.Signature
【发布时间】:2018-01-18 10:44:41
【问题描述】:

我已经在网上浏览了几天以找到导致此问题的原因,但没有成功。

我正在这样做

  • 生成新证书(签名者证书及其父级)
  • 使用 CMSSignedDataGenerator 创建签名(bouncycastle 1.45
  • 通过 java.security.Signature 验证 -> 失败
  • 通过 BC 类验证 -> 成功

我发现的事实

  • 签名的创建和验证使用相同的算法 - SHA1withRSA。
  • 在进程的任何地方都不会抛出异常。

问题

  • 知道我做错了什么吗?

需要考虑的想法

我认为原因在于签名的生成,但我想我是根据文档进行的。或者 - 验证过程可能期望某种不同的结构,例如 PKCS1,而生成器提供 PKCS7。实际上没有什么能告诉我接下来要搜索什么。

这是一段代码,应该说明问题和输出(在提供您自己的证书和私钥之后):

import org.bouncycastle.cms.*;
import org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider;

import java.security.PrivateKey;
import java.security.Security;
import java.security.Signature;
import java.security.cert.CertStore;
import java.security.cert.CollectionCertStoreParameters;
import java.security.cert.X509Certificate;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;

import static org.bouncycastle.cms.CMSSignedGenerator.DIGEST_SHA1;
import static org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider.PROVIDER_NAME;


public final class VerifyCMSSignedData {

    private static final byte[] DATA_TO_BE_SIGNED = "data".getBytes();
    private static final String SHA_1_WITH_RSA = "SHA1WithRSA";
    private static final boolean DATA_NOT_ATTACHED = false;
    private static final String COLLECTION_STORE_TYPE = "Collection";

    private static X509Certificate signer;
    private static PrivateKey signerPrivateKey;
    private static X509Certificate parent;

    private VerifyCMSSignedData() {
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());

        setUpCertificates();

        shouldVerifySignature();
    }

    public static void shouldVerifySignature() throws Exception {
        CMSSignedData signature = createSignature();

        shouldVerifyBySignature(signature.getEncoded());

        shouldVerifyByBC(signature.getEncoded());
    }

    private static void shouldVerifyByBC(byte[] signatureBytes) {
        boolean verified = false;

        try {
            CMSSignedData cms = new CMSSignedData(new CMSProcessableByteArray(DATA_TO_BE_SIGNED), signatureBytes);
            CertStore certStore = cms.getCertificatesAndCRLs(COLLECTION_STORE_TYPE, PROVIDER_NAME);
            SignerInformationStore signers = cms.getSignerInfos();
            Collection c = signers.getSigners();
            for (Object aC : c) {
                SignerInformation signer = (SignerInformation) aC;
                Collection certCollection = certStore.getCertificates(signer.getSID());
                Iterator certIt = certCollection.iterator();
                X509Certificate cert = (X509Certificate) certIt.next();
                verified = signer.verify(cert, PROVIDER_NAME);
            }
        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
            verified = false;
        }

        System.out.println(verified ? "VERIFIED BY BC" : "! Not verified through BC !");
    }

    private static void shouldVerifyBySignature(byte[] signatureBytes) throws Exception {
        Signature signatureVerifier = Signature.getInstance(SHA_1_WITH_RSA, PROVIDER_NAME);
        signatureVerifier.initVerify(signer.getPublicKey());
        signatureVerifier.update(DATA_TO_BE_SIGNED);
        boolean verified = signatureVerifier.verify(signatureBytes);

        System.out.println(verified ? "VERIFIED BY SIGNATURE CLASS" : "! Not verified by Signature class !");
    }

    private static CMSSignedData createSignature() throws Exception {
        CMSSignedDataGenerator gen = new CMSSignedDataGenerator();

        gen.addSigner(signerPrivateKey, signer, DIGEST_SHA1);

        List<X509Certificate> allCerts = new ArrayList<>();
        if (parent != null) {
            allCerts.add(parent);
        }
        allCerts.add(signer);

        CertStore store = CertStore.getInstance(
                COLLECTION_STORE_TYPE,
                new CollectionCertStoreParameters(allCerts),
                PROVIDER_NAME
        );

        gen.addCertificatesAndCRLs(store);

        return gen.generate(new CMSProcessableByteArray(DATA_TO_BE_SIGNED), DATA_NOT_ATTACHED, PROVIDER_NAME);
    }

    private static void setUpCertificates() throws Exception {
        // TODO setup your certificates here
    }
}

输出

!未经签名类验证!

由 BC 验证

进程以退出代码 0 结束

【问题讨论】:

    标签: java digital-signature bouncycastle verify pkcs#7


    【解决方案1】:

    您正在验证不同的事情。验证永远不会成功,因为 Java SHA1withRSA 验证需要 RSA PKCS#1_v15 签名,但您已生成 CMS 签名

    CMS 封装了数字签名或加密消息以及一些附加元素,例如证书。您的 CMS 消息包含 PCKS#1 签名,但如果您想直接使用 Java Api 对其进行验证,请注意签名哈希不是根据要签名的数据计算的。它包含一些附加元素,例如在 ASN.1 语法中对签名证书的引用,因此您需要以相同的方式计算哈希

    【讨论】:

    • PKCS7/CMS 确实允许仅对数据进行签名的选项,称为“直接”,尽管这种情况很少见(并且不是 BC 的默认设置);当使用 signedattrs 时,它们必须包含内容哈希和内容类型,但对签名证书的引用不是必需的,也不是通用的。 (同意 SignedData 格式与原始签名不同且复杂得多。)
    【解决方案2】:

    你错了:

    signatureVerifier.update(DATA_TO_BE_SIGNED);

    这里:

    布尔验证 = signatureVerifier.verify(signatureBytes);

    See pedrofb's answer for more details.

    修改您的 shouldVerifyBySignature 方法以使其工作:

    private static void shouldVerifyBySignature(byte[] signatureBytes) throws Exception {
        boolean verified = false;
        CMSSignedData cms = new CMSSignedData(new CMSProcessableByteArray(DATA_TO_BE_SIGNED), signatureBytes);
        CertStore certStore = cms.getCertificatesAndCRLs(COLLECTION_STORE_TYPE, PROVIDER_NAME);
        SignerInformationStore signers = cms.getSignerInfos();
        Collection c = signers.getSigners();
        for (Object aC : c) {
            SignerInformation si = (SignerInformation) aC;
            Signature signatureVerifier = Signature.getInstance(SHA_1_WITH_RSA, PROVIDER_NAME);
            signatureVerifier.initVerify(signer.getPublicKey());
    
    
            signatureVerifier.update(si.getEncodedSignedAttributes());
            verified = signatureVerifier.verify(si.getSignature());
        }
    
        System.out.println(verified ? "VERIFIED BY SIGNATURE CLASS" : "! Not verified by Signature class !");
    }
    

    希望对你有帮助!

    【讨论】:

      猜你喜欢
      • 2016-10-01
      • 1970-01-01
      • 1970-01-01
      • 2017-12-04
      • 1970-01-01
      • 2015-07-03
      • 2012-03-02
      • 1970-01-01
      • 1970-01-01
      相关资源
      最近更新 更多