根据这个简单的测试(至少对于 Linux)来说,这似乎是矫枉过正:
#! /usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
my $interrupt = 0;
sub sigint {
++$interrupt;
}
$SIG{INT} = \&sigint;
my $line = <STDIN>;
print "interrupt = $interrupt\n",
"line = $line";
运行它:
$ ./prog.pl
foo^Cbar
中断 = 1
线=条
你在打字稿中看到^C,我按下了Ctrl-C。
中断套接字读取有点棘手,所以全力以赴:
#! /usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use IO::Select;
use IO::Socket;
use IPC::SysV qw/ IPC_PRIVATE S_IRUSR S_IWUSR IPC_CREAT /;
use IPC::Semaphore;
use Time::HiRes qw/ usleep /;
# Keep $SEND_INTERVAL larger than $KILL_INTERVAL to
# allow many signals to be sent.
my $PORT = 55555;
my $INTERFACE = "eth0";
my $DEFAULT_MTU = 1500;
my $KILL_INTERVAL = 0; # microseconds
my $SEND_INTERVAL = 200_000; # microseconds
my $NUM_READLINES = 100;
sub addr_mtu {
my($interface) = @_;
my($addr,$mtu);
if (open my $ifcfg, "-|", "ifconfig $interface") {
while (<$ifcfg>) {
$addr = $1 if /inet\s+addr\s*:\s*(\S+)/;
$mtu = $1 if /MTU\s*:\s*(\d+)/;
}
}
die "$0: no address" unless defined $addr;
unless (defined $mtu) {
$mtu = $DEFAULT_MTU;
warn "$0: defaulting MTU to $mtu";
}
($addr,$mtu);
}
sub build_packet {
my($len) = @_;
my $seed = join "" => 0 .. 9, 'A' .. 'Z', 'a' .. 'z';
my $packet = "";
$packet .= $seed while length($packet) < $len;
substr($packet, 0, $len-2) . "\r\n";
}
sub take {
my($sem) = @_;
while (1) {
$sem->op(
0, 0, 0,
0, 1, 0,
);
return unless $!;
next if $!{EINTR};
die "$0: semop: $!";
}
}
sub give {
my($sem) = @_;
while (1) {
$sem->op(0, -1, 0);
return unless $!;
next if $!{EINTR};
die "$0: semop: $!";
}
}
my($addr,$mtu) = addr_mtu $INTERFACE;
my $pkt = build_packet $mtu;
my $lsn = IO::Socket::INET->new(Listen => 1, LocalAddr => "$addr:$PORT", ReuseAddr => 1);
die "$0: create listen socket: $!" unless defined $lsn;
my $interrupt = 0;
sub sigint {
++$interrupt;
}
$SIG{INT} = \&sigint;
my $sem = IPC::Semaphore->new(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|IPC_CREAT);
die unless defined $sem;
$sem->setall(1);
my $parent = $$;
my $pid = fork;
die "$0: fork: $!" unless defined $pid;
if ($pid == 0) {
warn "$0: [$$] killer\n";
my $sent;
while (1) {
my $n = kill INT => $parent;
++$sent;
unless ($n > 0) {
warn "$0: kill INT $parent: $!" if $!;
warn "$0: [$$] killer exiting; sent=$sent\n";
exit 0;
}
# try to stay under 120 pending-signal max
if ($sent % 100 == 0) {
usleep $KILL_INTERVAL;
}
}
}
$pid = fork;
die "$0: fork: $!" unless defined $pid;
if ($pid == 0) {
warn "$0: [$$] sender\n";
my $s = IO::Socket::INET->new(PeerAddr => "$addr:$PORT");
unless (defined $s) {
warn "$0: failed to connect to $addr:$PORT";
kill TERM => $parent;
exit 1;
}
warn "$0: [$$]: connected to parent\n";
give $sem;
my $n;
while (1) {
my $bytes = $s->send($pkt, 0);
warn("$0: send: $!"), last unless defined $bytes;
warn("$0: short send ($bytes vs. $mtu)"), last unless $bytes == $mtu;
++$n;
warn "$0: [$$] sent $n" if $n % 50 == 0;
usleep $SEND_INTERVAL;
}
$s->close;
warn "$0: [$$]: sender exiting\n";
exit 1;
}
take $sem;
my $fh = $lsn->accept;
$lsn->close;
$/ = "\r\n";
for (my $n = 1; $n <= $NUM_READLINES; ++$n) {
warn "$0: [$$] n=$n; interrupt=$interrupt\n";
my $line = <$fh>;
my $len = length $line;
warn "$0: FAILED: mtu=$mtu; got $len\n" unless $len == $mtu;
}
$fh->close;
warn "$0: parent exiting; interrupt=$interrupt\n";
exit 0;
这不会在我的 Linux 主机上产生短读。其输出结束:
./server: [28633] n=97;中断=104665
./服务器:[28633] n=98;中断=105936
./服务器:[28633] n=99;中断=107208
./服务器:[28633] n=100;中断=108480
./server: [28637] 在 ./server 第 132 行发送了 100。
./server: 父级退出;中断=109751
./server: kill INT 28633: ./server 第 100 行没有这样的进程。
./server: [28636] 杀手退出;发送=11062802
如果我真的提高信号速率,我会收到警告
已超过挂起信号的最大计数 (120)。
与<$fh> 在线以及在全球销毁期间,但在您的程序中您无能为力。
您引用的文档包含:
请注意,默认的:perlio 层将重试read、write 和close,如上所述,中断的wait 和waitpid 调用将始终重试。
以上两个测试程序的行为表明,这很可能是正在发生的事情,即,readline 中的read 在中断时会正常重启。