【发布时间】:2021-09-18 20:09:35
【问题描述】:
您好,我们试图通过将一个巨大的选择分割成更小的选择来并行化它。数据集有一个“segment”列,因此我们使用它作为分区选择的一种方式。我们的目标是一个 PosgreSQL 数据库。不幸的是,我们没有观察到性能优势,换句话说,性能提升与我们使用的线程成线性关系。
我们能够将我们的观察结果隔离到一个综合测试用例中。 我们将多次提取 (11) 模拟为从 generate_series 查询中提取的每一个。
我们使用 1 个连接,每个连接按顺序运行或 11 个连接并行运行。
我们没有观察到性能优势。
相反,如果我们只是将提取模拟为阻塞 5 秒 (QUERY1) 的 1 行提取,我们将获得预期的性能优势。
我们用来并行化的主要代码。
def pandas_per_segment(the_conn_pool, segment)-> List[Tuple]:
print(f"TASK is {segment}")
sql_query = config.QUERY2
with the_conn_pool.getconn() as conn:
conn.set_session(readonly=True, autocommit=True)
start = default_timer()
with conn.cursor() as curs:
curs.execute(sql_query)
data = curs.fetchall()
end = default_timer()
print(f'DB to retrieve {segment} took : {end - start:.5f}')
the_conn_pool.putconn(conn)
return data
def get_sales(the_conn_pool) -> pd.DataFrame:
tasks : Dict = {}
start = default_timer()
with futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=config.TASKS) as executor:
for segment in range(0, config.SEGMENTS_NO):
task = executor.submit(pandas_per_segment,
the_conn_pool = the_conn_pool,
segment=segment)
tasks[task] = segment
end = default_timer()
print(f'Consumed : {end-start:.5f}')
start = default_timer()
master_list = [task.result() or task in tasks]
result = pd.DataFrame(itertools.chain(*master_list), columns=['item_id', 'brand_name', 'is_exclusive', 'units', 'revenue', 'abs_price', 'segment', 'matches_filter'])
end = default_timer()
print(f'Chained : {end - start:.5f}')
return result
通过直接从 CSV 提取,我们也看到了相同的性能优势。
理论上说,Python 中的套接字/线程/大数据获取效果不佳。
这是正确的吗?我们是不是做错了什么。
在 Big Sur x64、Python 3.9.6、Postgresql 13 上进行测试,附上其余代码
我们的 docker-compose 文件
version: '2'
services:
database:
container_name:
posgres
image: 'docker.io/bitnami/postgresql:latest'
ports:
- '5432:5432'
volumes:
- 'postgresql_data:/bitnami/postgresql'
environment:
- POSTGRESQL_USERNAME=my_user
- POSTGRESQL_PASSWORD=password123
- POSTGRESQL_DATABASE=mn_dataset
networks:
- pgtapper
volumes:
postgresql_data:
driver: local
networks:
pgtapper:
driver: bridge
config.py 文件
TASKS = 1
SEGMENTS_NO = 11
HOST='localhost'
PORT=5432
DBNAME='mn_dataset'
USER='my_user'
PASSWORD='password123'
# PORT=15433
# DBNAME='newron'
# USER='flyway'
# PASSWORD='8P87PE8HKuvjQaAP'
CONNECT_TIMEOUT=600
QUERY1 = '''
select
123456789 as item_id,
'm$$$' as brand_name,
true as is_exclusive,
0.409 as units,
0.567 as revenue,
0.999 as abs_price,
'aaaa' as segment,
TRUE as matches_filter
from (select pg_sleep(5)) xxx
'''
QUERY3 = '''
select * from t1 LIMIT 10000
'''
QUERY2 = '''
select
123456789 as item_id,
'm$$$' as brand_name,
true as is_exclusive,
0.409 as units,
0.567 as revenue,
0.999 as abs_price,
'aaaa' as segment,
TRUE as matches_filter
from generate_series(1, 10000)
'''
MYSQL_QUERY = '''
select
123456789 as item_id,
'm$$$' as brand_name,
true as is_exclusive,
0.409 as units,
0.567 as revenue,
0.999 as abs_price,
'aaaa' as segment,
TRUE as matches_filter
from t1
limit 10000
'''
以及我们的完整示例
# This is a sample Python script.
# Press ⌃R to execute it or replace it with your code.
# Press Double ⇧ to search everywhere for classes, files, tool windows, actions, and settings.
import itertools
from psycopg2.pool import ThreadedConnectionPool
from concurrent import futures
from timeit import default_timer
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple
import config
import pandas as pd
def pandas_per_segment(the_conn_pool, segment)-> List[Tuple]:
print(f"TASK is {segment}")
sql_query = config.QUERY2
with the_conn_pool.getconn() as conn:
conn.set_session(readonly=True, autocommit=True)
start = default_timer()
with conn.cursor() as curs:
curs.execute(sql_query)
data = curs.fetchall()
end = default_timer()
print(f'DB to retrieve {segment} took : {end - start:.5f}')
the_conn_pool.putconn(conn)
return data
def get_sales(the_conn_pool) -> pd.DataFrame:
tasks : Dict = {}
start = default_timer()
with futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=config.TASKS) as executor:
for segment in range(0, config.SEGMENTS_NO):
task = executor.submit(pandas_per_segment,
the_conn_pool = the_conn_pool,
segment=segment)
tasks[task] = segment
end = default_timer()
print(f'Consumed : {end-start:.5f}')
start = default_timer()
master_list = [task.result() or task in tasks]
result = pd.DataFrame(itertools.chain(*master_list), columns=['item_id', 'brand_name', 'is_exclusive', 'units', 'revenue', 'abs_price', 'segment', 'matches_filter'])
end = default_timer()
print(f'Chained : {end - start:.5f}')
return result
# Press the green button in the gutter to run the script.
if __name__ == '__main__':
connection_pool = ThreadedConnectionPool(
minconn=config.TASKS,
maxconn=config.TASKS,
host=config.HOST,
port=config.PORT,
dbname=config.DBNAME,
user=config.USER,
password=config.PASSWORD,
connect_timeout=config.CONNECT_TIMEOUT
)
get_sales(connection_pool)
# See PyCharm help at https://www.jetbrains.com/help/pycharm/
【问题讨论】:
-
尝试使用 psycopgs2.extras.execute_batch,这里的问题是分离查询不会提高性能,因为它会增加服务器往返时间。如果多次询问,数据库将不会更快地获取结果。
-
执行批处理序列化,文档说它是 executemany 的一个很好的替代品,主要用于更新。我不更新了。我在上面取。
-
必须从磁盘获取相同数量的数据,并通过网络发送相同数量的数据。为什么你认为线程会有所帮助? (除了,也许,在客户端)
-
客户端是我的要求。我有一个数据集,每一行在一组 11 个可能值中都有一个段字段。不是获取整个数据集,而是生成 11 个线程来获取对应于相应段的数据集部分,并在客户端组成最终结果。我已经在下面发布了我的 github,您可以从那里克隆并运行 raw_main.py(您需要启动 docker-compose)。
标签: python pandas postgresql performance psycopg2