【发布时间】:2016-10-12 22:11:48
【问题描述】:
我很难理解为什么下面的递归代码(函数 count())给出了错误的计算计数,但基于手动编写的嵌套 for 循环(函数 count2())给出了正确的计数,即嗯! * 4 ^ (n-1)?
(此时不要在意输出变量。我稍后会使用它,如果我能先解决这个难题。)
我希望创建一个递归函数,可以为任意长度的列表创建计算,这就是为什么仅仅嵌套 for 循环是不够的。
import itertools
import operator
# http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2983139/assign-operator-to-variable-in-python
ops = {
0: operator.add,
1: operator.sub,
2: operator.mul,
3: operator.truediv
}
comb = [4, 1, 2, 3]
perms = list()
# itertools.permutations is not subscriptable, so this is a mandatory step.
# See e.g. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/216972/in-python-what-does-it-mean-if-an-object-is-subscriptable-or-not
# for details.
for i in itertools.permutations(comb):
perms.append(i)
output = list()
output2 = list()
# In theory, there are n! * 4 ^ (n-1) possibilities for each set.
# In practice however some of these are redundant, because multiplication and
# addition are indifferent to calculation order. That's not tested here;
# nor is the possibility of division by zero.
# Variable debug is there just to enable checking the calculation count;
# it serves no other purpose.
debug = list()
debug2 = list()
def count(i):
for j in range(len(i)):
for op in ops:
if j+1 < len(i):
res = ops[op](i[j], i[j+1])
if j+2 < len(i):
ls = list(i[j+1:])
ls[0] = res
count(ls)
else:
debug.append([len(i), i[j], ops[op], i[j+1], res])
if res == 10: output.append(res)
def count2(i):
for j in range(len(i)):
for op in ops:
if j+1 < len(i):
res = ops[op](i[j], i[j+1])
for op2 in ops:
if j+2 < len(i):
res2 = ops[op2](res, i[j+2])
for op3 in ops:
if j+3 < len(i):
res3 = ops[op3](res2, i[j+3])
debug2.append(res3)
if res3 == 10: output2.append(res3)
for i in perms:
count(i)
count2(i)
print(len(debug)) # The result is 2400, which is wrong.
print(len(debug2)) # The result is 1536, which is correct.
【问题讨论】:
标签: python recursion permutation