【问题标题】:Finding partial matches between two different dataframes' columns, and assigning values when matches are found查找两个不同数据框列之间的部分匹配,并在找到匹配时分配值
【发布时间】:2019-06-06 11:26:31
【问题描述】:

我想用df2 数据框的“类别”列中的正确值填充df1 数据框的“类别”列。

import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({"Receiver": ["Insurance company", "Shop", "Pizza place", "Library", "Gas station 24/7", "Something else", "Whatever receiver"], "Category": ["","","","","","",""]}) 
df2 = pd.DataFrame({"Category": ["Insurances", "Groceries", "Groceries", "Fastfood", "Fastfood", "Car"], "Searchterm": ["Insurance", "Shop", "Market", "Pizza", "Burger", "Gas"]})

输出:

df1
Receiver                Category
0   Insurance company   
1   Shop    
2   Pizza place 
3   Library 
4   Gas station 24/7    
5   Something else  
6   Whatever receiver   

df2
    Category    Searchterm
0   Insurances  Insur
1   Groceries   Shop
2   Groceries   Market
3   Fastfood    Pizza
4   Fastfood    Burger
5   Car         Gas

我想逐行比较df1["Receiver"]df2["Searchterm"]如果后者甚至部分匹配前者,则将该行的df2["Category"] 分配给df1["Category"]

例如,df2["Searchterm"] 中的“Pizza”部分匹配 df1["Receiver"] 中的“Pizza place”,所以我想将“Fastfood”(这是 df2["Category"] 中的 Pizza 类别)分配给“Pizza place” df1["Category"] 中的类别。

期望的输出是:

df1
Receiver                Category
0   Insurance company   Insurances
1   Shop                Groceries
2   Pizza place         Fastfood
3   Library             
4   Gas station 24/7    Car
5   Something else      
6   Whatever receiver   

那么我怎样才能用正确的类别填写df1["Category"]?谢谢。

【问题讨论】:

    标签: python pandas dataframe string-matching


    【解决方案1】:

    迭代类别

    在类别数量相对于接收者数量较少的假设下,一种策略是迭代类别。使用此解决方案,请注意 last 匹配仅会出现在找到多个类别的位置。

    for tup in df2.itertuples(index=False):
        mask = df1['Receiver'].str.contains(tup.Searchterm, regex=False)
        df1.loc[mask, 'Category'] = tup.Category
    
    print(df1)
    
    #      Category           Receiver
    # 0  Insurances  Insurance company
    # 1   Groceries               Shop
    # 2    Fastfood        Pizza place
    # 3                        Library
    # 4         Car   Gas station 24/7
    # 5                 Something else
    # 6              Whatever receiver
    

    性能基准测试

    如前所述,与df2 中的类别相比,此解决方案与df1 中的行相比更适合扩展。为了说明这一点,请考虑以下不同大小的输入数据帧的性能。

    def jpp(df1, df2):
        for tup in df2.itertuples(index=False):
            df1.loc[df1['Receiver'].str.contains(tup.Searchterm, regex=False), 'Category'] = tup.Category
        return df1
    
    def user347(df1, df2):
        df1['Category'] = df1['Receiver'].replace((df2['Searchterm'] + r'.*').values,
                                                  df2['Category'].values,
                                                  regex=True)
        df1.loc[df1['Receiver'].isin(df1['Category']), 'Category'] = ''
        return df1
    
    df1 = pd.concat([df1]*10**4, ignore_index=True)
    df2 = pd.concat([df2], ignore_index=True)
    
    %timeit jpp(df1, df2)      # 145 ms per loop
    %timeit user347(df1, df2)  # 364 ms per loop
    
    df1 = pd.concat([df1], ignore_index=True)
    df2 = pd.concat([df2]*100, ignore_index=True)
    
    %timeit jpp(df1, df2)      # 666 ms per loop
    %timeit user347(df1, df2)  # 88 ms per loop
    

    【讨论】:

    • 非常感谢,我花了好几个小时尝试了数百行不同的方法,但都没有成功,但最终还是成功了。我试图避免使用数据帧进行循环,但这似乎比熊猫自己的方法简单得多,除非有数千个接收器,否则可能没有任何问题?您能解释一下“仅在找到多个类别的地方匹配最后一个匹配项”的意思吗?
    • @KMFR,第一点,当您拥有更多类别时,该方法会减慢更多;否则应该没问题。第二点,假设您有一个名为“Insurance Shop”的接收器......这将映射到杂货店而不是保险公司......它将按照df2 行顺序映射到第二个匹配项。
    • 好的,谢谢@jpp,我会避免使用过于模糊的搜索词。
    • 也许Series.replace 用于数据量大时的矢量化解决方案?
    • 只是想让你在类别很大时显示性能 - 非常好的更新,感谢你这样做,所以我不必:D
    【解决方案2】:

    您可以将Series.replaceregex 一起用于矢量化方法:

    df1['Category'] = df1['Receiver'].replace(
        (df2['Searchterm'] + r'.*').values,
        df2['Category'].values,
        regex=True
    )
    
    df1.loc[df1['Receiver'].isin(df1['Category']), 'Category'] = ''
    
    print(df1)
    
         Category           Receiver
    0  Insurances  Insurance company
    1   Groceries               Shop
    2    Fastfood        Pizza place
    3                        Library
    4         Car   Gas station 24/7
    5                 Something else
    6              Whatever receiver
    

    请注意,这假定每个Searchterm 字符串都将在每个Receiver 字符串的开头找到。如果不是这样,请相应地调整正则表达式。

    【讨论】:

    • 这确实是一个很好的解决方案,尤其是如果您有大量的类别。我在回答中添加了一些基准来说明。
    【解决方案3】:

    使用 str.extract 的另一种解决方案

    pat = '('+'|'.join(df2['Searchterm'])+')'
    df1["Category"] = df1['Receiver'].str.extract(pat)[0].map(df2.set_index('Searchterm')['Category'].to_dict()).fillna('')
    
        Receiver            Category
    0   Insurance company   Insurances
    1   Shop                Groceries
    2   Pizza place         Fastfood
    3   Library 
    4   Gas station 24/7    Car
    5   Something else  
    6   Whatever receiver   
    

    性能基准测试

    def jpp(df1, df2):
        for tup in df2.itertuples(index=False):
            df1.loc[df1['Receiver'].str.contains(tup.Searchterm, regex=False), 'Category'] = tup.Category
        return df1
    
    def user347(df1, df2):
        df1['Category'] = df1['Receiver'].replace((df2['Searchterm'] + r'.*').values,
                                                  df2['Category'].values,
                                                  regex=True)
        df1.loc[df1['Receiver'].isin(df1['Category']), 'Category'] = ''
        return df1
    
    def vai(df1, df2):
        pat = '('+'|'.join(df2['Searchterm'])+')'
        df1["Category"] = df1['Receiver'].str.extract(pat)[0].map(df2.set_index('Searchterm')['Category'].to_dict()).fillna('')
    
    df1 = pd.concat([df1]*10**4, ignore_index=True)
    df2 = pd.concat([df2], ignore_index=True)
    
    %timeit jpp(df1, df2)    
    %timeit user347(df1, df2)
    %timeit vai(df1, df2)
    
    
    120 ms ± 2.26 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
    221 ms ± 4.74 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
    78.2 ms ± 1.56 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
    
    df1 = pd.concat([df1], ignore_index=True)
    df2 = pd.concat([df2]*100, ignore_index=True)
    
    %timeit jpp(df1, df2)
    %timeit user347(df1, df2)
    %timeit vai(df1, df2)
    
    11.4 s ± 276 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
    20.4 s ± 296 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
    98.3 ms ± 408 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
    

    【讨论】:

    • 非常酷,谢谢!我尝试使用 str.contains(),str.extract() 对我来说是新的。
    • 非常好:)。我不确定结果是否完全具有可比性,因为df2.set_index('Searchterm')['Category'].to_dict() 折叠成一个小容器。同样对于10**5,我看到了性能jpp: 1.52 s per loop; user347: 3.82 s per loop; vai: 1.62 s per loop。所以我们的方法之间有些平衡。
    • 这里的第二个基准是完全没有用的公平。也许将其删除或使用str.extract 找出不同的解决方案?
    猜你喜欢
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 2015-05-23
    • 2022-09-23
    • 1970-01-01
    • 2023-03-30
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    相关资源
    最近更新 更多