【发布时间】:2014-09-19 02:45:16
【问题描述】:
我一直在学习 C,并且有一段时间习惯了 C 中的内存管理。我在了解链表后编写了这个程序:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct node {
int x;
struct node *next;
};
void free_node(struct node *n) {
struct node *p, *next;
for (p = n; p != NULL; p = next) {
next = p->next;
free(p);
}
}
int main(int argc, char const *argv[]) {
int i;
struct node *n, *p, *root = malloc(sizeof(struct node));
root->x = 0;
n = root;
for (i = 1; i <= 5; ++i) {
struct node *next = malloc(sizeof(struct node));
next->x = i;
n->next = next;
n = n->next;
}
n->next = NULL;
// print values
for (p = root; p != NULL; p = p->next) {
printf("%i\n", p->x);
}
free_node(n);
return 0;
}
我读过的大多数教程在解释 C 中的内存管理方面做得很糟糕,甚至根本没有提到它。我希望这段代码会释放所有 malloc 的内存,但是当我运行它时:valgrind --track-origins=yes --leak-check=full ./linked_list Valgrind 告诉我这一点(我省略了消息的第一部分,它并不真正包含信息):
0
1
2
3
4
5
==1366==
==1366== HEAP SUMMARY:
==1366== in use at exit: 29,618 bytes in 381 blocks
==1366== total heap usage: 460 allocs, 79 frees, 35,650 bytes allocated
==1366==
==1366== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 46 of 78
==1366== at 0x6DFB: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/3.9.0/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==1366== by 0x100000E87: main (in ./linked_list)
==1366==
==1366== LEAK SUMMARY:
==1366== definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
==1366== indirectly lost: 64 bytes in 4 blocks
==1366== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==1366== still reachable: 4,096 bytes in 1 blocks
==1366== suppressed: 25,442 bytes in 375 blocks
==1366== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==1366== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==1366==
==1366== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==1366== ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 148 from 49)
我看了,找不到内存泄漏。我很想知道为什么会发生这种情况,以及将来我可以做些什么来防止内存泄漏。谢谢!
【问题讨论】:
标签: c memory-leaks linked-list valgrind free