【问题标题】:How to calculate the difference between two Java java.sql.Timestamps?如何计算两个 Java java.sql.Timestamps 之间的差异?
【发布时间】:2010-10-09 14:20:26
【问题描述】:

请包括纳米,否则将是微不足道的:

long diff = Math.abs(t1.getTime () - t2.getTime ());

[编辑] 我想要最精确的结果,所以没有双打;只有整数/长算法。此外,结果必须是积极的。伪代码:

Timestamp result = abs (t1 - t2);

例子:

t1 = (time=1001, nanos=1000000), t2 = (time=999, nanos=999000000)
 -> diff = (time=2, nanos=2000000)

是的,java.sql.Timestamp 中的毫秒在时间和 nanos par 中重复,因此 1001 毫秒意味着 1 秒 (1000) 和 1 毫秒,在 time 部分和 nanos 部分中,因为 1毫秒 = 1000000 纳秒)。这比看起来要狡猾得多。

我建议不要在没有实际测试代码或准备好工作代码示例的情况下发布答案:)

【问题讨论】:

  • 那么,如果没有人知道,你有一个解决方案吗?
  • 根据 Timestamp 源代码中的 cmets,millis 部分实际上并没有在 nanos 中复制。取而代之的是,直到秒存储在 java.lang.Date 的超类中,并且 nanos 提供所有其余时间。
  • @mmyers:我正在研究一个,但我希望有人有一个可行的例子来拯救我可怜的大脑......但我应该猜到,当谷歌没有打开任何东西时,没有人有t1.getTime()-t2.getTime()
  • @Richard:是的。狡猾的是,他们在内部做正确的事。如果您调用 API,它会将毫秒混合到两个字段中;看看我的单元测试看起来有多奇怪。
  • 该死!这个废话花了我一个小时! =8*O

标签: java timestamp


【解决方案1】:

经过一小时和各种单元测试,我想出了这个解决方案:

public static Timestamp diff (java.util.Date t1, java.util.Date t2)
{
    // Make sure the result is always > 0
    if (t1.compareTo (t2) < 0)
    {
        java.util.Date tmp = t1;
        t1 = t2;
        t2 = tmp;
    }

    // Timestamps mix milli and nanoseconds in the API, so we have to separate the two
    long diffSeconds = (t1.getTime () / 1000) - (t2.getTime () / 1000);
    // For normals dates, we have millisecond precision
    int nano1 = ((int) t1.getTime () % 1000) * 1000000;
    // If the parameter is a Timestamp, we have additional precision in nanoseconds
    if (t1 instanceof Timestamp)
        nano1 = ((Timestamp)t1).getNanos ();
    int nano2 = ((int) t2.getTime () % 1000) * 1000000;
    if (t2 instanceof Timestamp)
        nano2 = ((Timestamp)t2).getNanos ();

    int diffNanos = nano1 - nano2;
    if (diffNanos < 0)
    {
        // Borrow one second
        diffSeconds --;
        diffNanos += 1000000000;
    }

    // mix nanos and millis again
    Timestamp result = new Timestamp ((diffSeconds * 1000) + (diffNanos / 1000000));
    // setNanos() with a value of in the millisecond range doesn't affect the value of the time field
    // while milliseconds in the time field will modify nanos! Damn, this API is a *mess*
    result.setNanos (diffNanos);
    return result;
}

单元测试:

    Timestamp t1 = new Timestamp (0);
    Timestamp t3 = new Timestamp (999);
    Timestamp t4 = new Timestamp (5001);
    // Careful here; internally, Java has set nanos already!
    t4.setNanos (t4.getNanos () + 1);

    // Show what a mess this API is...
    // Yes, the milliseconds show up in *both* fields! Isn't that fun?
    assertEquals (999, t3.getTime ());
    assertEquals (999000000, t3.getNanos ());
    // This looks weird but t4 contains 5 seconds, 1 milli, 1 nano.
    // The lone milli is in both results ...
    assertEquals (5001, t4.getTime ());
    assertEquals (1000001, t4.getNanos ());

    diff = DBUtil.diff (t1, t4);
    assertEquals (5001, diff.getTime ());
    assertEquals (1000001, diff.getNanos ());

    diff = DBUtil.diff (t4, t3);
    assertEquals (4002, diff.getTime ());
    assertEquals (2000001, diff.getNanos ());

【讨论】:

  • 经过多次尝试,我无法让我的代码的 BigInteger 版本比您的代码慢三倍以下。这值得一票。
  • 谢谢 :) BigInt 代码的优点是它是单行代码(并且更容易理解)。这就是我给它 +1 的原因。
【解决方案2】:

我用这个方法来得到两个java.sql.Timestmap之间的区别

/**
 * Get a diff between two timestamps.
 *
 * @param oldTs The older timestamp
 * @param newTs The newer timestamp
 * @param timeUnit The unit in which you want the diff
 * @return The diff value, in the provided time unit.
 */
public static long getDateDiff(Timestamp oldTs, Timestamp newTs, TimeUnit timeUnit) {
    long diffInMS = newTs.getTime() - oldTs.getTime();
    return timeUnit.convert(diffInMS, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
}

// Examples:
// long diffMinutes = getDateDiff(oldTs, newTs, TimeUnit.MINUTES);
// long diffHours = getDateDiff(oldTs, newTs, TimeUnit.HOURS);

【讨论】:

  • 整洁。丢失纳秒,但非常干净且易于理解。
【解决方案3】:

在什么单位?您上面的差异将给出毫秒,Timestamp.nanos() 返回一个 int,它将在(百万分之一?)毫秒。所以你的意思是例如

(t1.getTime () + (.000001*t1.getNanos()) - (t2.getTime () + (.000001*t2.getNanos())

还是我错过了什么?另一个问题是您需要这种级别的精度吗? AFAIK JVM 不能保证在这个级别上是精确的,除非你确定你的数据源是那么精确,否则我认为这并不重要。

【讨论】:

  • 我想要一个确切的结果,拜托。
  • 感谢您的努力;我已经发布了一个确切的解决方案,但是男孩,那个 API 是一个 mess
  • 如果时间戳中有毫秒,你的结果将是错误的加上 1s == 1,000,000,000ns (10^9)。
【解决方案4】:

以 mmyers 代码为基础...

import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.sql.Timestamp;


public class Main
{
    // 1s == 1000ms == 1,000,000us == 1,000,000,000ns (1 billion ns)
    public final static BigInteger ONE_BILLION = new BigInteger ("1000000000");
    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException 
    {
        final Timestamp t1;
        final Timestamp t2;
        final BigInteger firstTime;
        final BigInteger secondTime;
        final BigInteger diffTime;

        t1 = new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis());
        Thread.sleep(20);
        t2 = new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis());

        System.out.println(t1);
        System.out.println(t2);
        firstTime  = BigInteger.valueOf(t1.getTime() / 1000 * 1000).multiply(ONE_BILLION ).add(BigInteger.valueOf(t1.getNanos()));
        secondTime = BigInteger.valueOf(t2.getTime() / 1000 * 1000).multiply(ONE_BILLION ).add(BigInteger.valueOf(t2.getNanos()));
        diffTime   = firstTime.subtract(secondTime);
        System.out.println(firstTime);
        System.out.println(secondTime);
        System.out.println(diffTime);
    }
}

【讨论】:

  • +1:可能不是最快的解决方案,但绝对是最简单的代码。不过,请尝试使用我的单元测试运行代码。我认为一旦 nanos % 1000000 != 0 就会搞砸毫秒。
  • 性能提示:运行时间大约是我的解决方案的三倍,但大约是编码时间的 1/6。
【解决方案5】:

(删除旧代码以缩短答案)

编辑 2: 新代码:

public class ArraySizeTest {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
        Timestamp t1 = new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis());
        t1.setNanos(t1.getNanos() + 60);
        Thread.sleep(20);
        Timestamp t2 = new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis());
        t2.setNanos(t2.getNanos() + 30);
        System.out.println(t1);
        System.out.println(t2);
        // The actual diff...
        long firstTime = (getTimeNoMillis(t1) * 1000000) + t1.getNanos();
        long secondTime = (getTimeNoMillis(t2) * 1000000) + t2.getNanos();
        long diff = Math.abs(firstTime - secondTime); // diff is in nanos
        System.out.println(diff);
        System.out.println(Math.abs(t1.getTime() - t2.getTime()));
    }
    private static long getTimeNoMillis(Timestamp t) {
        return t.getTime() - (t.getNanos()/1000000);
    }
}

输出:

2009-02-24 10:35:15.56500006
2009-02-24 10:35:15.59600003
30999970
31

编辑 3:如果您更喜欢返回时间戳的内容,请使用:

public static Timestamp diff(Timestamp t1, Timestamp t2) {
    long firstTime = (getTimeNoMillis(t1) * 1000000) + t1.getNanos();
    long secondTime = (getTimeNoMillis(t2) * 1000000) + t2.getNanos();
    long diff = Math.abs(firstTime - secondTime); // diff is in nanoseconds
    Timestamp ret = new Timestamp(diff / 1000000);
    ret.setNanos((int) (diff % 1000000000));
    return ret;
}
private static long getTimeNoMillis(Timestamp t) {
    return t.getTime() - (t.getNanos()/1000000);
}

此代码通过了您的单元测试。

【讨论】:

  • 要转换为纳秒,您需要乘以 1000000。问题是您是否会在某个时候遇到长时间溢出。
  • @Richard:是的,是的,看起来。
  • @mmyers: 这样的事情应该更简单...... ;) 看看我的解决方案。
  • 嗯,很简单。什么看起来很复杂?
  • @SteveB:这只是变得更好;)
猜你喜欢
  • 2017-04-25
  • 2010-10-29
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2011-05-21
  • 1970-01-01
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2017-03-26
  • 1970-01-01
相关资源
最近更新 更多