【发布时间】:2017-07-05 19:15:52
【问题描述】:
【问题讨论】:
标签: python matplotlib graph scale
【问题讨论】:
标签: python matplotlib graph scale
您可以创建自己的 ScaleBase 类来执行此操作。为了您的目的,我已经修改了 here 中的示例(它制作了平方比例,而不是平方根比例)。另请参阅文档here。
请注意,要正确执行此操作,您可能还应该创建自己的自定义刻度定位器;不过,我还没有在这里这样做;我只是使用ax.set_yticks() 手动设置主要和次要刻度。
import matplotlib.scale as mscale
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.transforms as mtransforms
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
import numpy as np
class SquareRootScale(mscale.ScaleBase):
"""
ScaleBase class for generating square root scale.
"""
name = 'squareroot'
def __init__(self, axis, **kwargs):
# note in older versions of matplotlib (<3.1), this worked fine.
# mscale.ScaleBase.__init__(self)
# In newer versions (>=3.1), you also need to pass in `axis` as an arg
mscale.ScaleBase.__init__(self, axis)
def set_default_locators_and_formatters(self, axis):
axis.set_major_locator(ticker.AutoLocator())
axis.set_major_formatter(ticker.ScalarFormatter())
axis.set_minor_locator(ticker.NullLocator())
axis.set_minor_formatter(ticker.NullFormatter())
def limit_range_for_scale(self, vmin, vmax, minpos):
return max(0., vmin), vmax
class SquareRootTransform(mtransforms.Transform):
input_dims = 1
output_dims = 1
is_separable = True
def transform_non_affine(self, a):
return np.array(a)**0.5
def inverted(self):
return SquareRootScale.InvertedSquareRootTransform()
class InvertedSquareRootTransform(mtransforms.Transform):
input_dims = 1
output_dims = 1
is_separable = True
def transform(self, a):
return np.array(a)**2
def inverted(self):
return SquareRootScale.SquareRootTransform()
def get_transform(self):
return self.SquareRootTransform()
mscale.register_scale(SquareRootScale)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1)
ax.plot(np.arange(0, 9)**2, label='$y=x^2$')
ax.legend()
ax.set_yscale('squareroot')
ax.set_yticks(np.arange(0,9,2)**2)
ax.set_yticks(np.arange(0,8.5,0.5)**2, minor=True)
plt.show()
【讨论】:
这是旧的,但我做了一个快速修复,因为我不想费心创建自定义刻度定位器。如果您要使用自定义比例制作很多地块,那可能是要走的路。只需按照您想要的比例绘制函数,然后如果您只需要一两个绘图,设置刻度和更改标签会更快。
Nx = 100
x = np.linspace(0,50,Nx)
y = np.sqrt(x)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1)
plt.plot(np.sqrt(x), y)
ax.set_xticks([np.sqrt(x[i]) for i in range(0, Nx, Nx // 10)])
ax.set_xticklabels([str(round(x[i],0))[:-2] for i in range(0, Nx, Nx // 10)])
plt.xlabel('x')
plt.ylabel(r'y = $\sqrt{x}$')
plt.grid()
plt.show()
产生情节
【讨论】:
我喜欢 lolopop 的评论和 tom 的回答,更快速和肮脏的解决方案是使用set_yticks and set_yticklabels,如下所示:
x = np.arange(2, 15, 2)
y = x * x
fig = plt.figure()
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(121)
ax2 = fig.add_subplot(122)
ax1.plot(x,y)
ax2.plot(x, np.sqrt(y))
ax2.set_yticks([2,4,6,8,10,12,14])
ax2.set_yticklabels(['4','16','36','64','100','144','196'])
【讨论】:
Matplotlib 现在提供了 powlaw 规范。因此将功率设置为 0.5 应该可以解决问题!
还有他们的例子:
"""
Demonstration of using norm to map colormaps onto data in non-linear ways.
"""
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.colors as colors
from matplotlib.mlab import bivariate_normal
N = 100
X, Y = np.mgrid[-3:3:complex(0, N), -2:2:complex(0, N)]
'''
PowerNorm: Here a power-law trend in X partially obscures a rectified
sine wave in Y. We can remove gamma to 0.5 should do the trick using PowerNorm.
'''
X, Y = np.mgrid[0:3:complex(0, N), 0:2:complex(0, N)]
Z1 = (1 + np.sin(Y * 10.)) * X**(2.)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(2, 1)
pcm = ax[0].pcolormesh(X, Y, Z1, norm=colors.PowerNorm(gamma=1./2.),
cmap='PuBu_r')
fig.colorbar(pcm, ax=ax[0], extend='max')
pcm = ax[1].pcolormesh(X, Y, Z1, cmap='PuBu_r')
fig.colorbar(pcm, ax=ax[1], extend='max')
fig.show()
【讨论】:
这是绘制的简单方法
import numpy as np
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
plt.rcParams["figure.dpi"] = 140
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.spines["left"].set_position("zero")
ax.spines["bottom"].set_position("zero")
ax.spines["right"].set_color("none")
ax.spines["top"].set_color("none")
ax.xaxis.set_ticks_position("bottom")
ax.yaxis.set_ticks_position("left")
origin = [0, 0]
# 45
plt.plot(
np.linspace(0, 1, 1000),
np.sqrt(np.linspace(0, 1, 1000)),
color="k",
)
ax.set_aspect("equal")
plt.xlim(-0.25, 1)
plt.ylim(0, 1)
plt.yticks(ticks=np.linspace(0, 1, 6))
plt.show()
【讨论】: