获取1s 索引,比如idx,然后用它索引a,获取max 索引,最后通过索引idx 将其追溯到原始顺序-
idx = np.flatnonzero(label==1)
out = idx[a[idx].argmax()]
示例运行 -
# Assuming inputs to be 1D
In [18]: a
Out[18]: array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1])
In [19]: label
Out[19]: array([1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1])
In [20]: idx = np.flatnonzero(label==1)
In [21]: idx[a[idx].argmax()]
Out[21]: 5
对于作为整数的a 和作为0s 和1s 的数组的label,我们可以进一步优化,因为我们可以根据其中的值范围缩放a,就像这样-
(label*(a.max()-a.min()+1) + a).argmax()
此外,如果a 只有正数,它会简化为 -
(label*(a.max()+1) + a).argmax()
正整数的时序较大a -
In [115]: np.random.seed(0)
...: a = np.random.randint(0,10,(100000))
...: label = np.random.randint(0,2,(100000))
In [117]: %%timeit
...: idx = np.flatnonzero(label==1)
...: out = idx[a[idx].argmax()]
1000 loops, best of 3: 592 µs per loop
In [116]: %timeit (label*(a.max()-a.min()+1) + a).argmax()
1000 loops, best of 3: 357 µs per loop
# @coldspeed's soln
In [120]: %timeit np.ma.masked_where(~label.astype(bool), a).argmax()
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.63 ms per loop
# won't work with negative numbers in a
In [119]: %timeit (label*(a.max()+1) + a).argmax()
1000 loops, best of 3: 292 µs per loop
# @klim's soln (won't work with negative numbers in a)
In [121]: %timeit np.argmax(a * (label == 1))
1000 loops, best of 3: 229 µs per loop