【发布时间】:2015-08-09 21:11:57
【问题描述】:
假设我有一个 1d numpy 数组,其中包含一些嘈杂的数据系列。
我想建立一个阈值来检查值什么时候是high,什么时候是low。 然而,因为数据是嘈杂的,只做是没有意义的
is_high = data > threshold
我试图设置此阈值的容差,就像许多控制系统(例如大多数供暖和空调系统)所做的那样。这个想法是,信号的状态只有在超过阈值加上容差时才会从低变为高。同样,只有在低于阈值减去容差时,信号才会从高变为低。换句话说:
def tolerance_filter(data, threshold, tolerance):
currently_high = False # start low
signal_state = np.empty_like(data, dtype=np.bool)
for i in range(data.size):
# if we were high and we are getting too low, become low
if currently_high and data[i] < (threshold-tolerance):
currently_high = False
# if we were low and are getting too high, become high
elif not currently_high and data[i] > (threshold+tolerance):
currently_high = True
signal_state[i] = currently_high
return signal_state
这个函数给出了我期望的输出。但是,我想知道是否有任何方法可以使用 numpy 或 scipy 的速度而不是原始 python for 循环来做到这一点。
有什么想法吗? :)
更新:
感谢 Joe Kington 的评论指出了 滞后 术语,我找到了this other SO 问题。恐怕它很相似(重复?),还有 Bas Swinckels 的one nice working solution。
无论如何,我尝试实现 Joe Kington 建议的加速(不知道我是否做对了),并将他的解决方案、Fergal 和 Bas 的解决方案与我的幼稚方法进行了比较。结果如下(代码如下):
Proposed function in my original question
10 loops, best of 3: 22.6 ms per loop
Proposed function by Fergal
1000 loops, best of 3: 995 µs per loop
Proposed function by Bas Swinckels in the hysteresis question
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.05 ms per loop
Proposed function by Joe Kington using Cython
Approximate time cost of compiling: 2.195411
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.35 ms per loop
答案中的所有方法都执行相似(尽管 Fergal 需要一些额外的步骤来获得布尔向量!)。有没有考虑在这里添加?
此外,我很惊讶Cython 方法速度较慢(不过只是稍微慢了一点)。无论如何,我不得不承认,如果您不熟悉所有 numpy 函数,它可能是最快的编码方法......
这是我用来对不同选项进行基准测试的代码。非常欢迎审核和修订! :P (Cython 代码在中间强制 SO 将所有代码保留在同一个可滚动块中。当然我把它放在不同的文件中)
# Naive approach from the original question
def tolerance_filter1(data, threshold, tolerance):
currently_high = False # start low
signal_state = np.empty_like(data, dtype=np.bool)
for i in range(data.size):
# if we were high and we are getting too low, become low
if currently_high and data[i] < (threshold-tolerance):
currently_high = False
# if we were low and are getting too high, become high
elif not currently_high and data[i] > (threshold+tolerance):
currently_high = True
signal_state[i] = currently_high
return signal_state
# Numpythonic approach suggested by Fergal
def tolerance_filter2(data, threshold, tolerance):
a = np.zeros_like(data)
a[ data < threshold-tolerance] = -1
a[ data > threshold+tolerance] = +1
wh = np.where(a != 0)[0]
idx= np.diff( a[wh]) == 2
#This variable indexes the values of data where data crosses
#from below threshold-tol to above threshold+tol
crossesAboveThreshold = wh[idx]
return crossesAboveThreshold
# Approach suggested by Bas Swinckels and borrowed
# from the hysteresis question
def tolerance_filter3(data, threshold, tolerance, initial=False):
hi = data >= threshold+tolerance
lo_or_hi = (data <= threshold-tolerance) | hi
ind = np.nonzero(lo_or_hi)[0]
if not ind.size: # prevent index error if ind is empty
return np.zeros_like(x, dtype=bool) | initial
cnt = np.cumsum(lo_or_hi) # from 0 to len(x)
return np.where(cnt, hi[ind[cnt-1]], initial)
#########################################################
## IN A DIFFERENT FILE (tolerance_filter_cython.pyx)
## So that StackOverflow shows a single scrollable code block :)
import numpy as np
import cython
@cython.boundscheck(False)
def tolerance_filter(data, float threshold, float tolerance):
cdef bint currently_high = 0 # start low
signal_state = np.empty_like(data, dtype=int)
cdef double[:] data_view = data
cdef long[:] signal_state_view = signal_state
cdef int i = 0
cdef int l = len(data)
low = np.empty_like(data, dtype=bool)
high = np.empty_like(data, dtype=bool)
low = data < (threshold-tolerance)
high = data > (threshold+tolerance)
for i in range(l):
# if we were high and we are getting too low, become low
if currently_high and low[i]:
currently_high = False
# if we were low and are getting too high, become high
elif not currently_high and high[i]:
currently_high = True
signal_state_view[i] = currently_high
return signal_state
##################################################################
# BACK TO THE PYTHON FILE
import numpy as np
from time import clock
from datetime import datetime
from IPython import get_ipython
ipython = get_ipython()
time = np.arange(0,1000,0.01)
data = np.sin(time*3) + np.cos(time/7)*8 + np.random.normal(size=time.shape)*2
threshold, tolerance = 0, 4
print "Proposed function in my original question"
ipython.magic("timeit tolerance_filter1(data, threshold, tolerance)")
print "\nProposed function by Fergal"
ipython.magic("timeit tolerance_filter2(data, threshold, tolerance)")
print "\nProposed function by Bas Swinckels in the hysteresis question"
ipython.magic("timeit tolerance_filter3(data, threshold, tolerance)")
print "\nProposed function by Joe Kington using Cython"
start = datetime.now()
import pyximport; pyximport.install()
import tolerance_filter_cython
print "Approximate time cost of compiling: {}".format((datetime.now()-start).total_seconds())
tolerance_filter4 = tolerance_filter_cython.tolerance_filter
ipython.magic("timeit tolerance_filter4(data, threshold, tolerance)")
【问题讨论】:
-
你说的是hysteresis的某种形式吗?
-
是的,滞后,就是这样!谢谢,你知道了! :P