【发布时间】:2015-09-06 13:57:21
【问题描述】:
所以使用Matching 包(Link to package here)
我们可以通过修改后的GenMatch 示例来工作。
library(Matching)
data(lalonde)
#introduce an id vaiable
lalonde$ID <- 1:length(lalonde$age)
X = cbind(lalonde$age, lalonde$educ, lalonde$black, lalonde$hisp,
lalonde$married, lalonde$nodegr, lalonde$u74, lalonde$u75,
lalonde$re75, lalonde$re74)
BalanceMat <- cbind(lalonde$age, lalonde$educ, lalonde$black,
lalonde$hisp, lalonde$married, lalonde$nodegr,
lalonde$u74, lalonde$u75, lalonde$re75, lalonde$re74,
I(lalonde$re74*lalonde$re75))
genout <- GenMatch(Tr=lalonde$treat, X=X, BalanceMatrix=BalanceMat, estimand="ATE",
pop.size=16, max.generations=10, wait.generations=1)
mout <- Match(Y=NULL, Tr=lalonde$treat, X=X,
Weight.matrix=genout,
replace=TRUE, ties=FALSE)
# here we set ties FALSE so we only have 1-1 Matching
summary(mout)
#now lets create our "Matched dataset"
treated <- lalonde[mout$index.treated,]
# and introduce an indetity variable for each pair
treated$Pair_ID <- treated$ID
non.treated <- lalonde[mout$index.control,]
non.treated$Pair_ID <- treated$ID
matched.data <- rbind(treated, non.treated)
matched.data <- matched.data[order(matched.data$Pair_ID),]
#this outputs which of the non-treated ID was paired with the first person
matched.data$ID[matched.data$Pair_ID==1 & matched.data$treat==0]
我们看到对于数据,ID=1 与 ID=193 匹配
现在让我们在数据的顺序中引入一些随机化,看看我们是否得到相同的对
n <- 500
P1 <- rep(NA, n)
P2 <- rep(NA, n)
P3 <- rep(NA, n)
P4 <- rep(NA, n)
P5 <- rep(NA, n)
P6 <- rep(NA, n)
P7 <- rep(NA, n)
for (i in 1:n) {
lalonde <- lalonde[sample(1:nrow(lalonde)), ] # randomise order
genout <- GenMatch(Tr=lalonde$treat, X=X, BalanceMatrix=BalanceMat, estimand="ATE",
pop.size=16, max.generations=10, wait.generations=1)
mout <- Match(Y=NULL, Tr=lalonde$treat, X=X,
Weight.matrix=genout,
replace=TRUE, ties=FALSE)
summary(mout)
treated <- lalonde[mout$index.treated,]
treated$Pair_ID <- treated$ID
non.treated <- lalonde[mout$index.control,]
non.treated$Pair_ID <- treated$ID
matched.data <- rbind(treated, non.treated)
matched.data <- matched.data[order(matched.data$Pair_ID),]
P1[i] <- matched.data$ID[matched.data$Pair_ID==1 & matched.data$treat==0]
P2[i] <- matched.data$ID[matched.data$Pair_ID==2 & matched.data$treat==0]
P3[i] <- matched.data$ID[matched.data$Pair_ID==3 & matched.data$treat==0]
P4[i] <- matched.data$ID[matched.data$Pair_ID==4 & matched.data$treat==0]
P5[i] <- matched.data$ID[matched.data$Pair_ID==5 & matched.data$treat==0]
P6[i] <- matched.data$ID[matched.data$Pair_ID==6 & matched.data$treat==0]
P7[i] <- matched.data$ID[matched.data$Pair_ID==7 & matched.data$treat==0]
}
因此,loop 将匹配对 500 次,P1 将每次保存 treat==0 的情况。
然后我们看看哪个P1出现得最多,通过:
plot(1:n, P1, main="P1")
或
summary(as.factor(P1))
我们看到没有一个treat==0 案例通常是配对的。
我希望有一个案例(可能 = 193??)通常配对,不依赖于数据的顺序。因此我认为我的循环是错误的。谁能指出在哪里?或者当他们运行一个循环时,他们发现,独立于数据的顺序,相似的情况是成对的??
【问题讨论】:
-
我不确定
GenMatch是否需要被调用到循环中,如果移除,模拟时间会显着减少