【发布时间】:2016-11-18 13:19:19
【问题描述】:
我使用 pandas 读取非常大的 csv 文件,这些文件也是 gzip 压缩的。 我解压缩成大约 30-50GB 的 csv 文件。 我将文件分块并处理/操作它们。 最后将相关数据添加到我压缩的 HDF5 文件中
它工作得很好,但速度很慢,因为我每天必须处理一个文件并且有几年的数据(600TB 未压缩的 csv)
购买更多的内存是避免分块和加快进程(例如 64GB/128GB)的好方法吗? 但这会让 pandas 变得又慢又笨重吗? 我是否正确地说切换到 C++ 可以加快这个过程,但我仍然受到读取过程的影响,并且不得不分块处理数据。 最后,有没有人对处理这个问题的最佳方法有任何想法。
顺便说一句,一旦工作完成,我就不必返回并再次处理数据,所以只想让它在合理的时间内工作,所以写一些并行过程可能很好但经验有限的东西我需要一些时间来构建它,所以除非这是唯一的选择,否则我宁愿不要。
更新。我认为查看代码会更容易。无论如何,我不相信代码特别慢。我认为技术/方法可能是。
def txttohdf(path, contract):
#create dataframes for trade and quote
dftrade = pd.DataFrame(columns = ["datetime", "Price", "Volume"])
dfquote = pd.DataFrame(columns = ["datetime", "BidPrice", "BidSize","AskPrice", "AskSize"])
#create an hdf5 file with high compression and table so we can append
hdf = pd.HDFStore(path + contract + '.h5', complevel=9, complib='blosc')
hdf.put('trade', dftrade, format='table', data_columns=True)
hdf.put('quote', dfquote, format='table', data_columns=True)
#date1 = date(start).strftime('%Y%m%d')
#date2 = date(end).strftime('%Y%m%d')
#dd = [date1 + timedelta(days=x) for x in range((date2-date1).days + 1)]
#walkthrough directories
for subdir, dir, files in os.walk(path):
for file in files:
#check if contract has name
#print(file)
#create filename from directory and file
filename = os.path.join(subdir, file)
#read in csv
if filename.endswith('.gz'):
df = pd.read_csv(gzip.open(filename),header=0,iterator=True,chunksize = 10000, low_memory =False, names = ['RIC','Date','Time','GMTOffset','Type','ExCntrbID','LOC','Price','Volume','MarketVWAP','BuyerID','BidPrice','BidSize','NoBuyers','SellerID','AskPrice','AskSize','NoSellers','Qualifiers','SeqNo','ExchTime','BlockTrd','FloorTrd','PERatio','Yield','NewPrice','NewVol','NewSeqNo','BidYld','AskYld','ISMABidYld','ISMAAskYld','Duration','ModDurtn','BPV','AccInt','Convexity','BenchSpd','SwpSpd','AsstSwpSpd','SwapPoint','BasePrice','UpLimPrice','LoLimPrice','TheoPrice','StockPrice','ConvParity','Premium','BidImpVol','AskImpVol','ImpVol','PrimAct','SecAct','GenVal1','GenVal2','GenVal3','GenVal4','GenVal5','Crack','Top','FreightPr','1MnPft','3MnPft','PrYrPft','1YrPft','3YrPft','5YrPft','10YrPft','Repurch','Offer','Kest','CapGain','Actual','Prior','Revised','Forecast','FrcstHigh','FrcstLow','NoFrcts','TrdQteDate','QuoteTime','BidTic','TickDir','DivCode','AdjClose','PrcTTEFlag','IrgTTEFlag','PrcSubMktId','IrgSubMktId','FinStatus','DivExDate','DivPayDate','DivAmt','Open','High','Low','Last','OpenYld','HighYld','LowYld','ShortPrice','ShortVol','ShortTrdVol','ShortTurnnover','ShortWeighting','ShortLimit','AccVolume','Turnover','ImputedCls','ChangeType','OldValue','NewValue','Volatility','Strike','Premium','AucPrice','Auc Vol','MidPrice','FinEvalPrice','ProvEvalPrice','AdvancingIssues','DecliningIssues','UnchangedIssues','TotalIssues','AdvancingVolume','DecliningVolume','UnchangedVolume','TotalVolume','NewHighs','NewLows','TotalMoves','PercentageChange','AdvancingMoves','DecliningMoves','UnchangedMoves','StrongMarket','WeakMarket','ChangedMarket','MarketVolatility','OriginalDate','LoanAskVolume','LoanAskAmountTradingPrice','PercentageShortVolumeTradedVolume','PercentageShortPriceTradedPrice','ForecastNAV','PreviousDaysNAV','FinalNAV','30DayATMIVCall','60DayATMIVCall','90DayATMIVCall','30DayATMIVPut','60DayATMIVPut','90DayATMIVPut','BackgroundReference','DataSource','BidSpread','AskSpread','ContractPhysicalUnits','Miniumumquantity','NumberPhysicals','ClosingReferencePrice','ImbalanceQuantity','FarClearingPrice','NearClearingPrice','OptionAdjustedSpread','ZSpread','ConvexityPremium','ConvexityRatio','PercentageDailyReturn','InterpolatedCDSBasis','InterpolatedCDSSpread','ClosesttoMaturityCDSBasis','SettlementDate','EquityPrice','Parity','CreditSpread','Delta','InputVolatility','ImpliedVolatility','FairPrice','BondFloor','Edge','YTW','YTB','SimpleMargin','DiscountMargin','12MonthsEPS','UpperTradingLimit','LowerTradingLimit','AmountOutstanding','IssuePrice','GSpread','MiscValue','MiscValueDescription'])
#parse date time this is quicker than doing it while we read it in
for chunk in df:
chunk['datetime'] = chunk.apply(lambda row: datetime.datetime.strptime(row['Date']+ ':' + row['Time'],'%d-%b-%Y:%H:%M:%S.%f'), axis=1)
#df = df[~df.comment.str.contains('ALIAS')]
#drop uneeded columns inc date and time
chunk = chunk.drop(['Date','Time','GMTOffset','ExCntrbID','LOC','MarketVWAP','BuyerID','NoBuyers','SellerID','NoSellers','Qualifiers','SeqNo','ExchTime','BlockTrd','FloorTrd','PERatio','Yield','NewPrice','NewVol','NewSeqNo','BidYld','AskYld','ISMABidYld','ISMAAskYld','Duration','ModDurtn','BPV','AccInt','Convexity','BenchSpd','SwpSpd','AsstSwpSpd','SwapPoint','BasePrice','UpLimPrice','LoLimPrice','TheoPrice','StockPrice','ConvParity','Premium','BidImpVol','AskImpVol','ImpVol','PrimAct','SecAct','GenVal1','GenVal2','GenVal3','GenVal4','GenVal5','Crack','Top','FreightPr','1MnPft','3MnPft','PrYrPft','1YrPft','3YrPft','5YrPft','10YrPft','Repurch','Offer','Kest','CapGain','Actual','Prior','Revised','Forecast','FrcstHigh','FrcstLow','NoFrcts','TrdQteDate','QuoteTime','BidTic','TickDir','DivCode','AdjClose','PrcTTEFlag','IrgTTEFlag','PrcSubMktId','IrgSubMktId','FinStatus','DivExDate','DivPayDate','DivAmt','Open','High','Low','Last','OpenYld','HighYld','LowYld','ShortPrice','ShortVol','ShortTrdVol','ShortTurnnover','ShortWeighting','ShortLimit','AccVolume','Turnover','ImputedCls','ChangeType','OldValue','NewValue','Volatility','Strike','Premium','AucPrice','Auc Vol','MidPrice','FinEvalPrice','ProvEvalPrice','AdvancingIssues','DecliningIssues','UnchangedIssues','TotalIssues','AdvancingVolume','DecliningVolume','UnchangedVolume','TotalVolume','NewHighs','NewLows','TotalMoves','PercentageChange','AdvancingMoves','DecliningMoves','UnchangedMoves','StrongMarket','WeakMarket','ChangedMarket','MarketVolatility','OriginalDate','LoanAskVolume','LoanAskAmountTradingPrice','PercentageShortVolumeTradedVolume','PercentageShortPriceTradedPrice','ForecastNAV','PreviousDaysNAV','FinalNAV','30DayATMIVCall','60DayATMIVCall','90DayATMIVCall','30DayATMIVPut','60DayATMIVPut','90DayATMIVPut','BackgroundReference','DataSource','BidSpread','AskSpread','ContractPhysicalUnits','Miniumumquantity','NumberPhysicals','ClosingReferencePrice','ImbalanceQuantity','FarClearingPrice','NearClearingPrice','OptionAdjustedSpread','ZSpread','ConvexityPremium','ConvexityRatio','PercentageDailyReturn','InterpolatedCDSBasis','InterpolatedCDSSpread','ClosesttoMaturityCDSBasis','SettlementDate','EquityPrice','Parity','CreditSpread','Delta','InputVolatility','ImpliedVolatility','FairPrice','BondFloor','Edge','YTW','YTB','SimpleMargin','DiscountMargin','12MonthsEPS','UpperTradingLimit','LowerTradingLimit','AmountOutstanding','IssuePrice','GSpread','MiscValue','MiscValueDescription'], axis=1)
# convert to datetime explicitly and add nanoseconds to same time stamps
chunk['datetime'] = pd.to_datetime(chunk.datetime)
#nanoseconds = df.groupby(['datetime']).cumcount()
#df['datetime'] += np.array(nanoseconds, dtype='m8[ns]')
# drop empty prints and make sure all prices are valid
dfRic = chunk[(chunk["RIC"] == contract)]
if len(dfRic)>0:
print(dfRic)
if ~chunk.empty:
dft = dfRic[(dfRic["Type"] == "Trade")]
dft.dropna(subset = ["Volume"], inplace =True)
dft = dft.drop(["RIC","Type","BidPrice", "BidSize", "AskPrice", "AskSize"], axis=1)
dft = dft[(dft["Price"] > 0)]
# clean up bid and ask
dfq = dfRic[(dfRic["Type"] == "Quote")]
dfq.dropna(how = 'all', subset = ["BidSize","AskSize"], inplace =True)
dfq = dfq.drop(["RIC","Type","Price", "Volume"], axis=1)
dfq = dfq[(dfq["BidSize"] > 0) | (dfq["AskSize"] > 0)]
dfq = dfq.ffill()
else:
print("Empty")
#add to hdf and close if loop finished
hdf.append('trade', dft, format='table', data_columns=True)
hdf.append('quote', dfq, format='table', data_columns=True)
hdf.close()
【问题讨论】:
-
你能解释一下什么是慢,为什么它是慢的?如果没有更多细节,很难猜测什么会有助于加快这一进程。
-
您应该尝试分析和测量程序的性能,以确定哪些点是最慢的,以及内存或 CPU 功率是否是限制因素。这将帮助您缩小可以帮助您的特定更改的范围。然后,您还可以将源代码中最慢的部分上传到codereview.stackexchange.com 上的问题中,并寻求有关提高其性能的建议。
-
我会尝试分块读取压缩后的 CSV,而不是先解压缩它们——这样你应该有更少的 IO(通常是最慢的部分之一)。除此之外,拥有更多 RAM 应该可以让你拥有更大的块,或者如果你的 RAM 大约是与生成的 DF 相比,大两倍。由于开销,同一台服务器/计算机上的并行处理(如果您的意思是 DASK)会使一切变得更糟。如果您需要真正的强大功能,请查看 Apache PySpark SQL,但这意味着对 Hadoop 集群的投资更高——只需我的 2 美分……
-
您好,贴出代码是为了给您一个更好的主意。我很确定是阅读和分块部分很耗时。
-
我认为在创建数据帧时使用多处理和指定数据类型会减少时间。
标签: python csv pandas ram chunking