【发布时间】:2016-12-04 16:06:27
【问题描述】:
我希望运行总共 nAnalysis=25 个 Abaqus 模型,每个模型使用 X 个核心,并且我可以同时运行 nParallelLoops= 5 个这些模型。如果当前 5 个分析中的一个完成,则应开始另一个分析,直到所有 nAnalysis 完成。
我根据1和2中发布的解决方案实现了以下代码。但是,我遗漏了一些东西,因为所有 nAnalysis 都尝试从“一次”开始,代码死锁并且没有分析完成,因为许多人可能想要使用相同的核心比已经开始的分析正在使用。
- Using Python's Multiprocessing module to execute simultaneous and separate SEAWAT/MODFLOW model runs
- How to parallelize this nested loop in Python that calls Abaqus
def runABQfile(*args):
import subprocess
import os
inpFile,path,jobVars = args
prcStr1 = (path+'/runJob.sh')
process = subprocess.check_call(prcStr1, stdin=None, stdout=None, stderr=None, shell=True, cwd=path)
def safeABQrun(*args):
import os
try:
runABQfile(*args)
except Exception as e:
print("Tread Error: %s runABQfile(*%r)" % (e, args))
def errFunction(ppos, *args):
import os
from concurrent.futures import ProcessPoolExecutor
from concurrent.futures import as_completed
from concurrent.futures import wait
with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=nParallelLoops) as executor:
future_to_file = dict((executor.submit(safeABQrun, inpFiles[k], aPath[k], jobVars), k) for k in range(0,nAnalysis)) # 5Nodes
wait(future_to_file,timeout=None,return_when='ALL_COMPLETED')
到目前为止,我能够运行的唯一方法是,如果我修改 errFunction 以当时正好使用 5 次分析,如下所示。但是,这种方法有时会导致其中一个分析花费的时间比每组中的其他 4 个(每个ProcessPoolExecutor 调用)要长得多,因此尽管有资源(核心)可用,下一组 5 个也不会开始。最终,这会导致完成所有 25 个模型的时间更长。
def errFunction(ppos, *args):
import os
from concurrent.futures import ProcessPoolExecutor
from concurrent.futures import as_completed
from concurrent.futures import wait
# Group 1
with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=nParallelLoops) as executor:
future_to_file = dict((executor.submit(safeABQrun, inpFiles[k], aPath[k], jobVars), k) for k in range(0,5)) # 5Nodes
wait(future_to_file,timeout=None,return_when='ALL_COMPLETED')
# Group 2
with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=nParallelLoops) as executor:
future_to_file = dict((executor.submit(safeABQrun, inpFiles[k], aPath[k], jobVars), k) for k in range(5,10)) # 5Nodes
wait(future_to_file,timeout=None,return_when='ALL_COMPLETED')
# Group 3
with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=nParallelLoops) as executor:
future_to_file = dict((executor.submit(safeABQrun, inpFiles[k], aPath[k], jobVars), k) for k in range(10,15)) # 5Nodes
wait(future_to_file,timeout=None,return_when='ALL_COMPLETED')
# Group 4
with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=nParallelLoops) as executor:
future_to_file = dict((executor.submit(safeABQrun, inpFiles[k], aPath[k], jobVars), k) for k in range(15,20)) # 5Nodes
wait(future_to_file,timeout=None,return_when='ALL_COMPLETED')
# Group 5
with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=nParallelLoops) as executor:
future_to_file = dict((executor.submit(safeABQrun, inpFiles[k], aPath[k], jobVars), k) for k in range(20,25)) # 5Nodes
wait(future_to_file,timeout=None,return_when='ALL_COMPLETED')
我尝试使用as_completed 函数,但它似乎也不起作用。
请您帮忙找出正确的并行化,以便我可以运行 nAnalysis,始终使用 nParallelLoops同时运行? 感谢您的帮助。 我正在使用 Python 2.7
最好的, 大卫·P。
2016 年 7 月 30 日更新:
我在 safeABQrun 中引入了一个循环,它管理 5 个不同的“队列”。该循环是必要的,以避免分析试图在一个节点中运行而另一个节点仍在运行的情况。在开始任何实际分析之前,分析已预先配置为在请求的节点之一中运行。
def safeABQrun(*list_args):
import os
inpFiles,paths,jobVars = list_args
nA = len(inpFiles)
for k in range(0,nA):
args = (inpFiles[k],paths[k],jobVars[k])
try:
runABQfile(*args) # Actual Run Function
except Exception as e:
print("Tread Error: %s runABQfile(*%r)" % (e, args))
def errFunction(ppos, *args):
with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=nParallelLoops) as executor:
futures = dict((executor.submit(safeABQrun, inpF, aPth, jVrs), k) for inpF, aPth, jVrs, k in list_args) # 5Nodes
for f in as_completed(futures):
print("|=== Finish Process Train %d ===|" % futures[f])
if f.exception() is not None:
print('%r generated an exception: %s' % (futures[f], f.exception()))
【问题讨论】:
标签: python multiprocessing python-multiprocessing concurrent.futures abaqus