【发布时间】:2021-01-18 03:26:49
【问题描述】:
我有以下 ICommand 实现,效果很好,但我想扩展它以便可以传递外部 canExecute 参数
public class AsyncRelayCommand : ICommand
{
private readonly Func<object, Task> callback;
private readonly Action<Exception> onException;
private bool isExecuting;
public bool IsExecuting
{
get => isExecuting;
set
{
isExecuting = value;
CanExecuteChanged?.Invoke(this, new EventArgs());
}
}
public event EventHandler CanExecuteChanged;
public AsyncRelayCommand(Func<object, Task> callback, Action<Exception> onException = null)
{
this.callback = callback;
this.onException = onException;
}
public bool CanExecute(object parameter) => !IsExecuting;
public async void Execute(object parameter)
{
IsExecuting = true;
try
{
await callback(parameter);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
onException?.Invoke(e);
}
IsExecuting = false;
}
}
能否以某种方式扩展此实现,以便当调用者的 CanExecute() 更改时,Execute1AsyncCommand 和 Execute2AsyncCommand 都会承认这一点?这是我的调用者类:
public class Caller : ObservableObject
{
public ObservableTask Execute1Task { get; } = new ObservableTask();
public ObservableTask Execute2Task { get; } = new ObservableTask();
public ICommand Execute1AsyncCommand { get; }
public ICommand Execute2AsyncCommand { get; }
public Caller()
{
Execute1AsyncCommand = new AsyncRelayCommand(Execute1Async);
Execute2AsyncCommand = new AsyncRelayCommand(Execute2Async);
}
private bool CanExecute(object o)
{
return Task1?.Running != true && Task2?.Running != true;
}
private async Task Execute1Async(object o)
{
Task1.Running = true;
try
{
await Task.Run(()=>Thread.Sleep(2000)).ConfigureAwait(true);
Task1.RanToCompletion = true;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Task1.Faulted = true;
}
}
private async Task Execute2Async(object o)
{
Task2.Running = true;
try
{
await Task.Run(() => Thread.Sleep(2000)).ConfigureAwait(true);
Task2.RanToCompletion = true;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Task2.Faulted = true;
}
}
}
在其他呼叫者中,我仍然希望能够使用AsyncRelayCommand(),而只有callback 是强制性的。在这种情况下,CanExecute 应该在内部从 AsyncRelayCommand 进行评估,就像我原来的实现一样。
为了完整起见,这是我的观点:
<StackPanel>
<Button Content="Execute Task 1"
Command="{Binding Execute1AsyncCommand}" />
<Button Content="Execute Task 2"
Command="{Binding Execute2AsyncCommand}" />
<TextBlock Text="Task 1 running:" />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Task1.Running}" />
<TextBlock Text="Task 2 running:" />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Task2.Running}" />
</StackPanel>
和 ObservableTask 类:
public class ObservableTask : ObservableObject
{
private bool running;
private bool ranToCompletion;
private bool faulted;
public Task Task { get; set; }
public bool WaitingForActivation => !Running && !RanToCompletion && !Faulted;
public bool Running
{
get => running;
set
{
running = value;
if (running)
{
RanToCompletion = false;
Faulted = false;
}
}
}
public bool RanToCompletion
{
get => ranToCompletion;
set
{
ranToCompletion = value;
if (ranToCompletion)
{
Running = false;
}
}
}
public bool Faulted
{
get => faulted;
set
{
faulted = value;
if (faulted)
{
Running = false;
}
}
}
}
我想要实现的是在用户按下一个按钮后都被禁用,直到所有任务完成。
解决方案
我最终得到了以下实现,到目前为止它按预期工作:
public class AsyncRelayCommand : ICommand
{
private bool isExecuting;
private readonly Func<object, Task> execute;
private readonly Predicate<object> canExecute;
private readonly Action<Exception, object> onException;
private Dispatcher Dispatcher { get; }
public event EventHandler CanExecuteChanged
{
add => CommandManager.RequerySuggested += value;
remove => CommandManager.RequerySuggested -= value;
}
public AsyncRelayCommand(Func<object, Task> execute, Predicate<object> canExecute = null, Action<Exception, object> onException = null)
{
this.execute = execute;
this.canExecute = canExecute;
this.onException = onException;
Dispatcher = Application.Current.Dispatcher;
}
private void InvalidateRequerySuggested()
{
if (Dispatcher.CheckAccess())
CommandManager.InvalidateRequerySuggested();
else
Dispatcher.Invoke(CommandManager.InvalidateRequerySuggested);
}
public bool CanExecute(object parameter) => !isExecuting && (canExecute == null || canExecute(parameter));
private async Task ExecuteAsync(object parameter)
{
if (CanExecute(parameter))
{
try
{
isExecuting = true;
InvalidateRequerySuggested();
await execute(parameter);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
onException?.Invoke(e, parameter);
}
finally
{
isExecuting = false;
InvalidateRequerySuggested();
}
}
}
public void Execute(object parameter) => _ = ExecuteAsync(parameter);
}
用法:
public class Caller: ObservableObject
{
public ObservableTask Task1 { get; } = new ObservableTask();
public ObservableTask Task2 { get; } = new ObservableTask();
public ObservableTask Task3 { get; } = new ObservableTask();
public ICommand Execute1AsyncCommand { get; }
public ICommand Execute2AsyncCommand { get; }
public ICommand Execute3AsyncCommand { get; }
public Caller()
{
// Command with callers CanExecute method and error handled by callers method.
Execute1AsyncCommand = new AsyncRelayCommand(Execute1Async, CanExecuteAsMethod, Execute1ErrorHandler);
// Command with callers CanExecute parameter and error handled inside task therefore not needed.
Execute2AsyncCommand = new AsyncRelayCommand(Execute2Async, _=>CanExecuteAsParam);
// Some other, independent command.
// Minimum example - CanExecute is evaluated inside command, error handled inside task.
Execute3AsyncCommand = new AsyncRelayCommand(Execute3Async);
}
public bool CanExecuteAsParam => !(Task1.Running || Task2.Running);
private bool CanExecuteAsMethod(object o)
{
return !(Task1.Running || Task2.Running);
}
private async Task Execute1Async(object o)
{
Task1.Running = true;
await Task.Run(() => { Thread.Sleep(2000); }).ConfigureAwait(true);
Task1.RanToCompletion = true;
}
private void Execute1ErrorHandler(Exception e, object o)
{
Task1.Faulted = true;
}
private async Task Execute2Async(object o)
{
try
{
Task2.Running = true;
await Task.Run(() => { Thread.Sleep(2000); }).ConfigureAwait(true);
Task2.RanToCompletion = true;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Task2.Faulted = true;
}
}
private async Task Execute3Async(object o)
{
try
{
Task3.Running = true;
await Task.Run(() => { Thread.Sleep(2000); }).ConfigureAwait(true);
Task3.RanToCompletion = true;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Task3.Faulted = true;
}
}
}
感谢大家的宝贵帮助!
【问题讨论】:
-
AsyncRelayCommand类应该如何知道调用者发生了什么?调用者有责任更新命令的状态。例如,您可以在SomeCondition或OtherCondition更改时设置IsExecuting属性。否则,命令实现必须订阅对此属性的更改。 -
@mm8 这个订阅可以在 AsyncRelayCommand 中实现吗?
-
为什么在运行任务时使用
.ConfigureAwait(false);?这实际上意味着await下面的代码可能会在随机线程池线程上执行,而不是在 UI 线程上执行。我很确定,但对我来说,似乎可能会发生比赛情况 -
好点,谢谢。更改为 .ConfigureAwait(true)
-
我根本不会写
ConfigureAwait,因为它默认捕获同步上下文。所以我个人认为,即使是true,打电话也会更令人困惑。